Dec. 7, 2012

‘CRUCIFIXTION OF THE PHOENIX’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #12 - CHAPTER  9

 

REC  #1    SANANDA

THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 1990   8:00 A.M.   YEAR 3, DAY 148

 

Sananda to commune.  I see we have some painful subject matter to­day.  Firstly, allow me to remind you ones of something, for great quarrels are be­ing conjured because of ridicu­lous pro­nouncements.

 

The word is coming back that this writer declares Jesus to be ei­ther extinct or a mental figment or worse, an imposter and now some new “Sananda” is the big cheese.  Oh dear, you ones of that tiny, dark planet with all its beauty—do not either listen or see.

 

You are into the time of the “prophecy’s fruition”—not only would I not re­turn as the iden­tical “Jesus” than I would return as the identical Quetzal Coatl or Buddha.  STOP your foolishness—even in your tampered “Bibles” it was said that the Christ would bear a new name to designate his position.  That name is simply “Sananda”.  It is a designation and you do not understand the Universal language.  I have been coming and going for some many years in this latter century—as Sananda—mostly to the higher places of teaching and to the places where the remaining portions of the continents con­tain remnants of your ancient civilizations.  IT WOULD BE MOST WISE INDEED, IF THE QUARRELS CEASE AND MAN LOOKS AROUND AT THE PLIGHT IN WHICH HE IS MIRED.  IT IS OF SATAN TO CAUSE DERI­SION AND DENIAL FOR THERE IS NAUGHT SAVE LIGHT AND TRUTH IN THESE WORDS.  CONTINUE TO DENY AND THE GRIM REAPER SHALL EXPUNGE THE LIE AND IT SHALL BE UGLY IN­DEED.  SO BE IT. 

 

How did you expect me to make an entrance and how were you to be pre­pared?  Did you think I would come via Jimmy Bakker or Jimmy Swaggart?  How about Ramtha?  Mafu?  Lazarus?  No, I would come again, first within the hearts of man.  Further, there would be a great revival of man turning into truth as the Word goes forth—I AM THE WORD!  Not this little scribe who would resign her post—”I” AM THE WORD.  Do not be dismayed by those who do not believe—there is no force from God—each will make his choice.  You dear ones who make effort at sending forth the word, do not waste of thy time in the re­morse of those who will not hear.  As it spreads and grows—they will hear, or, they simply will continue to discredit.  If you listen—really listen—to their tales, you can know of it’s ig­norance and untruth and they have sim­ply become ensnared within the tentacles of the liar.

 

It comes from the egos which assume themselves to be “too big” to be at­tacked and either do not know how to remove the evil fragments or find it “beneath” their need to do so.  They are easiest to en­trap.  These ones “know it all” already and have great “visions” and it usually has more to do with hu­man “following”—”fan clubs” and/or riches gaining.  Some are simply duped.

 

If an “energy” tells you everything you “want” to hear, be highly suspect of that mouth!  Al­most everything coming forth in truth is that which NO ONE WANTS TO HEAR!  HOWEVER, WITH IT COMES THE SOLU­TIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS—AND ALWAYS THE GRACE OF CREATOR AND THE UNLIMITED FORGIVENESS, LOVE AND PLACEMENT.

 

FURTHER, KNOW—AND THIS IS SPECIFICALLY FOR GG WHO IS DISHEART­ENED AT THE RESPONSES OF ONE LARGE GROUP OF “FOLLOWERS” OF AN ANCIENT SPACE BEING.  FIRSTLY, THE IN­FORMATION, EXCEPT FOR ANY NEGATIVE REMARKS FOUND THEREIN, WILL NEVER MAKE IT TO THE SPEAKER OR WRITER.  SECONDLY, YOU MUST CONSIDER THE SORTING PRO­CESS AND GO WITHIN, AND RECOGNIZE THAT EVIL SETS UP THE ROAD­BLOCKS LONG IN ADVANCE OF THE LIGHT.  I SHALL NOT, AT THIS TIME, COMMENT ON WHICH IT IS FOR IT SHALL SORT OF ITSELF.

