generated by an Adobe application 12.00

‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST VOL II’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #40 CHAPTER  12

REC  #2    HATONN

THU., NOV. 14, 1991   11:06 A.M.   YEAR 5, DAY 090

THURSDAY,  NOVEMBER 14,  1991

THE  WARSAW  GHETTO

 

In terms of numbers, Polish Jewry is supposed to have suf­fered most of all from extermina­tion, not only at Auschwitz, but at an endless list of newly-discovered “death camps” such as Tre­blinka, Sobibor, Belzec, Chelmno, Maidanek and at many more obscure places which seem suddenly to have gained prominence.  At the center of the alleged extermination of the Polish Jews is the dramatic uprising in April 1943 of the Warsaw Ghetto.  This is often repre­sented as a revolt against being deported to gas ovens; presumably the alleged subject of Hitler and Himmler’s “secret discussions” had leaked out and gained wide publicity in Warsaw.  The case of the War­saw Ghetto is an instructive in­sight into the cre­ation of the extermination leg­end itself.  In­deed, its evac­uation by the Germans in 1943 is often referred to as the “extermination of the Polish Jews” although it was noth­ing of the kind, and layers of mythol­ogy have tended to sur­round it af­ter the publication of sensational novels like John Hersey’s The Wall and Leon Uris’ Exodus.

 

When the Germans first occupied Poland, they confined the Jews, not in detention camps but in ghettos for reasons of secu­rity.  The interior administration of the ghettos was in the hands of Jewish Councils elected by themselves—remember the Jews had openly stated that they were hostile and would join the armed forces against the Germans.  These ghettos were policed by in­dependent Jewish police forces.  Special currency notes were introduced into the ghettos to pre­vent speculation.  Whether this system was right or wrong, it was somewhat un­derstandable in time of war, and although the ghetto is perhaps an unpleasant social establishment, it is by no means barbaric unless ones within the group choose to be barbaric against their own people.  And it is certainly not an organization for the de­struction of a race.  But, of course, it is fre­quently said that this is what the ghettos were really for.  It has been published, re­garding the War­saw Ghetto, a brazen assertion that concentra­tion camps “were a substitute for the practice of cramming the Jews into overcrowded ghettos and starving them to death.”  It seems that whatever security system the Germans used, and to whatever lengths they went to preserve a semblance of commu­nity for the Jews, they can never escape the charge of “extermination”.  Even to the point of requiring national LAWS that prohibit even the “discussion” of possible flaws in the Holo­caust reporting.

 

It has been already established that the 1931 Jewish popula­tion census for Poland placed the number of Jews at 2,732,600, and that after emigration and flight to the So­viet Union, no more than 1,100,000 were under German con­trol.  These incontro­vertible facts, however, do not pre­vent Manvell and Frankl as­serting that “there had been over three million Jews in Poland when Germany began the invasion” and that in 1942 “some two million still awaited death” (ibid. p. 140).  In reality, of the mil­lion or so Jews in Poland, almost half, about 400,000 were eventually concentrated in the ghetto of Warsaw, an area of about two and a-half square miles around the old medieval ghetto.  The remainder had al­ready been moved to the Polish Government-Gen­eral by Septem­ber 1940.  In the summer of 1942, Himmler ordered the reset­ tlement of all Polish Jews in detention camps in order to obtain their labor, part of the system of general concentra­tion for labor assignment in the Govern­ment-General.  Thus be­tween July and October 1942, over three-quarters of the Warsaw Ghetto inhabitants were peacefully evacuated and trans­ported, supervised by the Jewish police themselves.  As you have seen, transportation to camps is al­leged to have ended in “extermination”, but there is ab­solutely no doubt from the evidence available that it involved only the effec­tive procurement of labor and the prevention of unrest.  In the first place, Himmler discovered on a surprise visit to War­saw in January 1943 that 24,000 Jews registered as arma­ments workers were in fact working illegally as tailors and furriers (Manvell & Frankl, ibid. p. 140); the Ghetto was also being used as a base for subversive forays into the main area of War­saw.

