A startling report is circulation in the Kremlin today stating that President Obama’s top aide, and his only official representative at the Davos World Economic Summit, Valerie Jarrett, was instructed by the new American leader to ‘inform’ Prime Minister Putin that the United States is in its ‘final phases’ of ‘taking down’ the powerful private European banking systems known as the Federal Reserve System that has controlled the US economy since 1913, and is currently attempting to destroy it.

According to these reports, President Obama’s plan to destroy the Federal Reserve System involves the creation of a new National Bank of the United States that would be completely owned by the US Government and would begin its new role by acquiring the home mortgages of American citizens, now called ‘toxic assets’, from the corrupt European Banking Empire run by the Rothschild Family after which it would then Nationalize all US Banks.

Leaked reports from Davos are further confirming this astounding news, and as we can read as reported by the CNBC News Service in their report titled “All Big US Banks Must Go to Fix Crisis”, and as we can read:

“The creation of a government bad bank to buy toxic assets is necessary, but then the government will need to take control of and restructure major banks to fix the system, one economist at the World Economic Forum in Davos told CNBC.com. “They have to do a bad bank,” Harvard Economics Professor Ken Rogoff said. But “if that's all they do then it's idiotic.”

Institutions like Citi and Bank of America will have to go, boards will have to be fired and equity stakeholders will be wiped out, Rogoff said. The plan could mirror the one Sweden implemented, where all troubled banks were nationalized, their balance sheets were cleaned up and the good parts of the businesses were sold to the private sector.”

But, to the most shocking revelations made in this report about the new Obama Regime was Ms. Jarrett’s directly stating to Putin that the new American President was ‘going after all of the Zionists’ in his country, a reference to the most radical element of the Jewish peoples many hold responsible for the destruction of the morals, educational and family structures, and the economy of the United States for their own corrupt gain.

Virtually unknown to the American people is that their new President Obama, and his top aide Valerie Jarrett, have longstanding ties with the most powerful Black Muslim leader in the United States, Louis Farrakhan, and as we can read as reported the American Spectator News Service in their special report titled “Obama's Farrakhan Problem”, and which says:

“Barack Obama has a Louis Farrakhan problem and not because of his endorsement from Farrakhan. Instead, it is because of Obama's more-than-passing association with Farrakhan and those who are close to the Nation of Islam leader.

In spite of Farrakhan's long history as a racist, bigot and anti-Semite, Obama thought favorably enough of him to join Farrakhan's 1995 march on Washington, D.C. Reportedly, Obama joined Reverends Jeremiah Wright and Al Sharpton in organizing the march.

Farrakhan's bona fides as a purveyor of hate are well-documented. He called Jews "bloodsuckers," Judaism a "gutter religion" and referred to Adolf Hitler as a "great man." Farrakhan said, "The God who taught me calls the white man the skunk of the planet earth."

Farrakhan promoted the anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that "the AIDS epidemic is a result of doctors, especially Jewish ones, who inject the AIDS virus into blacks." According to Farrakhan, blacks are prevented from progressing in the arts, sports, academia and politics because of Jews. "When I talk to the Jews, I am talking to a segment of that quorum that holds my people in their grip," he told the Chicago Sun-Times.

Obama admitted to showing interest in the Black Muslim faith when he was in his 20s. "I would occasionally pick up the paper [The Final Call, the Nation of Islam's newspaper] ... sometimes because my attention was caught by the sensational, tabloid-style headlines (CAUCASIAN WOMAN ADMITS: WHITES ARE THE DEVIL)," he wrote in Dreams. "Inside the front cover, one found reprints of the minister's speeches, as well as stories that could have been picked straight off the AP news wire were it not for certain editorial embellishments ("Jewish Senator Metzenbaum announced today ...")."

Renewed scrutiny of Obama's decades-long associations is not helpful to his candidacy especially considering the concerns of many in the Jewish community over Obama's ties to noted anti-Semites and critics of Israel. It has not gone unnoticed that it was not until after he began his presidential run that Obama first offered mild criticism of Louis Farrakhan.”