 

It is the “little man” who will pick up the banner and move.  It will be the in­sightful who are al­ready breaking away from the dog­mas and idiot doctrines of orthodox denominations—try ones such as James Robison who has pulled away from the Baptist denomination and TURNED TO THE CHRIST AND GOD.  But you have to MAKE him hear for he is bombarded with and buried with condemnation and piles of litera­ture.  BUT MAN IS STARVING FOR TRUTH—FOR EVERYONE, NOT JUST THE SELECT FEW WHO CAN AFFORD EX­PENSIVE SEMINARS AND MUSH FOR THE BELLY.

 

LET US SPEAK ON THE CORRESPONDENCE FROM DG.

 

SEX, MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, COHABITATION, ETC.

 

Dharma, we shall simply have to divert intent of work unto that which is most urgent, for if we give not answers to the questions we have done naught but stir the pot.

 

(DG): “. . . I will concentrate my questions now on The Laws of Creation as stated in And They Called His Name Im­manuel.  Please forgive me but I am confused about sexual activities, cohabitation and divorce.  I am sure that oth­ers will want to understand as I do and I would like to be able to ex­plain it logi­cally to them after I understand.”

 

Let me first remind you that two things must be held in conscious­ness at this reading and ex­planation.  l: This document was “translated” from scrolls writ­ten at the time of the one Im­manuel (Jesus) of Nazareth over two thousand years past, and, 2: This is long “after the fact” and explanation is always given by God as to the errors which produced the plight.  Lessons are “experience” and humanity is set up to learn from these third dimensional experi­ences in great­est abundance of any placement.  I FURTHER REMIND YOU THAT IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS QUITE ACCEPTABLE UNTO GOD—BUT NEITHER DOES HE ALLOW HIS LITTLE ONES TO BE RE­MAINING BLIND IN THE EVIL.

 

Ones are saying, “Well, now someone has come along and given us some new command­ments and all this is nonsense.”  No—they are sim­ply stated in the writing as they are, no more and no less.  Whether or not you or I agree with the content makes no difference whatsoever.  There is a great reason for the Laws and it is not that which you accept it to be.  It is not a bunch of ridiculous restrictions to make your life unhappy——YOU HAVE DESTROYED YOUR LIFE OF HAPPINESS THROUGH THE MISUSE OF THE GREAT AND WONDROUS GIFTS GIVEN UNTO YOU.

 

Dharma, I shall attempt to answer these questions in the order extended.  This will be lengthy so please do not become annoyed for we shall simply not intend to write on the Journal today—or we may consider this a portion of the Journal.

 

We shall just dive off into the first question and hope we keep our audience long enough to read the dissertation at the end of the writing for if you do not, you will continue to not under­stand.

 

“If one is married and loves his/her mate, is it against the laws of Cre­ation to engage in sexual intimacy if the intent is NOT procreation, only mu­tual sharing of love through sexual intimacy?  If yes, please explain the logic behind this.”

 

This question needs to be carefully read for I shall answer to the exactness of the question without consideration of the questions which follow:  NO, if in fact—it is totally mutual and there is no ill manipulative intent involved.  Fur­ther, it is YES if there is not full honor and care­ful consideration given to the possibility of the borning of a child.  The facts are that hu-man has lost his ability to discern “love” from the “act of sex”.  In 999 cases out of 1000 “love”, as such, never enters into the equation.  When man and woman desire the oneness of each other they should try first to become one in energy intent.  You have almost no in­timacy in your rela­tionships as you now practice them.  “Sex” is not intimacy.  What the Law indicates is need for total RESPONSI­BILITY of your ac­tions and not carelessly hop­ping into the “hay” to romp around without thought to the impact either on the partner or the possible outcome of the re­lationship.  Your heart will know of the differ­ence.  Some­times one partner or the other might—in love—wish to “accommodate” the other but this is rare indeed, for the level of “mutual” re­sponse is far differing both in the sexes and the emo­tions.  It is most rare indeed that one “gives” to the other in to­tal love—it is usually more that “I may get something later if I cooper­ate now.”

 

The point, of course, is that the sexual union does have a purpose and man has forgotten that “love” is far more than ten or fifteen minutes of pleasure.  Love has really nothing to do with it for it is simply a body function—further it is the one body function that has pulled down your entire civilization over and over again. 

 

It is also that God desires you raise yourself above the level of non-thinking animal and as­sume thoughtful responsibility for your actions.  In the ultimate union there is shared intent of pur­pose and the total consideration of one for the other and it all takes care quite nicely, of itself. 

