- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search



Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0


For years the media bias and internet bias has shunned those who have pointed to the skies indicating that lingering condensation trails have affected the weather.

Beginning in the 1980s, the mainstream media began questioning the effects of the lingering trails on climate. The story that was first filed by NBC News and reported by then anchors John Chancellor and science editor Roger O’Neil would have fallen into obscurity if it weren’t for sharp individuals that preserved the report on YouTube.

In the 1990s, the term “Chemtrail” was used as a catch-all for both normal condensation trails and trails that contained chemicals and heavy metals.

There is a well-documented biological component to continuously ongoing atmospheric studies in which nations and regions are furtively inoculated via specially designed delivery systems with combinations of viruses, bacteria, fungi, mycoplasma, desiccated blood cells, and exotic biological markers so that test masters can assess human, animal and plant response. The chemtrail experiment is quite literally an iatrogenic artifact that was intentionally being used by the bio warlords under the direction of the CIA.

The multi-organizational megalith perpetrating these biochemical projects against humanity includes the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and its research arm DARPA, plus the Department of Energy (DOE) with its huge network of national labs and universities. Private defense contractors and pharmaceutical companies are heavily involved. Cooperating governments of other nations and probably some United Nations agencies are complicit since the aerosol projects are global in scope.

Chemtrailing is the public’s term for the classified ongoing artificial modification of Earth’s climate systems using reflective nano-materials in aerosol tails to reflect sunlight. The aerosols are dispersed via jet aircraft trails that expand into reflective artificial clouds.

Now in the 21st century as more information has been gathered and the threat of geoengineering of the planet is ongoing and the term chemtrail or chemtrails is not a scientific term and is thus used to discredit the validity of the anti-geoengineering effort. Now it is important to stress that the term is not helpful to the cause of exposing and halting climate engineering it is recommended that we excuse ourselves from using the term and thus should be avoided.

The question that has plagued those who investigate these trails is what are they supposed to be called?

The answer is now been revealed.

We should call them what the government is now calling them, stratospheric aerosol injections or stratospheric sulfate injections.

At the end of 2018, we should make a commitment to ourselves to use the correct term as the government is now making moves to legitimize the experimental aerosol spraying program that has been underway and has been carried out by private industries under contract from the United States Government.

According to Live Science, scientists are considering conducting dramatic interventions in the atmosphere to cool the planet.

New research suggests that a project of atmospheric cooling would not only be doable but also cheap enough that a single, determined country could pull it off.

However, the catch according to the Technocrats is that that trailing the planet with sulfate injections wouldn’t reverse climate change but that warming would significantly, measurably slow down.

Some scientists firmly contend that rising temperatures and the onslaught of drastic weather events — as well as the destruction of the overall ecosystem resulting from both, make advanced geoengineering to manipulate the planet’s atmosphere and reduce the solar impact a paramount priority.

Last month a paper was published in the journal, Environmental Research Letters, by a pair of researchers from Harvard and Yale universities. It’s the deepest and most current study yet of “stratospheric aerosol injection” also known as “solar dimming” or “solar engineering”.

That is the official term that has the blessing of scientists, where boats, balloons, and planes can spray chemicals into the atmosphere to reflect the sun’s heat back into space, mimicking the global cooling effects of large volcanic eruptions.

The paper says that the new spraying program devoted to global cooling alone would cost $3.5 billion to create new technology for spraying and distributing the sulfate trails.

The majority of the funds would go into building planes able to carry big tanks of aerosol spray into the stratosphere, about double the cruising altitude of a Boeing 747.

The paper proposes 4000 flights a year which is another whopping 2.25 billion dollars to maintain the program over the next 15 years.

The paper also makes it very clear as to what the project entails.

Spray planes will dump sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere, and it will reflect light back into space. SO2 is cheap, and there’s lots of it available. Most of the costs of the project would come from lofting the SO2 high enough that it would stick around.

Wake Smith, a co-author of the paper stated this:

If you deploy material at 35,000 feet [10,700 meters], say, where your 737 flies, it rains back down in a few days, because it’s just being acted on by gravity—the new project would eliminate the spreading process that we see with typical SAI’s.

If you lay a trail high enough according to Smith, then it stays aloft for a year or 18 months.

Smith then condemns the chemtrail conspiracy theories by stating that anything sprayed at the heights at which jetliners fly would disappear within half a week and therefore has no effect on the weather.

The fact that scientists even address chemtrails makes this project all the more suspicious.

This is literally what the mad environmental scientists are now proposing — the very same people who have, for years, claimed that “chemtrails” are a conspiracy theory and don’t exist. Now, all of a sudden, they want to chemtrail the entire planet in order to “save” us all from global warming.

The very idea of “chemtrails” has, until now, been mocked by the media and the science establishment, who has for years claimed the very idea of chemtrails is a lunatic conspiracy theory.

This more than just a preponderance of documented evidence about government sanctioned chemtrails – this is an endgame strategy that will backfire and cause a major climate collapse.

The end game project is known as global dimming, and it’s a dangerous geoengineering plot to spray billions of tons of smog into the atmosphere so that pollution levels would block sunlight and halt global warming.

Everything nature does is just the sum of chemistry, biology and physics. It’s completely amoral; doesn’t care about politics or climate summits or whether or not you are a global warming denier. You can’t negotiate with nature and you can’t spin it and you can’t evade its rules.

If they tamper with the climate and accidentally lower the temperatures worldwide we could see a flash freeze similar to what befell the wooly mammoths.