It is important to note that Obama’s reference to these Zionists he is battling against are not a reference to the Jewish peoples, or their religion, as a whole as Zionism is an International political movement that was formally established by the Austro-Hungarian journalist Theodor Herzl in the late 19th century and since that time has been blamed for the Communist takeover of Russia in 1919, World War I and World II, and the current collapse of the United States.

President Obama also becomes the first leader since the late President Nixon to attempt to dislodge from his country the Zionists seeking the destruction of the United States, and his visit, prior to assuming office, with Britain’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown last April gives us, perhaps, the greatest insight into his thoughts, and as we can read as reported by The Sun News Service in their article titled “Obama inspired by Churchill”, and which says:

“Gordon Brown chatted with US presidential hopeful Barack Obama about Winston Churchill – as they met for the first time. Mr. Obama proudly told the Prime Minister he once sat in Sir Winston’s reading chair during a visit to Number 10 in 2005.”

Now, what makes this insight into Obama about his admiration of the late Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and in the context of this new Presidents battle against the Zionist banking powers destroying his Nation, one needs only to read Churchill’s February 8, 1920, essay published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald titled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”, and which in part the Great British War Leader Churchill says:

“Some people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world.

This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

It is also important to note that Obama is not entering into his battle against the Zionists alone, as reports from the United States are showing the broad outline of forces he has arrayed on his side for this historic struggle, and as we can read as reported by Israel’s Haaretz News Service in their article titled “For first time, U.S. professors call for academic and cultural boycott of Israel”, and which says:

“In the wake of Operation Cast Lead, a group of American university professors has for the first time launched a national campaign calling for an academic and cultural boycott of Israel.

While Israeli academics have grown used to such news from Great Britain, where anti-Israel groups several times attempted to establish academic boycotts, the formation of the United States movement marks the first time that a national academic boycott movement has come out of America. Israeli professors are not sure yet how big of an impact the one-week-old movement will have, but started discussing the significance of and possible counteractions against the campaign.

“As educators of conscience, we have been unable to stand by and watch in silence Israel's indiscriminate assault on the Gaza Strip and its educational institutions,” the U.S. Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel stated in its inaugural press release last Thursday. Speaking in its mission statement of the “censorship and silencing of the Palestine question in U.S. universities, as well as U.S. society at large," the group follows the usual pattern of such boycotts, calling for “non-violent punitive measures" against Israel, such as the implementation of divestment initiatives, “similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era.”

Not only has Obama enlisted this domestic support among his own people in his battle against the Zionists, he has further unleashed against them American’s most stalwart Muslim ally Turkey, whose Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, stormed out of the Davos Summit yesterday after calling Israel’s Zionist leaders ‘killers of children’, and as we can read:

“Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan received a hero's welcome upon his return to Istanbul on Friday, a day after storming off the stage at the World Economic Forum in Davos, red-faced from verbally sparring with President Shimon Peres over the recent fighting in Gaza.

Upon his return to Istanbul, Erdogan told a news conference that his anger over the operation in Gaza and Peres' remarks was directed not at Jews, but at the Israeli administration. “Our people would have expected the same reaction from any Turkish prime minister,” he told a news conference at Ataturk airport on Friday morning after speaking to a cheering crowd.

“This was a matter of the esteem and prestige of my country. Hence, my reaction had to be clear. I could not have allowed anyone to poison the prestige and in particular the honor of my country,” he said.

“Our reproaches are not against the Israeli people or Jews. Our reproach is totally against the Israeli administration,” Erdogan said.”  

Obama has further allied himself with former American President Jimmy Carter, and who as we can read has unapologetically launched his own attack against these Zionists:

“Jimmy Carter, the former US president who brokered the Egyptian-Israeli Camp David peace accords in 1978 finds himself, like George W. Bush, in a fight for his legacy.

“As you know," says Carter, "I've been called an anti-Semite, I've been called a bigot, I've been called senile, I've been called a liar, I've been called a plagiarist. This is hurting me."