 

Is there “forgiveness” for “sex in all the wrong places”?  Of course—you have been trained and bribed and pushed into the ac­tions of a current society ruled by evil.  Do you not see?  The damage is done and you cannot in any way change that which has gone before.  It is over and done.  Man did not listen nor obey the Laws and you now end up with a mess.  Forgiveness is not in question—understanding of truth is the point.  Responsibility!

 

“If the above is yes, what if one or both partners are steril­ized?  Or is it against the laws of Creation because it involves self-pleasure?  And if so what is the logic of this law if you are married and sex is ONE way of many you express your love for each other?”

 

The magic word is in the first sentence—”sterilized”.  You have “come a long way Baby”.  Mankind showed his disdain and selfishness when he first found sterilization.  This abdi­cated all responsibil­ity for his fun and games.  Again, you who practiced such simply prove unto your­selves that you are people of the lie.  It seemed a most propitious thing to do to prevent the further procre­ation of children and so it “sometimes” does.  What it truly means is that, “I can now seek all that pleasure without consideration of any con­sequences for my fun and games.”  If you have been sterilized, are you lesser in some man­ner?  No, in fact in the mess of civiliza­tion you probably are among the few thoughtful and responsible “lovers”.  Forgiveness?  Again, there is naught to forgive if you did these things in true be­lief—”ignorance” of the Law is totally accept­able.  However, pronouncement of, “I didn’t know what I was doing,” when you actually did not know is one thing—to have known ex­actly what you were doing and you did it anyway, might need a little ex­tra forgiveness within, and you might just “mention” it to God.  Either way, forgive yourself for it is past and naught can change of it.

Accept it and put it from your mind, chelas, and move on—today is the day to be considered, not your goodness nor your bad­ness of yesterday.

 

I will give you a wonderful hint, however, as you pursue the path of light, the need for the mis­behavior and self-indulgence shall lessen and lessen and the matter shall take care of it­self.  A man is that which he thinks about—when you stop thinking first on these things and turn to ac­tivities of greatness—you shall find no problem in the matter.

 

These thoughts which are unfulfilling in any manner whatsoever are thrust upon you from babyhood on, in the media, etc.  It is pur­poseful in order to pull you down and claim your at­tention from your purpose.  You are an en­slaved people—to sex which is unful­filled, to violence which stimulates sexual drives, and to illicit relationships which give the old adrenaline a bit of a rush.  All the while your planet goes down the tubes while you are playing around in one bed or another and having unwanted children or mur­dering them—all these actions harden the heart and make man sav­ages for he loses compas­sion——ALL FOR SELF.

 

The next time you think that “ONE” way to show love unto your mate—con­sider alterna­tives and try it.  You may find something very interesting surfaces.  No, I do not denounce that in­teraction but in truth of the Laws as given down, I have no right to comment on my opinion at all.  THE CREATION MUST, IN PERFECTION, MAINTAIN BAL­ANCE AND MAN IS ALLOWED HIS EXPERIENCES ON THIS PHYSICAL ORB TO GROW INTO SPIRI­TUAL PERFECTION—WHAT YOU DO ALONG THE JOUR­NEY IS WHAT EITHER GETS YOU THERE IN PERFECTION OR CAUSES YOU TO RE-TRY UNTIL YOU DO GET IT STRAIGHT—NO MORE AND CERTAINLY, NO LESS.

 

“Why the differences between Cohabitation and mar­riage if the people are just as committed to each other in love?”

 

This is most excellent indeed.  None.  However, once again ones must look carefully at the cause and effect.  Why are you cohabi­tating?  Why would you marry?  The first question al­ways is, “Why are you not married if you have the same commitment?”  Well, mar­riage is so carelessly entered into in this soci­ety, as is cohabita­tion.  It is broken as easily as it is made, in contract format.  It is the lack of responsibility of entering into either arrange­ment which is the negative component.  Do you cohabit to simply have a regular sexual partner?  Wrong!  Do you cohabit to make it easier to break up if you should decide you do not care for each other?   Wrong!  Because of the first answer.  A true marriage en­tered into in love, life intent (even if it fails) and careful, re­sponsible thought is not a contractual piece of paper.  However, again be­cause of misuse of the procreation components—prob­lems usually arise with the birthing of children and the financial prob­lems, etc., etc., and has nothing to do with “contract” or respon­sibility. 

