in a cold sweat at least once a week, and will probably suffer from nightmares for the rest of their lives. I believe them."

"Under the wide and starry sky, dig the grave and let me lie:

Glad did I live and gladly die, and I laid me down with a will."

'Requiem', Robert Louis StevensonIraq War Crimes Trial Early on 8 June 1972, American "fire" rained from the sky onto Highway 1 outside the South Vietnamese village of Trang Bang. Badly burned by napalm and disoriented by the bomb's impact, 9-year-old Phan Thi Kim Phuc picked herself up, tore off her clothes and stumbled blindly down the road. Though by 1971 millions of Americans were already actively demonstrating against the wanton barbarism in Vietnam, photographer Nick Ut's picture of the terrified Kim Phuc, mouth agape with horror and pain, arms splayed out from her tiny naked body, had a massive impact on millions more angry Americans, many of them women.

A tidal wave of pure revulsion rippled across the United States, as people came to realize that the tiny naked Kim could have been anybody, including their own daughter or sister. The photograph served as absolute proof that American politicians ordered weapons of mass destruction ["jelly fire"] to be dropped on defenseless civilians, which in turn proved military commanders in the field were ready, willing and able to carry out these depraved political directives.

Though the New York media attempted to insinuate that anonymous "intelligence officers" were to blame for the deliberate firebombing of Trang Bang, Nick Ut's photograph proved they were not. The napalm that rained down on the village that day was dropped by U.S. military aircraft on the direct orders of military officers, who in turn were obeying direct political commands from Washington, D.C.

Even more obscene were New York claims that the terrible pictures of little Kim Phuc had been forged by the "Commies", in some sort of desperate but unspecified plot to discredit the honor and dignity of the proud United States armed services. This was a classic example of American imperial hypocrisy at work, with politicians reserving the absolute 'God-given' right to firebomb, torture and kill anyone anywhere in the world at any time, while the media cleaned up the mess behind them, and pretended that the victims were either lying or had brought it upon themselves.

More recently with the release of appalling torture photographs from Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, these absurd claims have surfaced yet again, with New York and its 'alternative media' lackeys trying to insinuate that shadowy anonymous spooks gave "our poor soldiers" orders to "soften up" these Iraqi prisoners for interrogation. This is provable rubbish. No Brigadier General allows mere spooks from Langley or anywhere else to give direct order to his or her subordinate ranks, meaning that what you see is what you get: American soldiers wantonly torturing Iraqi civilian prisoners as a matter of U.S. Government policy, and clearly enjoying the experience.

Believe me when I say that what you seen so far, is merely the tip of a giant iceberg of Invader depravity in Iraq that beggars the imagination. For nearly two months I have been in possession of images far worse than these, in fact so sickening that even as a retired combat veteran myself, they turned my stomach. After receiving the images through Jordan from women's refuges in Iraq and other sources, I agonized week after week about posting them on the Internet, before coming to the conclusion that this would be a practical impossibility, at least until one of America's own "respected" media outlets showed at least some of these disgusting torture pictures, and before an 'alternative media' site in turn tried to pretend that the pack rape images were "staged porn".

It is a sad reflection on western morality today, that in the wake of the attack on the World Trade Center in September 2001, no one is allowed to criticize what "our boys" in the military do, or how they do it. I knew that if I published too soon, and despite my unblemished reputation as a fair and impartial investigator, I would immediately be labeled as a "propagandist" or "agent of a foreign power" in order to detract from the photographs themselves, and from their truly horrifying and thus powerful content.

However, now that CBS has published a handful of relatively tame images from Abu Graib Prison, and World News Daily has followed up with the predictable claim that the far worse rape pictures are in reality extracts from a porn website called "Iraqi Babes", I feel the time is now right to expose a little more of the iceberg of invader depravity in Iraq.