 

After six months of peaceful evacuation, when only about 60,000 Jews remained in the residen­tial ghetto, the Germans met with an armed rebellion on 18th January 1943.  Manvell and Frankl admit that “The Jews involved in planned resis­tance had for a long time been en­gaged in smuggling arms from the out­side world, and combat groups fired on and killed S.S. men and militia in charge of a column of depor­tees.”  The terrorists in the Ghetto uprising were also as­sisted by the Polish Home Army and the PPR-Polska Partia Robotnicza, the Commu­nist Polish Workers Party.  It was un­der these circumstances of a revolt aided by parti­sans and communists that the occupying forces, as any army would in a similar situation, moved in to suppress the terrorists, if necessary by destroying the residential area itself.  It should be remembered that the whole process of evacuation would have continued peacefully had not ex­tremists among the inhabitants planned an armed rebellion which in the end was bound to fail.  When S.S. Lieutenant-General Stroop entered the Ghetto with armored cars on April 19th, he immediately came under fire and lost twelve men; German and Polish casu­alties in the battle, which lasted four weeks, totalled 101 men killed and wounded.  Stubborn resis­tance by the Jew­ish Combat Organiza­tion in the face of impossible odds led to an estimated 12,000 Jewish casu­alties, the majority by remain­ing in burning build­ings and dug-outs.  A to­tal, however, of 56,065 inhabitants were captured and peacefully resettled in the area of the Government-General.  Many Jews within the Ghetto had resented the terror imposed on them by the Combat Organi­zation, and had at­tempted to inform on their headquar­ters to the German authori­ties.

 

SUDDEN  SURVIVORS

 

The circumstances surrounding the Warsaw Ghetto revolt, as well as the deportations to east­ern labor camps such as Auschwitz, has led to the most colorful tales concerning the fate of Polish Jews, the largest bloc of Jewry in Europe.  The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, in figures prepared by them for the Nuremberg Trials, stated that in 1945 there were only 80,000 Jews re­maining in Poland.  They also al­leged that there were no Polish-Jewish displaced per­sons left in Germany or Austria, a claim that was at some vari­ance with the number of Polish Jews arrested by the British and Americans for black market activities.  However, the new Communist regime in Poland was unable to prevent a major anti-Jewish pogrom at Kielce on July 4th, 1946, and more than 150,000 Polish Jews suddenly fled into Western Germany.  Their appearance was somewhat embarrassing, and their emi­gration to Palestine and the United States was carried out in record time.  Subsequently, the number of Polish Jewish sur­vivors underwent consider­able revision; in the American-Jewish Year Book 1948-1949 it was placed at 390,000, quite an advance on the original 80,000.  You may expect further revisions upwards in the future as things unfold.

 

SOME  CONCENTRATION  CAMP  MEMOIRS

 

The most influential agency in the propagation of the exter­mination legend has been the paper-back book and magazine in­dustry, and it is through their sensational publications, produced for commercial gain, that the average person is made acquainted with a myth of an entirely politi­cal charac­ter and purpose.  The hey-day of these hate-Germany books was in the 1950’s, when vir­ulent Germano-phobia found a ready market, but the industry continues to flourish and is expe­riencing another boom today and increases by leaps and bounds annually.  The industry’s prod­ucts consist generally of so-called “memoirs”, and these fall into two basic cate­gories: those which are supposedly by former S.S. men, camp commandants and the like, and those bloodcur­dling reminis­cences allegedly by former concentration camp in­mates.

 

COMMUNIST  ORIGINS

 

Here is where you had best begin to pay careful attention so that you get the “hook-up” be­cause this IS, after all, the most elabo­rate plan at One World Government ever on your planet.

Of the first kind, the most outstanding example is COMMAN­DANT OF AUSCHWITZ by Rudolf Hoess (London, 1960), which was originally published in the Polish language as Wspom­nienia by the Communist Government.  Hoess, a young man who took over at Auschwitz in 1940, was first arrested by the British and detained at Flensburg, but he was soon handed over to the Polish Communist authorities who condemned him to death in 1947 and executed him almost immediately.  The so-called Hoess memoirs are undoubtedly false and were produced under Communist auspices, as you shall see, though the Com­munists them­selves claim that Hoess was “ordered to write the story of his life” and a hand-written original supposedly exists, but no one has ever seen it.  Hoess was subjected to incred­ible torture and brain-washing as only the Communist Psy­chopoliticians can inflict it during the period of his ar­rest, and his testimony at Nuremberg was delivered in a mindless mono­tone as he stared blankly into space.  Even Re­itlinger rejects this testimony as hopelessly untrustworthy.  It is indeed remarkable how much of the “evidence” regarding the Six Million stems from Commu­nist sources; this includes the ma­jor documents such as the Wisliceny statement and the Hoess “memoirs”, which are undoubt­edly the two most quoted items in extermina­tion literature, as well as all the infor­mation on the so-called “death camps” such as Auschwitz.  This informa­tion comes from the Jewish His­torical Commission of Poland; the Central Commission for the Investigation of War Crimes, Warsaw; and the Russian State War Crimes Commis­sion, Moscow.

