Custom Search

Barack Obama and the Conspiracy Theorists

Dick Eastman

uest of United States governance, so self-righteously sure that he is on the side of history and mankind in the destruction of bourgeois liberalism, of what America stood for to Franklin, Jefferson, Paine and Madison, of his superiority to all that, as he and his pals are secretly gloriying in the this new triumph of the communist conspiracy. The cat that swallowed the canary. The the standardized intellectual servant of the Red Money Power doing his job of giving the scientifically devised "party line" lies to the plebians who think that the election victory was all about skin color and America's racist past. (The Chinese and the Jews are the worlds greatest racists, not the Americans or the Moslems who are among the world's most tolerant people. Yet the Jews make the Hollywood movies which depict Americans as homicidal psychotics.)

The men of Goldman Sachs are the same. They have the power of Finance Capitalism and they use it for predatory destruction of American society and of all liberal societies and national economies around the world -- justifying their aquisition of power and their use of power to harm billions of people with the excuse that they are really at heart communists bringing about a better world by destroying capitalism from within. No capitalist who was not also a communist could do such evil.

They have brought this country to ruin with their conspiracy and they are proud of it, yet their dialectics, their revolutionary doctrines, their scientific socialism are all as be-nighted a superstition as any "opiate of the people" on earth. The communist analysis of exploitation, of labor, of value, of science is all wrong and absurd, but there is no telling that to these "true believers." The Goldman Sachs communist must know it is not true -- but they nevertheless go through the motions of believing the religion because 1) being part of the great communist conspiracy game as played with Gramsci rules is so much fun; 2) the top players are all Jewish which gives this game which seeks world conquest a definite razenkampf (group conflict) Jewish supremacist incentive that is so omni-satisfying if you are Jewish; 3) you get to destroy stuff and still be considered the hero; and 4) you get incredible power and status and money in the positions the conspiracy requires you to play.

The new president is first and formost a lawyer on retainer. He is a hit man carefully groomed and positioned to execute the next phase of this war the communists operating from Israel, China and the merchant banking houses of New York, London, the Bahamas, Hong Kong and elsewhere are conducting.

After the election I thought about what the right position to take on Barrack Obama would be. I thought of writing the following:

Well, Mr. Obama is now President and the world is completely changed for conspiracy theorists. We have looked at the man's background, at his positions, at his proposed remedies and we concluded that he is insincere and merely seeking to continue what Bush-Clinton-Bush as a tag team had begun. We have been warning that this candidate, who was deliberately given the three most beatable candidates in the world run against (Hillary Clinton, 'Manchurian' John McCain and Mrs. Palin) by the communist (Zionist) conspiracy Money Power which controls both parties and the third parties as well (Barr, Nader, McKinney and Paul) -- but that was all educated guesses, best analysis with the information available, and certainly made without a true view of the Barrak Obama's heart and mind. He kow-towed to AIPAC, but perhaps that was only to get himself elected. Perhaps after getting into the White House he reveal to us that he was really on our side all along and merely tricked Goldman Sachs and Israel into thinking that he was their man. How else could a good man ever get a chance of taking power from the Money Power but by fooling them. After all, if conspiracy theorists immediately begin with accusation and opposition the new president will have no support from which to oppose the Money Power if he ever chose to do so. We would not be giving him a chance to do the right thing. After all, he can't serve both the Money Power and the general welfare. He has to betray one or the other. But why could he not betray the Money Power when he assumed office. We must, so I was saying to myself, at least give him the chance to chose the right once power is handed to him. It would be unfair and unreasonable not to give him that chance.

But then I saw that he was choosing between Lawrence Summers and Timothy Geithner for Treasury Secretary. I saw that he picked and Mossad infiltrator Rahm Emanuel tobecome his Chief of Staff and Clinton's former Chief of Staff to reassemble the Red-Chinese-and-Israel-controlled Clinton White House. Obviously there was no need pretending that I didn't know what I already knew. The Obama Administration is already in place. The big deeds are already completely planned. The necessary stimuli are already programmed to occur on the dates needed to motivate whatever emergency measures are to be foisted on us.

The conspiracy theorist is of course completely derailed by the Obama Victory. Ten years ago everything I said was discounted when I was labeled "just a Clinton hater." And when 9-11 was exposed for what it really was, those letting the people know were instantly branded "anti-Semites." Now it's going to be "Dick Eastman hates blacks." Oh, yes, of course it will work. It always works.