The World News Daily 'investigation' is flimsy at best, and while it accurately reports that "Iraqi Babes" was first created in April 2003, it fails to mention that these specific images were not posted on the site until early 2004. On the evidence so far, it seems certain that "Iraqi Babes" and a handful of other sites are parts of an American COINTELPRO operation, designed to act as catcher's mitts for leaked images, and thus provide a means for the 'alternative media' to stifle justifiable public outrage and dissent.

The likelihood of a sophisticated COINTELPRO operation is strongly reinforced by World News Daily titling its report, Bogus GI rape photos used as Arab propaganda, while at the same time challenging the website, Committee for the Defense of Saddam Hussein and Albasrah, to "remove the photos from the website and admit they are staged images". No respectable website would do this without hard evidence, which WND does not present, and especially not in the face of corroboration from women's refuges inside Iraq.

The decision to publish the pack-rape images shown later in this report is mine alone, and it is final. If you have a weak stomach it is strongly recommended that you read no further, and if you are a politically-correct Zionist lobbyist in New York, do not waste your time exerting untoward pressure on my host servers to remove the report or its images on the grounds of "obscenity", because this page has been correctly marked "xxx". In addition to the server where you are viewing this report today , it has already been mirrored at five other locations. Should you succeed in having the report removed from an existing server, five more mirrors will be generated, and so on. Rest assured that the depraved behavior of Invading troops and mercenaries in Iraq will be visible on the Internet for a very long time to come.

It is a fact that the level of depravity in Iraq today is at least ten times as bad as it was in the bad old days of Vietnam, and has been directly affected by events following in the aftermath of 9-11. When John Walker Lindh was publicly transported back to America in a black sensory-deprivation coffin, and more than 600 'suspects' were unlawfully kidnapped in Afghanistan and transported openly to Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, for comprehensive abuse and advanced torture in defiance of the Geneva Convention and International Law, American perception of human rights was modified on a permanent basis.

When the White House Recently appointed Guantanamo Concentration Camp Commandant Major General Geoffrey D. Miller to "clean up Abu Ghraib Prison" in Iraq, the American public remained curiously silent. This lack of dissent gave the U.S. Administration authority to continue torturing Iraqis, but this time using experts and avoiding publicity. Though very few Americans believe that a bunch of incompetent trainee Muslim Cessna pilots flew two giant Boeing 767 passenger jets into the World Trade Center towers with devastating accuracy at a blistering 575 m.p.h., the media managed to convince most Americans that Muslims in general were 'the enemy', which in turn resulted in tacit public approval of their shocking mistreatment at Camp Delta. Because there were no massed demonstrations in America against this gross abuse of human rights at a United States navy base on American territory, torturing Muslims and treating them as "Untermenschen", the Nazi term for sub-humans of racially or socially inferior groups, gave soldiers and mercenaries alike the 'green light' to do whatever they wanted to Muslims anywhere in the world.

It is perhaps the height of irony that by allowing their own government to torture Muslims in Guantanamo Bay, Americans in general have opened themselves up to almost unbelievable Orwellian restrictions on the mainland, courtesy of the totalitarian lobbies in New York and Washington. Those 600+ tortured souls down at Camp Delta are the only visible hard proof of the phony Zionist-manufactured "War on Terror". The entire camp is an 'icon' used to distort reality for the American public, and thus permit gross totalitarian excesses at home in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York.

If all Americans pulled together, held mass demonstrations, and demanded that these 600 Muslim men be released and returned to their homes, the phoney "War on Terror" would collapse almost overnight. Without their visible 'terror icon' at Guantanamo Bay, the totalitarians would be left floundering around trying to justify their insane behavior. During the nine hundred and fifty-six days that have elapsed since the anonymous attack on the World Trade Center, not one person in America has been killed by a "Muslim Terrorist". Let me repeat that just one more time for absolute clarity: During the nine hundred and fifty-six days that have elapsed since the anonymous attack on the World Trade Center, not one person in America has been killed by a "Muslim Terrorist".