 

The statistics yesterday (on TV) showed that there are $30 billion outstanding payments from “child support”.  In all cases it is giv­ing in to the lust of the moment without the will­ingness to bear the responsibility for the actions.

 

Further, birth control in all instances, is a lack of responsibil­ity of bearing re­sponsibility for ac­tions—that of self-discipline and self-control in the first place.  Wrong?  Right?  I guess you can be the judge—your planet is slipping into reversed axis be­cause you are suffering the conse­quences of 5 & 1/2 bil­lion over­population.  Can the few seconds of time spent in an open wash be­hind a bush in South Africa be worth even “one” of those dying, suffering and innocent chil­dren?  Look into their faces and then answer me.  Responsibility vs. a few brief seconds of pleasure.  To some obviously the response is “yes”.  Well, these are the conse­quences.

No one shouts to train these dear beings to stop the non-responsi­ble behav­ior—it is “teach them birth control”!  Abstinence IS the only positive means of birth control.  No one says “teach and de­mand abstinence of such behavior in the children”, it is “give them sex classes and show them mechanical birth con­trol”.  IT IS THE “BEHAVIOR” THAT IS WRONG—NOT “LOVE” FOR YOUR FELLOW MAN OR WOMAN OR CHILD.  IS IT LOVE THAT WOULD HAVE A FATHER RAPE HIS DAUGHTER OR SON?  OF COURSE NOT—IT IS TOTAL EVIL AND YET, IT IS BEHAVIOR, NOT THE THOUGHT.  IF A MAN THINKS SUCH A THING HE SHOULD GET ON HIS KNEES AND CLEAR THE THOUGHT—IT IS THE AC­TION THAT DESTROYS.  IF ALL EMPHASIS WERE NOT ON THESE ACTIVITIES IN EVERY FORM OF YOUR ME­DIA—THE THOUGHT WOULD NOT BE THERE IN ANY CASE.

 

MAN HAS COME TO ACTUALLY BELIEVE THESE THINGS ARE HIS “RIGHT”.  WELL, HE KNOWS THEY ARE NOT—SO HE BECOMES VILE AND EVIL IN OR­DER TO LIVE WITH HIS ACTIONS.

 

Cohabitation and marriage—with the same measure of responsibility and equal contribu­tion which does share and not “put upon” the mate, is the same by definition.  The word Cohabita­tion, however, connotes sexual relationships without the benefit of contract when the act of marriage should be a desire for oneness and companion­ship and not “sex” as its foremost in­tent.  Most mar­riages, how­ever, are built on naught more than “sex” and almost instantly fail for none can live up to the lie perpetrated upon you—even the very pleasure you sought will fail you.

 

It is not the “living” in the same dwelling which gets thee into trouble—it is what thee prac­tices in the same bed which is the culprit.  Friends can live to­gether in great numbers and have great intimacy without so much as a touch.  And yet, look in your the­saurus and you will find the ac­cepted definition of in­timacy is copulation, intercourse, etc.  You see, even the word has been cor­rupted.  Intimacy means to share that which is most precious and se­cret unto your soul——that, friends, is not “a roll in the hay”.

 

We have discussed many, many times—homosexual “love” and homosex­ual “behavior”.  The act of sodomy is purely a lustful and painful act—purely lust­ful.  “Love” of one gender for another requires no “sexual” contact—although it can be most intimate indeed for there is naught to be treasured as one trea­sures a true friend.  “Love” is surely not the possibility of giving that one you claim to love and cherish a deadly disease such as AIDS.

 

I did not create the disease—MAN DID!  I did not proclaim that it should be spread most readily between men practicing sodomy and the mixing of blood from contaminated drug nee­dles.  Man did!  These are the two prevailing ways of transmission.  It becomes almost negligi­ble after a while however, for once in the general public it spreads by any route.  MAN KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE PURPOSELY CRE­ATED THE PROB­LEM—DO NOT BLAME GOD!

 

“Please explain the Divorce law and what is to be­come of someone like me who has married a divorced per­son?  And what is to become of the man I married who was divorced?”

 

Not to appear trite—live happily ever-after.  You married, you divorced, you re-married ac­cording to your hearts and the laws of the land.  You can do nothing to change of it.  You cer­tainly would not move back in time into a damaging situation to effort a recti­fication of some­thing that was wrong in the first place.  It simply is done.  Do that which you can, to the best of your ability to have a “responsible” and “intimate” relationship with that spouse presently yours.