I never watch television -- except on election night. (Did you hear the anchor of ABC news that night off-handedly remark that he was having a private discussion with the governor of Arizona about McCain when the governor said "John is running for second place." No one commented on that. But of course it was true. McCain was tagged to run because it was impossible that he could win. Palin was chosen for the same reason. And Lieberman came over because it was known that polling analysis showed by how much Lieberman brought down the votes for John Kerry in 2004. Lieberman came over specifically to elect Barrak Obama. Do you think he is stupid? Do you also imagine that the Clinton's don't know that no one except a few lesbian billionaires and the left over dregs of Clinton patronage and the communist party and the random hairdresser would vote for Hillary Clinton? The voters were scared off Obama Cliff by stock boogie-men shouting "Boo!" from each of the other three directions.

And so George Bush -- the man the public was finally coming to see for what he really was -- is replaced by a new man -- a black man -- the first black man in the white house (the first step-and-fetch-it black lawyer with a winning smile and a standardized Dershowitz Harvard Lawyer's brain on retainer to the Money Power doing its political bidding. People are so easily sold by such a combination. The blacks have been loyal demcrats so long -- the Money Power knew that to get another George Bush or Bill Clinton in office he would have to be black and counterfeit populist. And so we have a man with a spotless reputation -- who is coming in as "the People's Answer to George W. Bush" and White Man war, and White Man greed -- while in fact all the same communist Jews are running the same slaughterhouse.

So who is going to tell the Black Americans and Democrats that their new Messiah is "Goldman Sachs" using Obama's black skin to continue the same pillage and degredation of this country that they have been conducting all along? Remember, everyone is counting onthis man to save the country. He is their only hope? Is some conspiracy theorist going to tell them that their one hope is a fraud? Jump to where? Obama is all that they have. It was impossible to remove George W. Bush with all of the proof of the 9-11 false-flag attack etc. How can a case possibly be made against Obama -- when he is now of the same party of "Chinatown Pelosi". I see the new President as specially chosen and trained to administer horrific fatal blows to the people of the United States -- blows for Communism, and Zionism, and the hatred of the global elites for the kind of freedom and dignity and political power for the common man that this country has represented and, in its ideals, stood for.

All of the words of all of the conspiracy theorists in the world have accomplished exactly nothing against the Money Power. With that power now operating behind the face of Mr. Obama our task of convincing the world of the truth and of laying out an alternative course of action is certainly not going to be easier. Yet what Epictetus wrote remains true: "Difficulties are things that show what men are." I know that Jeff Rense and Michael Chussodovsky and Mike Rivero and the rest will continue the fight as long as strength remains, exposing the trap that has been so successfully set for us all.

The ingorant world is feeling relief that George Bush has been replaced -- not realizing and refusing to consider that a new and much more competent team has now stepped in to execute the next phase of the same conspiracy against the common man that the Money Power has pursued in every President's administration, with only a handful of exceptions (Johnson, Cleveland, Taft, Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Kennedy, and sometimes Truman, FDR, and Nixon and Carter as far as I can tell, since the Civil War).

I notice there is a new Senator in New England -- a Jew from Goldman Sachs -- but, I heard him say on National Public Radio, that between Goldman Sachs and winning the Senate Seat he had done some work in a project to provide poor housing. Of course. This is how Democrats qualifiy themselves for office. A little token work for the poor. Our new president did the same thing to "qualify" himself as a man of the people. And he does it well. He sounds good. Sometimes even I respond to the smile -- even though the thin lips tell me that this is a man who can be cold and merciless -- just as the eyes of Rahm Emanuel reveal to me a cold-blooded killer. (I actually like the things that the President's black pastor has to say and that his wife has said -- in fact I agree with them. It is not for the Obama that the nation voted for that I oppose -- it is Obama's actions that have revealed the objectives and orientation of a Goldman-Sachs league criminal walking us down a very dark ally.

Mr. Obama is not going to listen to ideas about Social Credit. He knows what he is going to do. He knows that only the promises made to certain people are going to be kept -- and none of those are the promises discussed in the campaign. But he was honest enough to share that there is going to be suffering -- even though there suffering is unnecessary if the right nationalist economic measures were taken.

