7-4-17

CHAPTER 3

REC #1  HATONN

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 3, 1990  7:30 A.M.  YEAR 3, DAY 140

Hatonn present in light.  We shall simply have to take that which needs response first and then move on to the Journal as we find time.  There will soon come a point, however, when we shall have to move our thrust from mass information into the area of responding in “mass manner”.  For these early questions and denouncements I shall leave it up to GG (or whomever forwards me the questionnaires) to do with the response that which they will.  You are going to find that I have less and less patience with the transgressors of truth and shall not, in all instances, be very kind.

 

The same ones who lecture night and day regarding things such as MJ-12 and other “cover-up” operations and bellow loud and long about “How could they?” come right back with innocent eyes and say, “Now, this is truth”--and “We caught them this time”.  Oh, you precious little blind children--Satan is the most clever ruler of all---in your “uncovering” you are getting EXACTLY that which it is desire you have!  Further, you who go forth in newly-found “knowledge” and “indignation” play right into the hands of evil.

 

NO, I DID NOT SAY YOU ARE EVIL, NOR THE ONES FROM WHOM YOU GET YOUR INFORMATIONN---I AM TELLING YOU THE SOURCES OF INFORMATION ARE EVIL!  YOU ARE THE DUPES.

 

There is a struggle going on for the very capturing of soul energy and it is on a level of being that is so far beyond your conscious imagination as to be incredible unto you.  You ones touch on truth and in the next breath and statement show that you know not that of which you speak.  You back up my truth at the same breath that you denounce me.  Again, I shall have to take the correspondence sentence by sentence and give it back unto the source so that you can look at it.  I do this for G&D-G, because the writer has already pronounced his position.

 

Just as “A sprinkling of conspiracy facts and then a generalization about a cosmic code and abandonment plan for the planet is suspicious communications, so also is the partial and misleading use of my previous correspondence.”  I had no desire to use “your” correspondence in any manner other than to respond to the receivers thereof.  Neither can you take these journals totally out of context and form opinions.  That is what is wrong with the entire circumstance---human takes bits and pieces, assembles them in emotional response and pronounces conclusions--which in almost ALL instances are incorrect.  Then, having made foolish conclusions publicly cannot set aside ego to hear truth--and dear one that is exactly where you sit--in the misinformation hot-seat, wherein you become a wondrous tool for misinformation and distraction.  Further, somehow getting some opinion into print, the ego goes off wham-bam and suddenly the lie appears as truth and you become an “expert authority” when it is but your ignorance you pronounce.  As a matter of fact I go most easy on you in this particular instance because of other ones involved and THEY deserve gentle response to their desire for truth is great indeed.

 

As we move through this series of thought patterns, I ask that all who have participation in this communion really see and hear both sides most carefully indeed.  For as an interrogator, I can be most simple and blunt--you wish to play games and this is far too serious a matter to simply play little stage games.

 

I will quote as I go along:

 

(TD)  “Dear G:  Some further thoughts for our correspondence.”

 

No, there is no further “thinking” involved--there is simply another barrage of misinformation to dissuade these beautiful persons from their work.  You, T.D., spout more insipid “junk” pronounced by others to make whatever point you perceive you are making--the point other than to discredit “The Pleiadian friends” is the only point I could find in the document.

 

(TD):  “If anyone thinks abductions of whole families and especially women of all ages who are sexually mature, by the Reticulians and their Masters, has been primarilya scare tactic, they should talk to the psychologists, psychiatrists and physicians who have regressed and examined these unfortunates.”

 

Please look at your own words.  “primarily” is a good one to begin with.  What do you mean---“should talk to the psychologists, psychiatrists and physicians who have regressed and examined these unfortunates”?  It seems you prove my point--it certainly works, does it not?  And who are these examiners and regressors?  If they are hypnotists out of the AMA approved schools of hypnosis--I primarily discount their ability to discern mental status, in most instances.  Go on, you further make my case at every juncture, although I have no bone to pick with them for that is not the thrust of this particular conversation.

 

Most of your information is coming from writers such as gynecologist, Richard Neal, and “Dr.” Harry Seagal and I have no wish to credit or discredit their work.  My urge is for you ones to use your God-given brains.