A Nobel peace prize winner and deeply religious man, Carter has done what no US president has: throw in his lot with the Palestinian cause and overtly attacked Israel's policies. In a country settled by puritans and disaffected Protestants who identified with the Jewish narrative - that a divine destiny had taken them to the Promised Land - support for Israel runs deep; religiously, culturally, financially.

Which is why Carter's new best-selling book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid is creating such deep ructions in the US and abroad. It was released in November and ever since Carter has been in the headlines. The use of the word apartheid particularly has angered many. The Afrikaans word translated as "apartness" is a loaded term, referring to South Africa's infamous era spanning the 1950s to the early '90s when racial segregation was institutionalised.”

It is further instructive to note that Obama allies, and political mentors against the Zionists, John Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, the Robert and Renee Belfer Professor of International Affairs at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, began their Nation’s unprecedented attack immediately prior to Obama’s historic run for the US Presidency with the publication of their seminal 2006 treatise “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy”, and which in part stated:

“For the past several decades, and especially since the Six-Day War in 1967, the centrepiece of US Middle Eastern policy has been its relationship with Israel. The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related effort to spread ‘democracy’ throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardised not only US security but that of much of the rest of the world. This situation has no equal in American political history. Why has the US been willing to set aside its own security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of another state?

This extraordinary generosity might be understandable if Israel were a vital strategic asset or if there were a compelling moral case for US backing. But neither explanation is convincing. One might argue that Israel was an asset during the Cold War. By serving as America’s proxy after 1967, it helped contain Soviet expansion in the region and inflicted humiliating defeats on Soviet clients like Egypt and Syria. It occasionally helped protect other US allies (like King Hussein of Jordan) and its military prowess forced Moscow to spend more on backing its own client states. It also provided useful intelligence about Soviet capabilities.

Backing Israel was not cheap, however, and it complicated America’s relations with the Arab world. For example, the decision to give $2.2 billion in emergency military aid during the October War triggered an Opec oil embargo that inflicted considerable damage on Western economies. For all that, Israel’s armed forces were not in a position to protect US interests in the region. The US could not, for example, rely on Israel when the Iranian Revolution in 1979 raised concerns about the security of oil supplies, and had to create its own Rapid Deployment Force instead.

The first Gulf War revealed the extent to which Israel was becoming a strategic burden. The US could not use Israeli bases without rupturing the anti-Iraq coalition, and had to divert resources (e.g. Patriot missile batteries) to prevent Tel Aviv doing anything that might harm the alliance against Saddam Hussein. History repeated itself in 2003: although Israel was eager for the US to attack Iraq, Bush could not ask it to help without triggering Arab opposition. So Israel stayed on the sidelines once again.

Israel is often portrayed as David confronted by Goliath, but the converse is closer to the truth. Contrary to popular belief, the Zionists had larger, better equipped and better led forces during the 1947-49 War of Independence, and the Israel Defence Forces won quick and easy victories against Egypt in 1956 and against Egypt, Jordan and Syria in 1967 – all of this before large-scale US aid began flowing. Today, Israel is the strongest military power in the Middle East. Its conventional forces are far superior to those of its neighbours and it is the only state in the region with nuclear weapons.

Egypt and Jordan have signed peace treaties with it, and Saudi Arabia has offered to do so. Syria has lost its Soviet patron, Iraq has been devastated by three disastrous wars and Iran is hundreds of miles away. The Palestinians barely have an effective police force, let alone an army that could pose a threat to Israel. According to a 2005 assessment by Tel Aviv University’s Jaffee Centre for Strategic Studies, ‘the strategic balance decidedly favours Israel, which has continued to widen the qualitative gap between its own military capability and deterrence powers and those of its neighbours.’ If backing the underdog were a compelling motive, the United States would be supporting Israel’s opponents.

That Israel is a fellow democracy surrounded by hostile dictatorships cannot account for the current level of aid: there are many democracies around the world, but none receives the same lavish support. The US has overthrown democratic governments in the past and supported dictators when this was thought to advance its interests – it has good relations with a number of dictatorships today.