Obama has surrounded himself with people who will build a wall around him, a wall that will let him -- Cheney-like -- do what he must do for world communism and the destruction of everything this conspiracy theorist holds dear.

It doesn't matter what solutions exist to save the American people economically. We are now under the occupation of an hostile foreign power that is controlling information and infiltrating leadership and using that power to destroy us. Do we have the numbers -- in this country and throughtout the world -- to overthrow Zionism and the Chinese dictatorship and the Money Power? Certainly if we could show evidence and explain things to everyone in the world they would line up with us by the billion -- but we have not been able to do that working against all of the communications and disinformation resources of the Money Power.

By the way -- did you notice that Obama did not graciously mention the noble campaign waged against him by black woman Cynthia McKinney. He really owes her a lot. I read her statement in my Washington State voters pamphlet and there was not a world about 9-11 being a false-flag operation or Israel or anything. She did not do as much for Obama as McCain, but still she deserves some credit for absorbing the energy that might have gone to a real opposition candidate. (I supported her at one time, by the way -- until I saw who was behind her campaign.)

I started this message intending just a few pessimistic remarks about Obama before getting on to a discussion of economy remedies. But with this election is gone any sense that anything any of us little folk have to say about the economy matters. Really fixing this economy -- easy as it would be for intelligent people of good will and willing operatives -- is as impossible as building a perpetual motion machine when robbers are in charge of security.

For Discussion #1: Put limits on the amount of wealth people can hold. No wealthy person can have assets in excess of 250,000,000 US dollars (or some number), except if they buy "Excess Weath Certificates" each of which will enable the holder to have $100,000 US dollars worth of wealth above the otherwise legal limit. And where do the rich get these certificates that will enable them to hold wealth in excess of 250 million dollars? The certificates will be randomly distributed to the lower income individuals with their income tax returns. The lower income individuals getting the certificates will then have the right to sell the Excess Wealth Certificates to rich people desiring to retain wealth over the legal limit at whatever price the holder of the certificate and the rich person agree to. Organized markets would obtain. Each year new certificates would be required to escape the Excess Wealth Tax. The point of the notion is that wealth can be redistributed without it being by direct taxation and increased government spending (although I am all for increased government spending on roads and atomic energy and new dams and new waterways (turning Death Valley (350 feet below sea level) into a small Mediterrainian sea perhaps -- generating hydro-electric power as water flows in from the ocean) -- you have no idea what engineers could come up with if goverment provided the capital -- interest free, through social credit rather than borrowing from the Money Power bankers. Obama's promised suffering is not necessary -- he is just a lawyer hired by the international bankers to run the United States for them.

For Discussion #2: Award massive food stamps to all households earning under a certain amount -- including most of the middle class so-called. This would free up normal incomes for increased consumer demand and debt paying ability. At the same time lower the reserve requirement so that local banks can increase their lending at no cost (without having to borrow) -- giving households more purchasing power and local businesses more demand for their products. This is the kind of solution that a president could put in place very quickly to buy us economic time to plan our first attempt at a social credit system. The increased demand would allow farmers to grow more food than otherwise next year -- removing the threat of famine induced by insufficient household purchasing power.

But who am I talking to? The Democrats are now all behind Obama. The Republicans are still pro-Neocon -- I heard Rush Limbaugh saying that now his ideology must recapture the GOP from the Neocons after Bush -- as if he wasn't always their biggest and most faithful mouthpiece.

Yet there are peaceful and kind and wholly innocent Americans who don't derserve any of this. It's for them that conspiracy investigators keep plugging away.

"For truth and duty

it is ever the fitting time;

who waits until circumstances

completely favor his undertaking,

will never accomplish anything."

-- Martin Luther

Avoiding danger

is no safer in the long run

than outright exposure.

The fearful are caught

as often as the bold.

-- Helen Keller

Dick Eastman

Yakima, Washington

Every man is responsible to every other man

========================

The Fed has lent $1.5 trillion to banks, including Citigroup Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., through programs such as its discount window, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility and the Term Securities Lending Facility.

=======================

A mere 12 hours after claiming the Democratic presidential nomination, Barack Obamaappeared before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee yesterday -- and changed himself into an Israel hard-liner.