 

Reitlinger acknowledges that the Hoess testimony at Nurem­berg was a catalog of wild exaggera­tions, such as that Auschwitz was disposing of 16,000 people a day, which would mean a total at the end of the war of over 13 million.  In­stead of exposing such estimates for the Soviet-inspired frauds they obviously are, Re­itlinger and others prefer to think that such ridiculous exaggera­tions were due to “pride’ in doing a professional job.  Ironically, this is completely irreconcilable with the supposedly authentic Hoess memoirs, which make a clever attempt at plausibility by suggesting the opposite picture of distaste for the job.  Hoess is sup­posed to have “confessed” to a total of 3 million people ex­terminated at Auschwitz, though at his own trial in Warsaw the prosecution reduced the number to 1,135,000.  However, we have already noted that the Soviet government announced an of­ficial figure of 4 million after their “investigation” of the camp in 1945.  This kind of casual juggling with mil­lions of people does not appear to worry the writers of the extermination litera­ture.

 

A review of the Hoess “memoirs” in all their horrid detail would be tedious.  We may confine ourselves to those aspects of the extermination legend which are designed with the ob­vious pur­pose of forestalling any proof of its falsity.  Such, for example, is the manner in which the alleged exter­mination of Jews is de­scribed.  This was supposed to have been carried out by a “special de­tachment” of Jewish prison­ers.  They took charge of the newly arrived contingents at the camp, led them into the enormous “gas-chambers” and dis­posed of the bodies after­wards.  The S.S., therefore, did very little, so that most of the S.S. personnel at the camp could be left in complete ignorance of the “extermination program”.  Of course, no Jew would ever be found who claimed to have been a member of this gruesome “special detachment”, so that the whole issue is left conveniently unprovable.  It is worth repeating that no living, au­thentic eye-witness of these events has ever been produced.

 

Conclusive evidence that the Hoess memoirs are a forgery lies in an incredible slip by the Com­munist editors.  Hoess is sup­posed to say that the Jehovah’s Witnesses at Auschwitz ap­proved of murdering the Jews because the Jews were the en­emies of Christ.  It is well known that in Soviet Russia to­day and in all her satellite countries of eastern Europe, the Commu­nists conduct a bit­ter campaign of suppression against the Jeho­vah’s Witnesses, whom they regard as the re­ligious sect most dangerous to Communist beliefs.  That this sect is deliberately and grossly defamed in the Hoess mem­oirs proves the docu­ment’s Communist origins beyond any doubt.

 

INCRIMINATING  REMINISCENCES

 

Certainly the most bogus “memoirs” yet published are those of Adolf Eichmann.  Before his ille­gal kidnapping by the Is­raelis in May, 1960 and the attendant blaze of international public­ity, few people had ever hear of him.  He was indeed a relatively unimportant person, the head of Office A4b in De­partment IV (the Gestapo) of the Reich Security Head Office.  His office su­pervised the transportation to detention camps of a particular section of enemy aliens, the Jews.  A posi­tive flood of unadul­terated rubbish about Eichmann showered the world in 1960, of which we may cite as an example Homer Clarke’s EICH­MANN: THE SAVAGE TRUTH.  (“The orgies often went on until six in the morning, a few hours before con­signing the next batch of victims to death,” says Clarke in his chapter “Streamlined Death, Wild Sex Orgies”, p. 124.)

 

