Missile Strike Downs San Francisco Plane, News Blackout Ordered (Updated Sept. 13, 2010)
Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
According to Western reports of this catastrophe, a massive explosion hit San Francisco last evening around 6 p.m. on a hillside near Interstates 280 and 380, in a residential area named San Bruno that is about two miles west of San Francisco International Airport and was so loud and devastating that some officials initially suspect that a plane had smashed into the ground.
One witness to this catastrophe that has left an estimated 170 houses engulfed in flames, named Jane Porcelli, 62, who lives on a hill above where the fire was centered, reported she heard a plane overhead with a struggling engine and was quoted as saying, “And then you heard this bang. And everything shook except the floor, so we knew it wasn't an earthquake.”
So catastrophic was this explosion that initial reports state that all power to San Bruno was knocked out and that the crater where the remains of the shot down airliner hit is estimated to be over 50 feet in diameter with one witness, Don Ford, a photo journalist, stating that “tomorrow morning when the sun comes up it’s going to be something out of Dante”
Important to note about this catastrophe is that within 1 hour of the still unidentified plane being shot down, American authorities ordered a “news blackout” of the true events surrounding this massive explosion and have, instead, directed their propaganda media organs to blame it on a gas line break, without, of course, mentioning that, according to the Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s own website showing where all of its gas lines are located, none of them that are able to cause such destruction come even close to the area hit.
To the reason behind the missile strike on this US plane, this GRU report states one of the “most likely” causes is due to the planned burning of Islamic religious texts by an American preacher due to occur this Saturday on the 9th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks upon the United States.
This GRU report further states that this attack may also be in retaliation for the indiscriminate killing of Afghan civilians by American Soldiers, 12 of whom have just been indicted by the US Army for their forming a “kill team” that the British Guardian reports “blew up and shot Afghan civilians at random and collected their fingers as trophies”, a war crime, mind you, that was sanctioned this past July by one of their top commanders, General James Mattis, when he declared that it was “fun to shoot people” in Afghanistan.
Not to be overlooked, this GRU report continues, is the possible involvement of Mexican drug cartels behind this attack due to the fears raised by the American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this past week when she compared Mexico’s drug war [which has caused over 28,000 deaths to date] to an insurgency and hinted that US Troops may need to intervene.
Though President Obama was quick to rebuff his own Secretary of State, this GRU report warns that the damage might already have been done and raising greater fears of an all-out war between Mexican drug cartels and the United States. [Note: According to Reuters News Service, Obama's comments were printed in Spanish and no English transcript was available from the White House]
To whoever is really behind this catastrophic attack it is not in our knowing.
What is in our knowing, however, is that just like the fateful events of the aforementioned 9/11 attacks on the United States, the American people, as always, will be kept from knowing the truth.
And nowhere is this more evident than in the first news reports the American people viewed on September 11, 2001, and which honestly stated that no plane had crashed into the Pentagon, there weren’t even any plane fragments evident.
So today, and just like 9/11, another American catastrophe is being propagandized into something it isn’t leaving those, like us, who tell the truth to be demonized for daring to tell the truth.
And sadly, the ones who lose the most are the American people themselves, who, once again, will be convinced that this catastrophe is due to a pipeline explosion, in spite of the many witnesses who saw the plane being struck by a missile.
And to those witnesses, who dare to tell the truth, listen to this warning of what your government will do to keep you from being heard:
www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1404.htm
Sept. 10, 2010
#1 (Reply)
To Whom It May Concern,
Some observations of the report from What Does It Mean.com regarding the San Bruno CA fire trajedy of 9/9/2010.
Early reports on the internet, prior to the news black out, included eyewitness reports of an airplane in trouble and a “fireball” explosion in the sky before any ground fire(s) started. What we have to watch out for in a trajedy like this is any cover up or news black out activity as of the kind that occurred with the BP fiasco. The Truth will not and cannot be hidden any longer. The claims of multiple eye witnesses will surface. The 50' crater from a crash that did not occur will have to be dealt with. Hospital and mortuary records, unless totally destroyed, will be retrieved.
I am a bit puzzled that the author of this What Does It Mean report can say that a Russian satellite has “unmistakingly” identified that 2 Russian made portable missiles (9K34 Strela-3) downed an airliner near the San Francisco international airport, yet the Russian satellite did not identify the airliner, as it easily could.
Is this information being held back? If so, why? How is it that this satellite happened to be focused on these coordinates to begin with? There are many photos available to show what a 9K34 Strela-3 looks like. Why did the author chose a photo of people in mid-east dress holding the weapon to give a view of the weapon? Are these the only people in the world that can obtain this military weapon?
Some sources report that there are an estimated 500,000 MANPADS missile type weapons in supply throughout the globe (proliferation policy) but only two reputable big time producers: Russia and the US. The US FIM-92 Stinger (Raytheon) is high tech with a range of nearly 15,000 feet and requires 2 or more personnel to operate. The Russian made 9K34 Strela can be fired by one person with out high guidance sighting and has an effective range of only 4200 feet. So if this Russian made missile was used, as the author states, The airliner would have to be below the 5000 foot ceiling, making it quite visible to witnesses. For the sake of comparisons some photos are included. It remains to be made known. Is this another false flag disquise and event? Target practice on a drone? A form of retaliation?
With Concern For Those Suffering Harm,
AM