It is a fact, that many marriages which are consummated and the “pair” comes into this truth—are still grossly wrong for each other and shall never have peace in the relationship.  There will yet be many marriages dissolved by the laws of the land for they truly were not consummated in the love of God and The Creation in the first place.

 

Now I shall have to move further back in time to the point in which these rules were first made “public”.  In the days before, and at the time of Jesus, if a woman were to be di­vorced, it was that the woman would be totally destitute and had no manner of tending her­self, nor that of the children for the man would usually simply walk away from all re­sponsibility.  In almost all instances the reasons for the leaving were for lack of the woman’s producing an heir or for in­dulgence of sexual pleasures with another woman.  Again, total lack of responsibility for ac­tions.

 

It is not the divorce which is necessarily incorrect—it was the lack of prepara­tion and responsi­bility in the original marriage.  Mates were chosen incor­rectly, marriages made in­correctly and noth­ing has changed through the cen­turies except the responsibility has be­come less and the methods different.  Woman can better tend her­self today—but not if she has children and men were not made to be mothers and mothers were not made to be fa­thers.  MANKIND has for­gotten that there ever was a purpose in two genders.

 

Again, this is not to condemn you who have changed partners—most have done so quite hon­orably.  It is however, another instance whereby man “votes” in the laws and changes the rules when the truth is you cannot “vote in” THE LAWS OF CREATION.  You can make of the ac­tion legal in the eyes of the lands—it does not make of it right in the truth.  It most certainly is not my de­sire to see any persons live in the hell of a bad relationship.  I would sug­gest, how­ever, that if you handled the “sexual” aspect and the “financial” respon­sibility properly—the di­vorce rate would be negligible.

 

This, again, is to point unto you what has gone wrong in order to bring you to the confu­sion, overpopulation and devastation of an ecological system of a planet which requires re-nurtur­ing.  You see, whether ones wish to consider this a prison planet or not, it is—it is, for you can­not get off this placement—you as humans cannot live in space nor travel to other inhabitable planets—the other planets which you might reach are all prior to your experi­ence and are in the re-cleansing themselves.

 

Whether the Laws are pleasant or not, there was a great reason for the LAWS OF CRE­ATION AS SET FORTH BY CREATOR—your planet was made able to sustain approxi­mately 500 million people with a few more or less—you will now count somewhat over 6 BIL­LION.  I care not what you think of restraint and procreation rules—the facts are—that is what has done you in.  Man ceased using the act as “love” and “creation” and uses it for lust, control and power—all without responsible attitudes toward the partner or to the problems cre­ated.

 

God is now telling you what went wrong so that as the word comes forth, you come into under­standing for there will again come the time when there will be rebuilding and unless you are ready, will­ing and able to abide by the Laws as given forth—you shall end up in this same das­tardly disaster.

 

Dharma, this is going too be much to lengthy to conclude without a break and here it ap­pears, is a good place to pause. 

 

I am very indebted to my precious little D., who has carefully thought and prayed over these questions—they are not lightly asked in behalf of all of you and I accept them in the same deep and sin­cere hope of responding in like manner.  UPPERMOST—REMEMBER THAT WHAT IS PAST IS PAST—MUCH BROUGHT UNTO YOU NOW IS QUITE FRANKLY, AFTER THE FACT—NO ONE LISTENED CAREFULLY AT ONSET.  HOW­EVER, ALL OF YOU WERE PERPETRATORS FOR THIS IS ONLY ONE OF THOUSANDS OF TIMES AROUND AND NOW, FATHER SHOWS US WHERE OUR ANSWERS AND ACTIONS WERE NOT CORRECT AND THAT WHICH MUST COME BACK INTO BALANCE TO MOVE INTO A NEW AND WONDROUS RADIANCE AND ALLOW THIS MARVELOUS CREATION TO HEAL AND RE­BIRTH.  SO BE IT. 

 

LET US LEAVE THIS FOR THE MOMENT AND WE SHALL TAKE UP THE RE­MAINDER OF THE QUERIES A BIT LATER.  ADONAI.

 

                                 SANANDA, ASIDE, TO AWAIT

                                          YOUR SUMMONS.

 

http://www.fourwinds10.net/journals/pdf/J012.pdf­