Could it be that the shadow government (the main government is the front) has to silence the truth and will pull its' next "9-11" on the American people with the shutting down of the internet?  You have to know that the elites want to keep us as ignorant as sheep and controlled so we never learn the truth and hold them accountable for their degeneracy and treason.

Isn't it interesting that Senator Jay Rockefeller of the delightful family Rockefeller, who are controllers of the private-run- for-profit Federal Reserve, that controls our money supply (they create it, own it all and loan it to us at interest instead of the American public owning it), and who have engineered this American financial crisis and all others, has not only stated that it would have been better if the internet would have never been invented, but it is the number one threat to America's security today.

http://www.infowars.com/rockefeller-internet-is-number-one-national-hazard/

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Jay+rockefeller+and+internet+censorship&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

Isn't it interesting that the Internet Patriot Act is alleged to have already been written and is just awaiting implementation?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=internet+pa triot+act+already+written&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

Of course, the internet is a threat to the elites because we get to discover secret facts about them.  We learn about the dirty little secrets about the elites, like financial tyranny, false-flag operations, stealing, treason, Bohemian Grove, secret societies and their plans for world domination, pedophilia and more.  So, here comes the new proposed legislation to control the internet.  Once again, the government is stepping into the private sector and controlling a business that they have no right to control.  If they are so worried about their technology being infiltrated by internet saboteurs, why not simply disconnect their systems from the internet or better yet, create their own internet exclusively for government systems.  Of course, that will never happen for the objective of the legislation has nothing to do with internet or even national security, it has everything to do with stopping us from accessing the truth about the traitors who have betrayed us and every notion of decency.  They have turned a great and Godly nation into the modern-day Babylon.

Watch and see.  The internet false-flag attack is on the way.  They will shut down our internet and blame it on someone else, to justify an invasion that the American people would never otherwise approve, such as an invasion of Iran perhaps?  This time, they will try to do a far better job of covering it than the botched-up mess they made out of 9-11 fra ud, but be rest assured, the internet attack is coming.  The internet will then be censored and controlled, and you will only get the information they say it is ok to get, because the elites do not want us to know about their degeneracy and treason.  Sorry you rats, the genie is already out of the bottle and it can not be put back in, no matter how hard you try!

Yes indeed - history does repeat itself.  Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Somoza, Pinochet, Franco, Pol Pot, Kim Jung Ill, I could go on and on and on....  tyranny continues to return to otherwise free nations, always being "in the best interests of the common good" but the entire time, serving only an elite class of degenerates and traitors.  It looks like a morally and intellectually snoozing America is going to let it happen all over again.

_________________________________________

 

• Home
• Alex Jones Radio Show
  Listen page Listen over the Internet About Alex Jones
• News
  U.S. News World News
• Sections
  Media Police State Big BrotherScience & Technology Ron Paul on the Rise Border Control & Illegal Immigration War on Terror Iraq Iran World at War Globalism Economic Crisis September 11
• Multimedia
  Media Videos The Grove Pho tos Video Clips Interviews
• Prison Planet Forum
• Shop
• Advertise
• Contact
• Search

< TR>

Rockefeller: Internet is “Number One National Hazard”

• Text size
• 
• 

Kurt Nimmo

Infowars

March 23, 2009

According to the great-grandson of John D. Rockefeller, nephew of banker David Rockefeller, and former Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller the internet represents a serious threat to nati onal security. Rockefeller is not alone in this assessment. His belief that the internet is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair.

	Senator Jay Rockefeller pontificates on the threat to national security posed by the internet.

“It really almost makes you ask the question would it have been better if we had never invented the internet,” Rockefeller mused during the confirmation hearing of Gary Locke (see video), Obama’s choice for Commerce Secretary. He then cites a dubious figure of three million cyber “attacks” launched against the Department of Defense every day. “Everybody is at tacked, anybody can do it. People say, well it’s China and Russia, but there could be some kid in Latvia doing the same thing.”

Jay Rockefeller’s comments reveal an astounding degree of ignorance – or if not ignorance, outright propaganda. Since the September 11, 2001, attacks the government has cranked up the fear quotient in regard to cyber attacks and so-called cyber terrorism, a virtually non-existent threat except in the minds security experts and politicians. In the years since the attacks, not one real instance of real cyberterrorism has been recorded.