Strangely enough, the alleged “memoirs” of Adolf Eichmann suddenly appeared at the time of his abduction to Israel.  They were uncritically published by the American “Life” mag­azine (Nov. 28, Dec. 5, 1960), and were supposed to have been given by Eichmann to a journalist in the Argentine shortly before his capture—an amazing coincidence.  Other sources, however, gave an entirely different account of their origin, claiming that they were a record based on Eichmann’s comments to an “associate” in 1955, though no one even bothered to identify this person.  By an equally ex­traordinary coincidence, war crimes investigators claimed shortly af­terwards to have just “found” in the archives of the U.S. Library of Congress, more than fif­teen years after the war, the “complete file” of Eichmann’s depart­ment.  So far as the “memoirs” themselves are concerned, they were made to be as horribly incriminating as possi­ble without straying too far into the realms of the purest fantasy, and depict Eichmann speak­ing with enor­mous relish about “the physical annihilation of the Jews”.  Their fraudulence is also attested to by various factual errors, such as that Himmler was already in command of the Reserve Army by April of 1944, instead of af­ter the July plot against Hitler’s life, a fact which Eichmann would certainly have known.  The appearance of these “memoirs” at precisely the right moment leaves no doubt that their object was to present a pre-trial propaganda picture of the archetypal “unregenerate Nazi and fiend in human shape”.

 

The circumstances of the Eichmann trial in Israel do not concern us here; the documents of So­viet Origin which were used in evi­dence, such as the Wisliceny statement, have been examined al­ready, and for an account of the third-degree methods used on Eichmann during his captivity to render him “co-operative” the reader is referred to the London Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 2, 1960.  More relevant to the literature of the extermination leg­end are the contents of a letter which Eichmann is supposed to have written voluntarily and handed over to his captors in Buenos Aries.  It need hardly be added that its Israeli authorship is transparently obvi­ous.  Nothing in it stretches human credulity further than the phrase “I am submitting this declara­tion of my own free will,” but the most hollow and revealing statement of all is his alleged willingness to appear before a court in Israel, “so that a true picture may be transmitted to fu­ture genera­tions.”

 

Now you who are in knowledge of possibilities contained herein, please be patient and keep to the subject.  It mat­ters not whether this man was an “imposter”, “synthetic”, “double” or just the “same old man”—for the intent is the same and that is to further deepen the deceit by what­ever means necessary to keep the world from finding out in time to stop the move for world control.

 

TREBLINKA  FABRICATIONS

 

One of the latest reminiscences to appear in print are those of Franz Stangl, the former com­mandant of the camp of Tre­blinka in Poland who was sentenced to life imprisonment in Dec. 1970.  These were published in an article by the London Daily Tele­graph Magazine, Oct. 8, 1971, and were supposed to derive from a series of interviews with Stangl in prison.  He died a few days after the interviews were concluded.  These alleged remi­niscences are certainly the goriest and most bizarre yet pub­lished, though one is grateful for a few admissions by the writer of the article, such as that “the evidence presented in the course of his trial did not prove Stangl him­self to have committed spe­cific acts of murder” and that the account of Stangl’s beginnings in Poland “was in part fabrication”.

 

A typical example of this fabrication was the description of Stangl’s first visit to Treblinka.  As he drew into the railway station there, he is supposed to have seen “thousands of bodies” just strewn around next to the tracks, “hundreds, no, thousands of bodies everywhere, putre­fying, decom­posing”.  And “in the station was a train full of Jews, some dead, some still alive...it looked as if it had been there for days.”  The account reaches the heights of absur­dity when Stangl is alleged to have got out of his car and “stepped kneedeep into money; I didn’t know which way to turn, which way to go.  I waded in papernotes, currency, precious stones, jewelry and clothes.  They were everywhere, strewn all over the square.”  The scene is com­pleted by “whores from Warsaw weaving drunk, dancing, singing, playing music”, who were on the other side of the barbed wire fences.  To liter­ally believe this account of sinking “kneedeep” in Jewish bank-notes and precious stones amid thousands of putrefying corpses and lurching, singing pros­titutes would require the most phe­nomenal degree of gulli­bility, and in any circumstances other than the Six Million leg­end it would be dismissed as the most outra­geous non­sense.

 

The statement which certainly robs the Stangl memoirs of any vestige of authenticity is his al­leged reply when asked why he thought the Jews were being exterminated: “They wanted the Jews’ money,” is the answer.  “That racial business was just secondary.”  The series of inter­views are supposed to have ended on a highly dubious note indeed.  When asked whether he thought there had been “any conceivable sense in this horror”, the former Nazi commandant supposedly replied with enthusi­asm: “Yes, I am sure there was.  Perhaps the Jews were meant to have this enormous jolt to pull them to­gether; to create a peo­ple; to identify themselves with each other”.  One could scarcely imagine a more perfect answer had it been nvented!

 

Let us have a break at this point prior to taking up the so-called Diary of Anne Frank.

 

Thank you,

 

Hatonn

 

http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J040.pdf  

 

April 6, 2011