Custom Search
What We Still Can Do
Dick Eastman
July 22, 2012
The shooting of the theater has drowned out the election issues, the attempted assassination of the Secretary of State in Egypt, move for war with Iran and a Soros-style overthrow of Syria and Iraeli forces entering Lebanon unwelcomed. What is being done in Congress while attention is on this mass killing by a man who I say could never have committed this crime on his own without a lot of help from others sophisticated in the applied behavioral sciences.
The economic crisis has not ceased to exist. Niether has the solution to that problem.
Nations are falling to debt and ruin, except China and except the top of the financial sectors, the international money power, who call themselves the "savers". These "savers" are also the ones who control he money supply by which debts are repayed - that is, they gain place a lot of money through loans to the corporations which they own - which will "trickle down" (be spent) in the domestic loop, raising, for a while, the aggregate demand for consumpiton alone the boost of the original expansionary lending to corporations. That is a Republican Boom. There is also a Democrat Boom which involves the Government handing out non-investment and non-discretionary money through governement to government contractors for social services, each headed by a political operative who is beholden to the party for his job and the people who get the benefit of the social workers and government program :hoop holders - to make people jump through the hoop to get some handouts in the lower loop. There is also the Bi-partisan way to make a Western particularist civilization (limited government, self-supporting (having land and tools for working) self-respecting and self-governing ( making political power as decentralized as possible, and government as much of a bottom up decision process as possible, i.e., a republic.
The problem is trillions are owed. The governments owe it, the household sectors owe it, the private domestic production sector owes it. But the financial sector (the pinpoint sharp apex of the population pyramid with the poorest on the bottom and the richest on the top) this top owns almost all of the wealth. That is what they are doing with their control of lending and money creation and corporationbuilding through bankrupting middle class enterprises. They are taking the wealth of the world. Money can be used for two things only. For creating wealth or for capturing wealth. The Money Power of the financial sector and international corporation sector have the means to make any wealth they want, and they do so for themselves behind our backs -- in the places of preserved "keep-out" sancutary - gigantic estates far in excess of what all the poor people, have for themselves to live on. They own the machines, they own the purchasing power to build new machines for any purpose. They also own the land - and take only those on their land needed to grow the crops they wish to seel in the commodities and futures markets which they control through corruption and outright ownership and monopoly power and weather control capabilites that are kept more or less secret but are never acknowledge by governments or internaitional agencies (all run by the bankers).
Boil this down: The nations are crushed under debt and the creditors are the abriters, the law, the money supply controllers, and they pay the eviction forces (the US evicts governments that do not submit to the finanical rules) with China and India (which is equivalent to Germany in economic power) - and Germany is a captive state, a Molloch of the money power. But I digress from the brief statement ... let me start over.
The nations are crushed under debt while the tiny ruling minorities are owed the trillions. The debt cannot be paid because the tiny moneyed minority chooses not to consume or pay taxes so that government can spend -- except for the military job of foreclosing other nations and clearing the Moslems away from lands that Isreal and China want for themselves without being pestered with the rights of nations. Nations have no rights. According to them God has ordained the the nations will bend to the iron rod of restored Israel. Lost it brief statement again. Start over again.
Trillions are owed to elites and the elites will not role the money back into the domestic economy to prosper it. That is because the IOUs they hold become worth more in deflation and because in deflation middle class businesses change hands, they become, in default, in a deflationary economy, the takings of the creditors to add to his portfolio of real assets.
Trillions of idle cash can be used to foce transfer of existing weath into a new arisctocracy of super wealth, with the governments and enterprises of a self-respecting and sel-sustaining middle class drained away.
The only answer is for this view to become accepted by all the world of the non-super rich at once -- and that there be gigantic repudiation of the trillions owed to these credit-monopoly, land-monopoly, money creation-monopoly, goverment-spending-and-borrowing-politician owning oligarchy, the mostly Zionist and Masonic and Triad crime syndicate.