“Cyberattacks on critical components of the national infrastructure are not uncommon, but they have not been conducted by terrorists and have not sought to inflict the kind of damage that would qualify as cyberterrorism,” writes Gabriel Weimann, author of Terror on the Internet. “Nuclear weapons and other sensitive military systems, as well as the computer systems of the CIA and FBI, are ‘air-gapped,’ making them inaccessible to outside hackers. Systems in the private sector tend to be less well protected, but they are far from defenseless, and nightmarish tales of their vulnerability tend to be largely apocryphal.”

“Psychological, political, and economic forces have combined to promote the fear of cyberterrorism,” Weimann continues. “From a psychological perspective, two of the greatest fears of modern time are combined in the term ‘cyberterrorism.’ The fear of random, violent victimization blends well with the distrust and outright fear of computer technology.”

“The sky is not falling, and cyber-weapons seem to be of limited value in attacking national power or intimidating citizens,” notes James Lewis of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Such a threat is overblown, Lewis explains. He notes that “a brief review suggests that while many computer networks remain very vulnerable to attack, f ew critical infrastructures are equally vulnerable.” In other words, Rockefeller’s example of a kid in Latvia with a laptop posing a serious “hazard” to national security is little more than sensationalistic propaganda.

So-called cyber terrorists are far less of a threat than government. China and Australia have recently imposed draconian censorship on internet freedom. Brazil, Denmark, Canada, Finland, Ireland , Italy, Israel, the United Kingdom, the United States, and many other countries also impose nominal censorship on internet freedom. Urgent calls to restrict the medium in various ways through legislation and government action have increased over the last few years (for more detail, see Internet Censorship: A Comparative Study).

However, the real threat to internet freedom is currently posed by IT and ISP corporations, not the government.

	The Alex Jones Show, June 11, 2008: : Death of the Internet.  Part 2

As Alex Jones explained last June, large corporate ISPs are now in the process of imposing bandwidth caps and routing traffic over their networks and blocking certain targeted websites. For instance, in 2005 AOL Time-Warner was caught blocking access to all of Jones’ flagship websites across the entire United States. Other instances of outright censorship include the UK ISP Tiscali blocking subscribers from reaching material on the 7/7 London bombings and Google’s continued and habitual censorship of 9/11 material and Alex Jones’ films on the ever-popular YouTube. There are many other instances as well. (See Censoring the Internet: A Collection of Essential Links on Infowars.)

Jay Rockefeller’s warning about virtually non-existent and largely absurd cyberterrorism reveals increasing government nervousness and apprehension about the medium as a whole, especially as the internet grows by leaps and bounds as an alternative news and activism medium. On numerous occasions over the last few years alternative websites have posted articles exposing government crime, articles the corporate media has largely ignored. During the Bush years, the internet served as a vital resource for information on everything from torture and the destruction of civil liberties to the invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, information the corporate media was often unable or unwilling to carry.

For instance, earlier this month Infowars broke a story concerning the Missouri Information Analysis Center and its effort to profile Libertarians and Ron Paul supporters as terrorists. The story was subsequently picked up by the corporate media (although Alex Jones and Infowars did not receive attribution).

As more corporate media outlets fail — as evinced by several high profile newspapers going out of business recently — and more people flock to the internet to get their news and information, the government will increasingly employ fear tactics designed to portray the medium as a refuge for terrorists, pedophiles, and other miscreants.

It appears the Obama administration is attempting to micromanage this effort. Last week CNet “obtained a summary of a proposal from Senators Jay=2 0Rockefeller (D-W.V.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) that would create an Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor, part of the Executive Office of the President. That office would receive the power to disconnect, if it believes they’re at risk of a cyberattack, ‘critical’ computer networks from the Internet.” As well, the effort would put the White House National Cybersecurity Advisor in charge of coordinating cyber efforts within the intelligence community and within civilian agencies.

---

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

---

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.

Checked by AVG.

Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.3/1693 - Release Date: 9/26/2008 7:35 AM