July 10, 2009

 

Dear Ben:

 

http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/

 

Please consider the following?

• In order for Bernanke and Smith to sign for a ‘bank instrument confirmation’ they would need to have possession of the original instrument, which this confirmation letter is based upon?
• If they had the original instrument(s), the US Treasury Notes of 1933/34, then they have committed fraud (goes without saying, but I said it).
  • This fits the modus operandi of previous such frauds.  Steal/borrow/power of attorney an asset, place the asset in a friendly bank (very important step) get the bank to issue a bank guarantee/confirmation letter/ proof of funds letter, etc.  Use the asset in an illegal trade.
• What I find interesting is that the account name is in Wilfredo Saurin’s name, but the beneficiary is someone named Mr. Matthias Supersberger? 
  • If you read this article here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2009/06/mystery-bonds-enter-cult-now-it-gets.html you will find that Saurin has been known to do this in the past as well.  So what we have here is a classic money laundering case involving the Federal Reserve.
  • Therefore, an individual (Wilfredo Saurin) has an account at the New York Fed, two instruments for a total of $1B USD.  Fed confirms instruments via letter.
  • The Austrian Raiffeisen bank takes letter for the benefit of a Mr. Supersberger for possible trades?

 

Here are some questions that I would like to ask those in the know?

• The Federal Reserve Bank instrument confirmation letter refers to two US Treasury cheques numbers.  Are these separate instruments from those confiscated in Italy?  Or are they instruments layered against the US Treasury notes 1933/34 confiscated in Italy?
• The letter is dated May 11, 2006.  Have the funds made available to Raiffeisen Bank beneficiary Matthias Supersberger been utilized in any manner?  For example, an illegal bank-trading program, sometimes referred to as High Yield Investment Program (HYIP)?  If they have, Leo Wanta would be impressed.
• Benjamin Fulford makes the claim that the managers of the new financial system will utilize these funds for the ending of wars and other humanitarian projects?  These funds may have been generated in an illegal manner using the fiat system.  Since it is the goal of many that the new system is gold backed, why would a fiat currency be used in this manner?  Any comments?

 

I encourage comments from Mr. Whistleblower on these matters?  It would be interesting to see what he has to say about the two ‘Japanese nationals’?

 

Best Regards,

DG

 

• Go Back

Related in this Category