It is not enough that we all have to fit in as a species and be mindful of the eco-system. We all know and can concede that when a species doesn’t learn to fit within with Nature, it gets kicked out.

Before science fiction author Michael Crichton died, he was ostracized for a speech that he gave on the subject of Complexity Theory and Environmental Management. Michael criticized environmental groups for failing to incorporate complexity theory in their doom-mongering projections of the effects of “climate change.” Crichton boldly chastised those who inflated projected cataclysm from global warming and encouraged them to factor in the possibility that a complex system such as the ecosystem can and will be resilient.

Crichton said that the psychological impact of fearing any predicted cataclysmic event can be far worse than the event itself.

What got Crichton into trouble was his assessment of “Global Warming Fear Mongering.” He stated, “Authoritatively telling people they are going to die can in itself be fatal.”

Junk science and doomsayer fear mongering have thrown out the aspects of complexity theory and its effects on the environment. No one even brings up the idea about the resilience of systems and how the earth is capable of adjusting and healing on its own.

This means that with every so-called extinction level event the earth seems to renew itself. It seems that every end of the world theory throws out the hope of resilience.

Resilience gives birth to hope for the world.

The death of the planet will be hastened by doomsayers and mad climate scientists that believe the answer to the planet’s woes are technological tools used for geo-engineering.

What is so aggravating is that for years people have equated chemtrailing with crank conspiracy theory and mental illness. As they pollute the skies and dim the sun, if you point out that they’re polluting the skies and dimming the sun, you’re a “conspiracy theorist.”

Using the term “stratospheric aerosol injection” makes you sound all technocratic and important and would probably garner interest in climate science cultists who will probably give their blessing to this project –even though for years pet projects involving the trailing of the skies for weather control have been going on for 20 years or more.

The global cover-up of chemtrails has been going on in order to give scientists time to legitimize their ongoing crimes against the environment. Now it is official and scientists have molded the program in their image you can now say that the trails in the sky are for the betterment of the weather and the climate.

The reality over time will be far more deadly as trailing the skies will increase and the trails will linger longer than before.

The reduction in solar radiation caused by geoengineering, combined with the natural cycle of global cooling from sun cycles, could produce a sharp reduction in food crop production across the globe. This would result in increased food prices and reduced food supplies, adding to vectors for civil unrest and “climate refugees” invading First World nations to escape starvation.

This of course provides a precedent for implementing scarcity laws and actions that were proposed by Henry Kissinger in 1974.

The U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.”

The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, National Security Study Memorandum outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine.

Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as National Security Adviser (the same post-Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan.

I know we have just laid to rest President George H.W. Bush but his ghost has now been revived because when Bush senior was CIA director he was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.

National Security Study Memorandum 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth and that measure had to be taken to lessen the population of the United States or that we would be forced to regulate vital resources like food and water.

There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that “population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline,” even if such measures were adopted.

A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targeted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: he stated that “There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID U.S. Agency for International Development and consultative groups.

He stated that population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand.

“Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now,” the document continued, adding, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? … Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?”

Kissinger also predicted a return of famines could make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary. In other words, it would be advantageous to create famine in order to curtail birth and thus reduce the population.

Kissinger was clearly advocating starving people in the United States.

The continued trailing of the skies has been effective in creating droughts and harsh winters that begin early and extend into the spring months. This destroys crops and creates food shortages that are unable to meet demands.

Nearly all plants depend on solar radiation for photosynthesis, which uses CO2 as a “fuel” and produces oxygen (O2) as a byproduct. Reducing solar radiation through SAI pollution would reduce the production of oxygen by plants, resulting in a global fall in atmospheric oxygen levels.

Note carefully that the geoengineering efforts being advocated to dim the sun are based on the use of sulfur dioxide trails or smog.

Even the EPA admits that SO2 interferes with human respiration and makes it difficult for people to breathe.

It also creates acid rain or rain that contains sulfurous acid.

This acid rain will devastate forests and food crops and result in the acidification of crop soils, destabilizing soil microbes and leading the widespread crop losses.

All this because they want to increase the poisoning of the atmosphere to fight climate change, and they’ve got about a billion gullible world citizens convinced that this is somehow an amazing idea.

What they would really unleash, of course, is absolutely catastrophic to all life on our world.

The lunacy is not even questionable and their actions seem to indicate that they want a mass cull of the population in order to create a post-human world.

It is a plan where we look up into the skies and unwittingly support our own extinction.

Given the now-planned destruction of Earth’s atmosphere in the name of “climate change,” we must now consider such possibilities, no matter how bizarre they first seem.

Could this be why technocrats like Elon Musk are preparing for a new life on Mars? Is this why physicist Stephen Hawking warned us before he died that we either have to modify our bodies or leave the planet?

Why are the technocrats now so desperate the alter Earth’s atmosphere and make the planet inhospitable to humans?

Think about the interest in frozen civilizations under the ice shelves of Antarctica. Think about the race to gather worldwide DNA and put it all in a database.

Think about the interest in the Arctic seed vault to preserve the seeds of life in preparation for a global cataclysm.

I once appeared on Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory show to address this very issue and he and his researchers uncovered underground bunkers in Virginia and in the Ozarks all readied for the elite survive a global cataclysm.

It really makes you think when mad science is embraced and legitimized by the globalists in order to destabilize economies of various governments that don’t comply with their green economy and political take over.

The question is: are the people of earth being dealt a suicide hand in order to avoid the inevitable?