The trillions in the hands of the Zionist-Mason-Triad families must be taken from them -- the IOUs they hold (the bond debt of nations) must be repudiated, the land must be taken over and redistributed, the money creation power of private central banks must be abolished, the open market operations of central banks should be abolished even by the national govenment. Ample purchasing power must immediately go to those classes of people who have been starved of it. They were starved of it to force them to sell their wealth and their labor to the ruling minority as cheaply as possible in real terms, but now that must stop by the very easy to do expedient fo declaring that all new purchasing power will enter the economy in the hands of the citizens within the household sector for their own consumption services. This new money will be created in the hands of citizens free and clear -- no interest and no requirement that principal be repaid. It is pure discretionary income for the citizen -- to be spent on anything -- and for which no one has to qualify except by being a citizen. In this way businesses will expand from profit. Households will buy education and medicine or new tools for his chosen line of work. Corporations will no longer be able to get new money from the financial sector to make a boom, which then must end when the principal and the interest drain from the economy more than the loans put in. From now on the banks will lend only the savings of households. The corporation will be abolished and replaced by single proporietorships. Politicians will not be owned by corporations any more. Politicians to get elected will have to please a rich and powerful local community that has the money to pay for the campaigns of candidates who will do them good instead of evil as henchment for the old money power.
I see this clearly. I see it not as pie in the sky, but as a plumbing job in an economy the money flows from sector to sector have been badly designed from the standpoint of the nationa and the common good. I mean to change the plumbing. I see what needs to be done, and I see a way that the plumbing can be fixed without a horrendous revolution. The only obstacle is the super rich organized crime people who like having trillions upon trillions of wealth drained to them and the rest of the people reduced to dire poverty and squalor, being pushed to the big urban holding pens where they are invited to kill each other in petty crime, to shorten their lives with drugs and gang life, to dumb down, to feed on the "entertainment:" that degrades them and hides from them the human potential that is the mortal enemy of the new Zionist-Masonic-Triad alliance of sociopathic thugs.
Whatever I write goes to few people. But I know that the social credit idea -- the view of social credit that I have taken you through before -- is possible and can give the world immediate relief from this crisis of organized-crime control of the money system. Social credit is being tried in Ireland and Iceland. It is discussed in Egypt. A website is being discussed with will present this idea to both the english and spanish speaking nations of the earth. Australia, Canada, New Zealand have social credit parties but mostly in name and without a program or a vison for setting up such a system because they are afraid to blame interest drain or to acknowledge the criminal conspiracy of the Zionist-Masonic-Triad power behind all the worlds calamities, even in this time when weather disasters could be prevented with existing technology that is not being shared with nations, but is used as a secret weapon of world oligarchs.
My function is to distill the idea from the many economists and sociologists who have contributed to this system. I am the evangelist of social credit, Pilgrim, and I am showing you the way to the wicket gate past the slough of despond (allusion to Pilgrim's Progrsss, an alagory about taking the straight and narrow path that leads to the celestial kingdom).
Well, Pilgrim, are you ready to leave the City of Destruction and walk the straight path that leads to happiness and well-being?
Today (now) we must go from this:
To this:
First in out thinking, then in our talking, then in our unified grass-roots political insistence backed by the force of convinced public opinion, then to elect true carriers of this solution to control of the brain and arms of government at all levels.
Too much to ask? Better wait and see? Something better may come along? To late? Impossible?
Those are questions you have to answer for yourself.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
reply:
Nah. Gold and getting rid of government is the only answer.
Kucinich and Michal Hudson and Steve Keen say that government should print money and pay off the creditors and that government should so some spending of new money on projects of Congress's choosing. They say that social credit (money only to households) is unworkable. They say that repudiating debt never works. They say the nation has an obligation to pay the debt, but that the goverment can simply inflate the money into the financiers pockets. After all the money all came from their thrifty savings while the rest of us bought big TVs and SUVs etc.
Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell, say all we need is competing currencies - so that the savers can require repayment in gold so they will know it is safe to invest again and get the market economy going so it will grow and people can keep up their tens of trillions of debt payments by all the production we will do - at wages low enough to get labor jobs back from China --
Obama - build alternative energy and high speed rail conncecting china with the east coast to get business going again - ration medicine to save money that would have gone to useless seniors so payments on debt can be maintained and the old and useless will pass away and not burden the bright future (advised by Goldman Sachs)
Romney - reorganise what is left of domestic production so it can compete with China and its labor force, get rid of regulation, cut consumptiona and government spending so that interest payments on debt can be maintained so that investors will feel safe investing here. (Advised by the Neo-Cons)
===============================
Dick, you may claim that all men are responsible for other men. That isn't true. How can one be responsible for someone who is completely out of one's control?
One has to teach the children. If the children are lost, all is lost.
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/12-factors-that-are-turning-the-streets-of-america-into-a-living-hell
I've done all I could to help a few children. I've tried to educate other people. I'm trying to set things up so that i can help people when all hell lets loose. That isn't working out so well. The state has blocked me from fixing my house up. Not much more I can do.
Dan
Dan,
There are many completely good people completely out of control of parents and the usual standards of conduct. But they are under someone's control - the control of someone not controlling in their best interest.
I fight fight for everyone not in control of his life in this Judeo-pornographic world of no good options -- pointing to everbody, to every class and culture -- that the machine that hands out incentives to ruin must be replaced by an economic system that hands out the means for the individiual, the household sector, the consumer, the citizen to be truly sovereign -- not with a vote you use ever four years to pick from a menu of minions you had no say in choosing -- but with the real medium of popular democracy - good money in the hands of citizens so that the economy can be led by what they want, rather than what a bunch of parasites who have gotten control of the the token system and the coercive apparatus want to force us to do through monopoly power and debt slavery.
Change the economic plumbing and our children will stop being sucked down the toilet and our businesses down the drain.
These things must come free from outside the system -- sunlight, water, money.
It's that simple.
(Note: I am not talking about social credit replacing paychecks for anybody. I am talking about social credit replacing corporation investment or governemnt financed wars and deficit financed Congressional pork spending as the source of all new money.
To understand it is to agree, unless of course you are attached to the financial sector and live to maximize bond wealth (maximize debt slave ownership) and seek the land of half a small country for your pretty wife to ride her horse in each morning.
Don't believe the Fox News model of human nature -- Holmes made capable of that crime by a deliverate training program that he thought was mere recreation with
The on-line computer games Holmes played could have been both behavior diagnostic and a teaching/conditioning machine. Each decision Holmes made in a game could have been measured, as his response to a certain situation. The controllers would want to instill/teach the repertoire needed for the crime component by component, with reinforcement for each approximation or behavioral component achieved. But the game would have other features that would desensitize him to the ordinary aversiveness that inflicting harm or hurt on others elicits in the normally aculturated person (of traditional American culture). The came could require him to kill and kill again, until the game desensitized him to killing, but also reinforced it -- with whatever social reinforcers the game could determine were effective for Holmes and could deliver. The game was probably developed for multiple conditioning functions but with modifications to desensitize to and reinforce specific desired responses to be brought under specific generalized stimulus control.
Holmes was taught, possibly cheered on by someone -- perhaps someone he met through the on-line game itself -- contact fellow players etc. -- so this person could affirm Holmes in the responses he was to make, to give attention, affection or approval for what was done. Is this not what is done to desensitize our sons and brothers to killing when they go to war. Not to mention the Rambo drug.
Think of the Colombine killer, a Jew who was conditioned to hate Christians, who then snapped and began killing them. He was programmed to that by his parents, just as the settlers in the Jewish Kabbutz are conditioned to think nothing of killing Palestinians for sport or cutting off a boy's arm for throwing rocks at an Israeli tank taking down a Palestinian oilive grove.
The conditioning need not involve drugs or psycho-surgery -- so called reinforcement psychology, based on Skinner, Pavlov and Tvarsky can get the job done.
Dick Eastmanol
oldickeastman@q.com