
I KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE AIR FRANCE FLIGHT 447 (Updated 6/7/09)
Dick Eastman
In Portuguese:
http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/cotidiano/ult95u576791.shtml
Translation:
Wreckage from the Atlantic are not the aircraft of Air France, Air Force says
Updated at 19h59.
The FAB (Brazilian Air Force) reported on the evening of Thursday that the wreckage from the Atlantic this Thursday is not the Airbus A-330 of Air France, who disappeared last Sunday (31) with 228 people on board.
According to Brigadier Ramon Borges Cardoso, director of Decea (director of the Department of Control of the airspace), "no material was collected on the aircraft."
"No, no material was collected on the aircraft. What we saw was materials belonging to an aircraft that were left because of the priority of searches for bodies. But so far no piece of the aircraft was recovered," he said.
According to Ramon, the slick of oil was also sighted the aircraft. "A so large quantity found may not have been from the airplane," he said in Recife. According to him, however, the fuel of an airplane is sighted. "The fuel is the more likely it was from the plane. But the oil is discarded."
The brigadier said, however, that the search should continue in the region, and will be reinforced at the end of week with the arrival of new aircraft and boats sent by France.
Today, a piece of 2.5 square meters and two buoys were rescued from waters of the Atlantic, around 13h. According to the Air Force, the object was sighted 550 km away from Fernando de Noronha (PE) by C-130 Hercules aircraft from the FAB. Later, however, the Navy said that the parts do not bring any identification from the Airbus A330 of Air France.
The brigadier denied that the searches have turned to zero. "No. We have made all calculations of the areas. Because taking into account the speed of current, we know exactly where the wreck should be. And this has been confirmed. Because all the planes we launched based on such calculations, in all these local, we sighted wreckage, "he said.
According to him, although the pieces collected today are not the Airbus, the Air Force still maintains the wreckage sighted in the region are the aircraft that the flight was 447.
**************************
Dear Bellringers,
A recent person you published on your site \"Dick Eastman Yakima, Washington\" with the motto \"Every man is responsible to every other man.\" claimed the following:
"9-11 was not the work of \'Islamic Fundamentalists\' who \'hate our freedoms\' and therefore hijacked four jetliners on September 11 and and crashbombed the WTC towers and the Pentagon.\" which is true.
However, Mr. Eastman than goes on to confusingly \"explain\" that \"No one can argue the REAL evidence proving this.\"
What does that mean? Careful of his terminology. He is priming us to deny the official story while embracing the official conspiracy theory: \" (They can and do of course argue, for example on Fox News, with people who have impossible theories about no planes at all hitting the WTC or absurd tales about energy beam weapons in orbit bringing down the twin towers and Building 7 -- but that is part of the pre-planned disinformation obstruction of justice psy-op the perpetrators are using."
So, people who have shown there was absolutely not substantial evidence to prove an airplane \"crashed" at Shanksville, or who have shown that that there is no evidence whatsoever of an airplane\"crashing\" at the Pentagon and that there is still no evidence of any plane crashes at all in Manhattan but a great deal of evidence for explosives and missiles used in each case ... WE are the "disinformation\" campaign?
I cannot speak for energy beam weapons; that is not my expertise.
However, the allegation that \"no planes\" is an impossible theory or is pre-planned disinformation is not consistent with my findings. I have been watching the \"no planes\" movement evolve from its foundation with artist Nico Haupt, the \"first no planer,\" and that truly is a case where his antics are deliberately made an example of, in order to suggest that all people who have come to the conclusion of no planes are crazy. It is obviously deliberate to depict people seeking 9/11 truth as lunatics.
Most no planers have a very low tolerance for \"antics\" and \"disinformation.\"
In fact, we have the best arguments: the footage has been shown to be doctored to add airplanes. That much can be conceded by anyone studying the infamous \"nose out\" problem or the simple fact that the buildings in the 9/11 broadcast are Virtual Reality and the collapses are physically impossible, not \"possible by planted explosives\" or \"nanothermite\" or any other kind of explosive. The physics displayed in the 9/11 video are high grade military simulation PlayStation-style video game physics.
If there were real planes/buildings shown in the so-called \"amateur\" videos (which have so far all been traced back to video animation companies such as Israel\'s Vizrt company as well as other Zionist and Masonic companies):
1) Why did most witnesses describe *nothing* for the \"first plane\" and said the North Tower merely exploded?