 

TD:  “It is what John Lear, ex-CIA pilot and agent, meant when he said,”…the Deal, the U.S. selling out on its own people’.  Over 100,000 people with biological implants have been tracked down regularly for primarily a mass cross-fertilization program since 1950.”  Firstly, anyone who is ex-CIA and walking around denouncing CIA agents is first suspect.  The CIA is very good at what it does, friends--and ex-CIA agents are most carefully monitored in speech contents and ones pronouncing the “wrong” things are immediately (or more subtly) “taken out”.  I take no exception to one John Lear--he is just not telling anything that hurts the “cause”--he is spreading the disinformation concept the CIA, FBI and CFR and Trilaterals want you to have.  THEY DO NOT MIND “LOOKING BAD”, DEAR ONES!

 

In the decades following the early 50’s, hundreds of experiments are reported and documented as to games your people play---in the winter of 53/54, several thousand animals were brought from Porton Down and tethered to rafts at sea some miles off the Bahamas, which was then a British colony.  The microbiologists watched through binoculars as from upwind clouds of bacteria were released to drift over the animals.  The diseases tested were anthrax, brucellosis and tularemia.  The corpses of the infected animals were burned at sea.

 

Let’s get closer now:  While these tests showed the relative virulence of the diseases under examination, they did not solve the central problem of how easy it would be to attack a large city or military base.  Experiments with “harmful-harmless” bacteria soon after the war, had shown how easy it was for germs to penetrate the interior of a sealed ship, but now attacks were needed against civilian targets.  Over the next two decades, there would be over 200 experiments in the United States alone in which military and civilian targets, including whole cities and under directions and full co-operation of the intelligence services, would be attacked with ‘imitation’ biological weapons.  The tests were conducted in total secrecy.  If inquisitive officials asked questions, they were told the army was conducting experiments with smokescreens to protect the city from radar detection.  The target of the attacks ranged from isolated rural communities to entire cities, including New York and San Francisco, to name two.

 

One of the earliest experiments took place in San Francisco in 1950.  The Pentagon believed it might be possible for a Soviet submarine to slip into an American harbor (that is valid indeed), release a cloud of bacteria, and disappear before the victims of the attack had even begun reporting to hospitals.  San Francisco, the headquarters of the Sixth Army and much of the Pacific fleet, seemed a likely target for such an attack.   Between the 20th and 26^th September 1950, the theory was tested by two U.S. Navy minesweepers steaming up and down outside the Golden Gate Bridge.  On board the naval vessels crewmen released clouds of spray contaminated with Bacillus globigiiANDSerratia marcescens, two supposedlyharmless bacteria.  The Serratia marcescensstrain code-named ‘8 UK’ had been developed at Port Down during the Second World War because when incubated it turned red, making it very easily identifiable when used in biological warfare experiments.

 

There followed six mock attacks on the city.  In their report later, the scientists concluded that 117 square miles of the San Francisco area had been contaminated, and that almost every one in the city had inhaled the bacteria.  In other words, they wrote, “nearly every one of the 800,000 people in San Francisco exposed to the cloud at normal breathing rate…inhaled 5000 or more particles.  Any other area having a steady wind and a degree of atmospheric stability comparable to San Francisco is vulnerable to a similar type of attack, and there are many such areas in the U.S. and elsewhere.”

 

The San Francisco test was only one of many.  In 1951, American Navy personnel deliberately contaminated ten wooden boxes with Seratia marcescens, Bacillus globigii and Aspergillus fumigatis before they were shipped from a supply depot in Pennsylvania to the navy base in Norfolk, Virginia.  The tests were destined to establish how easily disease might be spread among the people employed to handle the boxes at the supply depot.  Of the three infectious bacteria, Aspergillus fumigatis had been specifically chosen because black workers at the base would be particularly susceptible to it.

 

Now what of the “harmless” aspect?  The entire San Francisco area had a massive “flu outbreak” finally labeled some type of swine virus and several deaths occurred.  Everyone who got a good dose of the “stuff” got terribly ill.

 

Tell me, dear ones, do you truly believe that research has stopped or that techniques have not gotten even more vile?  You, a population of cities with a military defense totally unprotected with even fallout shelters, think you are not vulnerable to sneaky, secret attacks of “fear” mongering?  YOU HAVE HAD FORTY YEARS TO IMPROVE YOUR SYSTEMS SINCE SERRATIA MARCESCENS INTO SAN FRANCISCO!  COME NOW, TD, YOU ARE EITHER NAÏVE BEYOND MY ABILITY TO BELIEVE OR YOU ARE DEADLY TO YOUR BROTHERS.