What would Rothschild, Cheney, Sharon, Wolfowitz and Perle do then? How would they convince Americans to go on submitting to crude body searches at every airport across the land, and how would they convince naïve young American soldiers to go and get themselves killed in the Iraqi desert for the greater good of Zionist crude oil? They would not be able to do so, and America would then have a very slim chance of returning to the carefree country that it used to be. However, leave Camp Delta intact, and this will never happen. Instead, those 600 pitiful Muslim men will be used as a constant media cattle prod, to spur all of you on to greater and greater human rights excesses both at home and abroad.

One of the biggest problems facing ordinary American citizens today, is trying to determine exactly who is doing what to whom in Iraq. During the last year the U.S. Administration has hired more than 40,000 "independent contractors" for Iraq, with more than 20,000 of these being armed mercenaries operating under exactly the same remit as the notorious Operation Phoenix in Vietnam. The sole mission of Phoenix personnel was to terrorize the Vietnamese into submission using "whatever means necessary". Though this remit is chillingly non-specific, two personal friends who were directly involved in Phoenix all those years ago, tell me that they still break out in a cold sweat at least once a week, and will probably suffer from nightmares for the rest of their lives. I believe them.

After piecing together the available evidence from more than 400 known cases of pack rape in Iraq, the women's refuges are of the combined view that about 80% were perpetrated by American-controlled mercenary groups rather than by line military soldiers, but they cannot be absolutely sure. This is due partly to the sheer terror of the victims at the time, and because some victims [including those whose faces you see on this page] were brutally murdered when their tormentors had finished abusing them. Please note that I have made no attempt to obscure the faces of the men involved. If you, a friend or contact can positively identify any one of them, please contact your local FBI office as quickly as possible. Your testimony will remain strictly confidential, and you will be provided with witness protection if it is considered necessary.

Writing on a subject as delicate as this is incredibly difficult to start with, made even harder nowadays because so many Americans are on the defensive, determined to shield American "honor" no matter what the price. On this subject it is wise to remember that informed patriotism is highly desirable and very healthy, but blind patriotism is incredibly dangerous. This fact was brought home to me on 14 April, when I wrote an accurate report about rogue American officers destroying U.S. Marine Corps honor, by ordering their subordinates to slaughter unarmed women and children in Fallujah, the City of Mosques, with heavy weapons including tanks, Cobra gunships and AC-130 Spectre flying battleships. As usual, independent verification was provided three days later by eminent war correspondent John Pilger, and by the highly respected Médecins Sans Frontières, but this was all way too late for 'alternative' American website Rumor Mill News.

Within hours of the report being published, my work was "banned for ever" by website owner Rayelan Allan, who indulged herself in an incredibly long rant against me personally, including, " What were my doubts? That he [Vialls] was working for one of the alphabet agencies spewing carefully constructed disinformation that none of the rest of us are smart enough or have the sources to verify! You want to bitch about my decision... take it to God like... I will not have inflammatory lies like the kind Joe Vialls posted put up on Rumor Mill News".

While having no idea what an "alphabet agency" might or might not be, my work contained no lies at all. More than a thousand Iraqi residents were killed in Fallujah [their own town in their own country], by massive and indiscriminate U.S. Marine firepower brought to bear by rogue officers, some of them JINSA members. In the end they [The U.S. Marines] got themselves into such a mess that General Kimmitt panicked and handed the city back to Iraqi Republican Guard General Jassim Mohammed Saleh, and one thousand of his men. While the word "defeat" would probably stick in the throats of most Americans, be absolutely clear on one point. The fanatical General Kimmitt would not have handed Fallujah back to the Republican Guard if he had any other choice. The reality is that Kimmitt had no other choice, and there will be a heavy price to pay sometime in the future for the wanton mass murder of all those Iraqi citizens.