2) Why did most of the surprisingly small total witnesses to the first strike of the South Tower describe a \"small plane\" (sometimes even saying with \"no windows\" or \"no markings\") for what hit the South Tower? AGM bunker buster missiles are made to look like airplanes.
3) What is the purpose of faking commercial airliner graphics and covering up the events of the day with *completely fabricated* \"hit\" and \"collapse\" footage as well as hiring fake witnesses, fake injured victims with fake \"close call stories\"? What\'s the purpose of hiring actors to shout loudly to those that saw \"something\" that \"OH YES YOU DEFINITELY SAW A BOEING 767\" (Flying at impossible sea-level speeds as any commercial pilot will explain and merging with the buildings like a knife flying into butter? I don\'t think so.)
If there were \"remote-control\" airliners taken over by \"hijackers\" or \"hackers\" as Mr. Eastman ascribes, what would be the purpose of making sure there is no legitimate video of the true cause of the towers destruction or the pentagon damage?
How did these remote control microchips magically enhance the mass of the aluminum-bodied plane to crash through steel girders and in some cases of official video magically healing the girders once passing through them!?! How did the official videos get confused in such a way that different videos show clearly different flight paths for allegedly the same airplane and this \"airplane\" also flying unlike any real aircraft is capable of flying? This is not later fabrication; this is all the official videos of the news recorded on home VCRs.
Be careful of people like Mr. Eastman who declare \"I know what happened\" and then accuse others of being disinformation.
I do not know about the Directed Energy Weaponry. It is a proven technology, and it surely may have been weaponized, but I don\'t know if it has been *reliably* weaponized. What we do know is that nuclear weapons are at a highly advanced stage. Mister Bush and his pals - soon after entering office - began pushing the defense industry to produce nuclear reduced-radiation Bunker Busters and sell them to foreign countries. Why would he be so eager to push his favorite product \"Bunker Busters\"? Why would companies RockwellCollins and Raytheon be coincidentally contracted just before the time of 9/11 to produce just such a series of weapons? Why did 9/11 apparently serve as a commercial for such weaponry, since the sale of such weapons has sky-rocketed since?
Why would spare and desperate-sounding articles make it known to us in several ways before 9/11 that the future of war may involve \"news hacking\" or the complete digitalization of the media world to convince us of false \"Terror\" attacks by fabricated hijackers, terrorists and evil-doers? Who is surprised that the U.S. agencies who sheltered and hired Nazis into the intelligence community after WWII would now be in charge of our entire government?
Does anybody even know what the sinister MITRE corporation has done to our country since 1958?
Look at the AGM-158 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM
Despite Wikipedia\'s slightly misleading photo, the AGM is more conventionally launched from F-15 or F-16 attackers. What were the alleged military craft doing in the area?
No clumsy Boeing crashes were necessary, nor desired. Hyper-accurate missiles covered up by 100% fake Hollywood-style \"News\" a la the movie \"Wag the Dog\" are far more effective at deceiving people ... as Mr. Dick Eastman has demonstrated to us.
HP
: I KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE AIR FRANCE FLIGHT 447 (Updated 6/6/09)
HP is largely mistaken in his reply to Dick Eastman. This person doesn't seem to have taken the time to research more of Eastman\'s excellent work on the matter.
In fact, droned planes were likely substituted for the remotely-hijacked jetliners during the morning\'s NEADS-NORAD-CANR drills. (One can find audio online of flight controllers scrambling to get a handle on what was happening.) Who had the capability to override several sensitive electronic systems simultaneously is a good question.
Jetliners containing passengers may have been vaporized over the Atlantic Ocean, just as a plane appears to have been vaporized (using preinstalled thermate?) near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Multiple eyewitnesses in NYC told of seeing PLANES (not missiles, not faked video footage flying through the air). Plane parts were found in NYC; in fact, here are photos of an engine at the intersection of Church and Murray Streets:
http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm
http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm
Also, footage from a multitude of angles and multiple different photographers shows basically the same impact details, as the droned plane substituting for "UA175\" strikes the South Tower. In a sense, this droned plane functioned as a \"missile with wings\", as there would not likely have been a pilot or passengers on board. If certain video footage was subsequently altered and released in order to create confusion, that changes nothing about the sequence of original events.
By the way, the Naudet propaganda/snuff film betrays foreknowledge of the WTC attacks:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3962883610962556504