 

(TD):  “This conspiracy has been verified by a number of government agents.”  WHO?  FIRST HAND?  GRAPEVINE?  HORSES MOUTH?  WHAT DO YOU MEAN CROSS-FERTILIZATION?  IF YOU TAKE TWO TOTALLY ALIEN SPECIES AND CROSS THEM--YOU GET NAUGHT FOR YOUR WORK.  “IF” THE REPTILIANS ARE PLAYING IN THIS GAME AND MOST OF THE RETICULIANS ARE ROBOTS--WHAT HAVE YOU TO CROSS-FERTILIZE?  YOU HAD BETTER STOP DISCOUNTING PLEIADEANS AND START LOOKING FOR YOUR SATAN IN THE WOODPILE.

 

Funny thing is if you cross a good male jackass with a lovely mare horse---you get a mule--sterile and unable to reproduce.  These, brothers are almost the same species.  Further you totally discount any arrangements which might have been made with the “evil” of earth.

 

(TD):  “Not only are the Reticulians ‘PROBABLY’ genetic engineering creations now degenerating, but the chemical/gene baths, and the ongoing genetic play at these two bases at Groom Lake and Dulce, have been described in detail by MPs risking their lives.”

 

The word “probably” is highly suspect and indicates “someone’s” opinion vs. fact.  Yes, I am sure that MPs are risking their lives to tell of these things and I do most surely and sincerely appreciate their position, however, unless ones have “facts” it is still supposition and often gets distorted in the retelling.

 

(TD):  “The abnormal pregnancies and premature end of pregnancies in two months after subsequent abductions, the most painful mechanical abortions to save the half-human half-Reticulian fetuses, the neural implants, and the surgical scars on parents and children have all been verified by physicians!!”

 

I know of no extraterrestrial so uninformed or technically backward who would behave in such manner as to “get caught later” unless fully intended that it be so!

 

(TD):  “Your Pleiadian friends should be more forthright and honest with you about these things, which are very obvious now.”

 

The apparently “obvious” is the most deadly of all, my friend.  GG’s Pleiadean friends are being totally forthright and honest---it is just not what YOU and the misinformed wish to hear!  Now, however, you move on to worthwhile and very valid information which you should study most carefully.

 

(TD):  “As has been forecasted for this battle with evil at this time, there will be so much negativity and misrepresentation, that it will be most difficult to discern who are up righteous and who are manipulative.  And that comes at all levels as we climb the stairway of truth and higher consciousness (wolves in sheep’s clothing).”

 

SO BE IT!  I BELIEVE YOU STATE IT QUITE NICELY!

 

(TD):  “A sprinkling of conspiracy facts and then a generalization about a cosmic code and abandonment plan for the planet is suspicious communications.  So also is the partial and misleading use of my previous correspondence.”

 

I have already responded to this material but I have a question or two remaining---.  Why do you send correspondence and messages to me (and you did so), unless you want a response?  Further, did you expect me to sit and feed you back the lies simply because you assume “THIS RECEIVER” TO BE UNINFORMED AND PLAYING THE SAME OLD GAME OF “DUPE THE PUBLIC”?  THIS RECEIVER KNOWS NOTHING OF THESE THINGS---SO YOU HAVE COME TO THE HORSE’S MOUTH, FRIEND, AND FURTHER--THERE IS NOTHING BUT A LONG MORNING’S WORK FOR THESE ONES---NOT STAGE ENTERTAINMENT SEMINARS OR HEFTY FEES FOR PHONY AND MISLEADING “EXPERTISE” AND NO PERSONAL INTERPRETATIONS OF INFORMATION OR DATA---DOES THAT POSSIBLY CONCERN YOU?”

 

ANONYMITY serves two purposes---one to pass out information for which you will not have to stand responsible.  The other is for the protection of the very life-flow of a writer.  Which is your status, TD?  There is an old “saying” on your placement---“If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen”.  A rehash of other’s opinion and interpretations is worthless.  This is precisely why I give none of my scribe’s opinions and always can back up statements with facts.  You give forth altered information from entertainers who glean at your expense and then wish me to feed it back to you with a pat on the back.  Well, not so; a kick in the backside is more in order!

 

Chela, let us take a break---all of you ones are ill with “accidental flu poisoning”.  I am sorry dear ones; you are caught in the evil of the times.  I will get back to this as soon as you have had respite; these are most valuable discussions indeed.  Excellent opportunity to get our material forth, however, for controversy of evil with truth is excellent for Aton does not often become faint at heart!  So be it!  I will stand by.  SALU, HATONN

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J012.pdf