He promised $30 billion in military assistance for Israel. He declared that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps' Quds Force has "rightly been labeled a terrorist organization." He used terms such as "false prophets of extremism" and "corrupt" while discussing Palestinians. And he promised that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided."

Vowing to stop Tehran from getting a nuclear weapon, the newly minted nominee apparent added: "I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally, Israel. Do not be confused."

How could they be confused? As a pandering performance, it was the full Monty by a candidate who, during the primary, had positioned himself to Hillary Clinton's left on matters such as Iran. Yesterday, Obama, who has generally declined to wear an American-flag lapel pin, wore a joint U.S.-Israeli pin, and even tried a Hebrew phrase on the crowd.

Obama even outdid President Bush in his pro-Israel sentiments. On the very day that Obama vowed to protect Jerusalem as Israel's capital -- drawing a furious denunciation from the Palestinian Authority -- Bush announced that he was suspending a move of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem.

The transformation -- mostly in tone, but occasionally in substance -- might qualify as what Obama likes to call the same old Washington "okey-doke." And the candidate is uncomfortable with such things, as evidenced by his struggle to pronounce the name of the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It came out as "Mahmoud . . . Ahmin -- Ahmeninejad."

The crowd of 7,000 loved him anyway. He received 13 standing ovations, more than twice the number granted the next act, Hillary Clinton. The AIPAC faithful gushed about his performance as they left the Washington Convention Center. "He doesn't even read! He has an extemporaneous delivery," one woman recounted, evidently unaware that Obama had read every word from a teleprompter.

Obama has his work cut out for him with American jews, a crucial Democratic constituency that had largely favored Clinton. On the campaign trail, he routinely scolded Clinton for supporting a hard-line anti-Iran resolution that labeled the Revolutionary Guard terrorists. He also vowed to meet with figures such as Ahmadinejad during his first year in office, without precondition, and he voiced sympathy on the campaign trail for the Palestinian cause.

But the AIPAC crowd was ready to forgive now that Obama has the nomination. They stood to applaud for more than a minute when he entered the cavernous hall to music that could have been for a Superman movie soundtrack. He hugged and kissed his way across the dais.

He got right to the "provocative e-mails" that have been spreading lies about him being a Muslim plant and other such things. "Let me know if you see this guy named Barack Obama, because he sounds pretty scary," the candidate said, reassuring the crowd that he is "a true friend of Israel."

Indeed, he almost sounded as if he were jew. "I had grown up without a sense of roots," he explained. "I understood the Zionist idea, that there is always a homeland at the center of our story."

Somewhere off stage, an AIPAC hand brightened the lights over the audience when it appeared a standing ovation was building -- and Obama presented the audience with many such opportunities.

He invoked the Holocaust ("Never again!"), pledged to "never compromise" Israel's security, and scolded those who propose "abandoning a stalwart ally." He offered more military equipment and missile defense for Israel, vowed to "isolate Hamas," and threatened to "do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Everything in my power. . . . Everything."

The AIPAC crowd grew still when Obama slipped in mentions of his disagreements with their policies. But he was careful to revise and extend his controversial thoughts.

"Contrary to the claims of some, I have no interest in sitting down with our adversaries just for the sake of talking," he said of his talk-with-Ahmadinejad position. "I would be willing to lead tough and principled diplomacy with the appropriate Iranian leaders at a time and place of my choosing, if and only if it can advance the interests of the United States."

His criticism of the Iraq war also produced relative quiet in the room, as did his call for a "contiguous and cohesive" Palestinian state, and for Israel to "refrain from building new settlements, as it agreed to do."

But Obama's hard line found support from an unexpected source -- the woman who followed him to the microphone and who still hasn't conceded the nomination. "I know that Senator Obama will be a good friend to Israel," Clinton vouched.

This backing earned Clinton a lights-on standing ovation. But overall, the reception was relatively tepid for Clinton, and understandably so: She was no longer a viable candidate, and the winner of the nomination was sounding like Bibi Netanyahu as he spoke about preserving Israel's "qualitative military advantage" to thwart "any threat from Gaza to Tehran."

Israel's military action last year "was entirely justified," Obama said, to knock out Syria's "weapons of mass destruction" program. "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat," he added.

The Superman music soon returned, and the man with the Star of David on his lapel left the dais in a shower of hugs and kisses from the AIPAC officers.

=============================

oldickeastman@q.com

Four Winds 10 - News