Some aspects of Israeli democracy are at odds with core American values. Unlike the US, where people are supposed to enjoy equal rights irrespective of race, religion or ethnicity, Israel was explicitly founded as a Jewish state and citizenship is based on the principle of blood kinship. Given this, it is not surprising that its 1.3 million Arabs are treated as second-class citizens, or that a recent Israeli government commission found that Israel behaves in a ‘neglectful and discriminatory’ manner towards them. Its democratic status is also undermined by its refusal to grant the Palestinians a viable state of their own or full political rights.

So if neither strategic nor moral arguments can account for America’s support for Israel, how are we to explain it?

The explanation is the unmatched power of the Israel Lobby. We use ‘the Lobby’ as shorthand for the loose coalition of individuals and organisations who actively work to steer US foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction. This is not meant to suggest that ‘the Lobby’ is a unified movement with a central leadership, or that individuals within it do not disagree on certain issues. Not all Jewish Americans are part of the Lobby, because Israel is not a salient issue for many of them. In a 2004 survey, for example, roughly 36 per cent of American Jews said they were either ‘not very’ or ‘not at all’ emotionally attached to Israel.”

It is further crucial for our greatest understanding of these events to note that the Vatican has openly joined with Obama, (whose Vice President, Joseph Biden, is one of the top Jesuits in America) in his battle against these Zionists, and as we can read:

“The Central Council of Jews in Germany is breaking off contact with the Roman Catholic Church because of Pope Benedict XVI's rehabilitation of a bishop who has denied the scale of the Holocaust, its president said Thursday.

Last weekend, the pope lifted the excommunication of four traditional Catholic bishops, including the British-born Richard Williamson, who has made statements denying the full extent of the Holocaust of European Jews.

Williamson said in an interview with Swedish television a week ago that he believed that there were no gas chambers and that no more than 300,000 Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps, rather than the six million widely accepted by historians.

“Under these conditions, there will certainly be no talks between myself and the church for the time being - I stress the words 'for the time being,"' Charlotte Knobloch, president of the Council of Jews, said in the Rheinische Post newspaper. "I would like an outcry in the church against such actions from the pope.”

To our greatest understanding of the coming catastrophic battles to come over Obama’s war against the Zionists, however, comes from Sister Sonam Tashi’s book “The Power Of Things…The Aryan Symbols Of Hope”, and wherein she shows the true meaning of the tri-colors (Red, White and Blue) becoming the ‘new symbol of power’ for those Nations preparing for Total Global War, and which now include The United States, Britain, France and Russia, and the Sorcha Faal’s words contained in her book “Battle Begins For Throne of This World: The Return of the Einherjar Warriors”, and wherein she warned:

“On July 4, 1996, the 3,000 anniversary of the establishment of Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel by King David, and the 220th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America, British Prime Minister Ron Major announced that the “Jeremiah Stone”, also known as “The Stone of Scone”, was to be removed from its 700-year-long resting place in Westminster Abbey and returned to Scotland where it had been stolen by King Edward I in 1296.

To the greatest significance, however, of this historic event, and as Sorcha Faal details in her new book, “Battle Begins For Throne of This World: The Return of the Einherjar Warriors”, lies not in the year of the Jeremiah Stone being moved, 1996, but that 2008 marks the year that the “12 Cycles of the Zodiac” have been passed since the moving and which, according to the ancient prophecies, shows that this coming year marks the beginning of the Battle for the Throne of this World.”

Unfortunately, and as is always the case, the American people remain the least knowledgeable of the catastrophic events about to surround them on all sides.  Without a doubt, it is a certainty that even our attempts to educate these peoples about the titanic forces being arrayed for, and against them, will be met with cruel disdain, ridicule and scorn.

But, even in their worst attacks against all of those, including us, continually trying to warn them about what is to come, these deluded peoples cannot deny the simple truths of what is happening to themselves and their Nation as they both continue their dark plunge into the abyss

[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one.  No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.] .

Translation to Spanish by: Sister Maru Barraza, Mazatlán, Mexico

www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1199.htm