Ms Allan also wrote, "Vialls' post is an insult and a slap in the face to every Marine that has ever lived!! I sincerely hope that Mr. Vialls is not living where a Marine can find him! If he is, he had better find some cover until this blows over!" Clearly this was intended as a direct threat against my life, because it is impossible to interpret the words any other way. Let me just say this. My address is displayed on the home page of this website, meaning that locating me is no problem at all. However, any Marine directly involved in the cowardly murder of unarmed women and children in Fallujah should note that I am an extremely angry combat veteran. Because of the heinous war crimes you have personally committed in Iraq, you bring shame and dishonor on every uniformed fighting man who has ever served, regardless of his national flag. In short, wear your dog tags and bring your own body bag, Marine, so we can air freight you back to the correct address in America.

For the sake of those honorable Americans determined to do something about the totalitarian maniacs currently running their country, it is probably time to take a quick look at George Orwell's chilling novel "1984". In 1984, Winston Smith lives in London which is part of the country Oceania. The world is divided into three countries that include the entire globe: Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia. Oceania, and both of the others, is a single totalitarian society led by Big Brother, which censors everyone's behavior, even their thoughts. Winston is disgusted with his oppressed life and secretly longs to join the fabled Brotherhood, a supposed group of underground rebels intent on overthrowing the government.

George Orwell was an exceedingly clever and devious man, because I had to read "1984" from cover to cover four times, before the subtle underlying message became clear. What George Orwell was actually describing was "democracy", the overwhelming confidence trick designed to control us all in the west. Taken in the American context, Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia represent the Presidency, the Republican and the Democrat parties, all of them directly answerable to Big Brother, i.e. the Zionist Cabal in New York.

Regardless of whether Americans vote for Bush or Kerry at the forthcoming elections, most already know from bitter experience that nothing will change. Election promises will be made of course, but they will inevitably be broken by remote control from Wall Street, by Big Brother. Americans next year will be no better off than they were last year, and things may even get worse, brought about by the increasingly totalitarian nature of the bureaucracy.

In "1984" the Ministry of Truth [the media] constantly changes truth for lies in order to generate something for people to cheer about, because people need to be kept busy, and more importantly, they all need something to believe in. Thus for example Oceania may score a victory over Eurasia, giving reason for wild joy and celebration, though of course there is nothing real to cheer about, and people's humdrum lives will not change at all. This is identical to the run up to the American presidential elections this year. People will shout themselves hoarse and give their hard-earned money to a Republican or Democrat who they already know will do nothing for them.

Let us assume that the average American spends about $10.00 on his "chosen" party, whether this be in terms of a direct donation, or for gasoline to get to the voting station. Now think what would happen if even 20% of eligible American voters suddenly decided to withhold their collective $10.00 contributions, and spent the massive resulting sum on a street campaign to "Free The Inmates of Camp Delta". At a single stroke, Big Brother would be neutered, the fictional "War on Terror" would collapse, and American totalitarianism with it. If you think this is a pipe dream, think again. Apart from being easily possible, it would actually cost you nothing you would not otherwise have spent, and would be the first step back along the dusty and forgotten road to American freedom.

Viewed in the short term, this is probably the only viable option left apart from simply waiting for the second American Civil War, though this time around the boot will probably be on the other foot. When the gunsmoke in Iraq finally clears and Americans wake up to the reality that the only oil reserves they have are in the United States, someone somewhere is going to realize with a jolt that approximately 90% of those reserves are contained within the boundaries of the old "Confederate South". Which all leads me to wonder exactly how much hard cash a New York banker will have to pay Johnny Reb, each and every time he wants to fill his flash Mercedes Benz with gas…

One of the "American" guards in Abu Ghraib Prison

From Counterpunch

Much has been made of the sexual humiliation of the men incarcerated by the Crusaders in Abu Ghraib Prison. However the abuse of the female prisoners at Abu Ghraib, and other prisons in Iraq, have gone nearly unnoticed. Although it took photographs to wake the world’s attention to the shenanigans, within the cells, it was actually a letter scribed by a woman prisoner that first exposed what was going on in the infamous prison. The contents of a note that was smuggled out of the prison were so shocking that, at first, Amal Kadham Swadi and the other Iraqi women lawyers who had been trying to gain access to the jail found them hard to believe. It claimed that US guards had been raping women detainees. Several of the women were now pregnant, it added. The women had been forced to strip naked in front of men, it said.

Swadi, one of seven female lawyers now representing women detainees in Abu Ghraib, began to piece together a picture of systemic abuse and torture perpetrated by US guards against Iraqi women held in detention without charge. This was not only true of Abu Ghraib, she discovered, but was, as she put it, “happening all across Iraq”. In November 2003, Swadi visited a woman detainee at a US military base at al-Kharkh, a former police compound in Baghdad. “She was the only woman who would talk about her case. She was crying. She told us she had been raped,” Swadi says. “Several American soldiers had raped her. She had tried to fight them off and they had hurt her arm. She showed us the stitches. She told us, ‘We have daughters and husbands. For God's sake don't tell anyone about this.’” During Swadi’s visit to Abu Ghraib in March, one of the prisoners told her that she had been forced to undress in front of US soldiers. “The Iraqi translator turned his head in embarrassment,” she said.

The Taguba inquiry has corroborated the contents of the letter smuggled out of Abu Ghraib by a woman known only as "Noor". The enquiry found the letter to be entirely in line with the activities going on within the prison. While most of the focus since the scandal broke three weeks ago has been on the abuse of men, and on their sexual humiliation in front of US women soldiers, there is now incontrovertible proof that women detainees have also been abused. Among the 1,800 digital photographs taken by US guards inside Abu Ghraib there are, according to Taguba's report, images of a US military policeman “having sex” with an Iraqi woman. Taguba discovered that guards have also videotaped and photographed naked female detainees. Bush refused to release other photographs of Iraqi women forced at gunpoint to bare their breasts (although Congress were shown them) - ostensibly to prevent attacks on US soldiers in Iraq. However in reality this is merely to prevent further domestic embarrassment.

Earlier this month it emerged that an Iraqi woman in her 70s had been harnessed and ridden like a donkey at Abu Ghraib and another coalition detention centre after being arrested last July. UK Labour MP Ann Clwyd, who investigated the case and found it to be true, said, “She was held for about six weeks without charge. During that time she was insulted and told she was a donkey.”

Several women are housed in solitary confinement, within cells 2.5m long by 1.5m wide. There remain extremely troubling questions as to why these women came to be classified as “security detainees” - a term invented by the Crusaders to justify the indefinite detention of prisoners without charge or legal access, as part of the war on terror. According to Swadi, who managed to visit Abu Ghraib in late March, the allegations against the women are "absurd". "One of them is supposed to be the mistress of the former director of the Mukhabarat. In fact, she's a widow who used to own a small shop. She also worked as a taxi driver, ferrying children to and from kindergarten. If she really had a relationship with the director of the Mukhabarat, she would scarcely be running a kiosk. These are baseless charges," she adds angrily. "She is the only person who can provide for her children."

The women appear to have been arrested - not because of anything they have done, but merely because of who they are married to, and their potential intelligence value. US officials have previously acknowledged detaining Iraqi women in the hope of convincing male relatives to provide information; when US soldiers raid a house and fail to find a male suspect, they will frequently take away his wife or daughter instead.

The horrific abuses that are taking place in the prisons of Iraq have come to symbolise the horrific nature of the Iraqi crusade in general. The brutality of the six military personal, that happened to get caught out, is the logical continuum of the occupation. Bush may claim that these abuses have only been committed by six sick individuals and their behaviour “does not represent the America that I know,” as he proclaimed on Arabic television. All the evidence now points to the facts that Donald Rumsfeld, authorised physical coercion and sexual humiliation in Iraqi prisons. America’s political establishment actively encouraged the abuse. Donald Rumsfeld was hand picked by Bush, who was chosen by a minority, and a Court, to be the president of the USA. Therefore the behaviour of the six is wholly representative of the American way.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------