a lawsuit against former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for the torture of prisoners in US custody overseas. The American Civil Liberties Union and Human Rights First had brought the case on behalf of nine former prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan. The suit said Rumsfeld had tacitly or directly authorized a series of abuses including beatings, stabbings, shocks, burnings and sexual humiliation. In his dismissal ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan acknowledged the men had been tortured. But he said they do not have constitutional rights to seek redress and that government officials are immune.

What U.S. District court does this judge reside? It is in the corporate maritime/commercial venue? If so….wrong venue, wrong jurisdiction. The Supreme Court is the only Article III court qualified to hear this case. But it cannot be brought forward by a corporate member, rather by a ‘sovereign’ with proper ‘standing’.

Immunity for Government officials…perhaps. But the question is; “Is Rumsfeld actually a government employee?”

The ‘identity’ of the United States is the ultimate determination of its Constitutional government status. Who or what is the United States?

Observe the founding regulations and definitions establishing the ‘United States’.

Compare the structure of a ‘corporation’ to that of the United States government. You will find the so called ‘government’ operates like a corporation.

Look at the Congress and Presidents cabinet as a board of directors and departmental heads. Take note of the representation of the voters; like shareholders of a corporation.

The true military of the united States of America has been kidnapped by the corporation and used for private gains.

The police departments and highway patrol have been kidnapped by the corporation and used for private gains.

The corporation has established its own Security Guards for its own protections over its assets. In addition to the political capture, it has extended its agenda over the states, counties and cities by use of deception and fraud.

DEFINITIONS are everything. A new approach to your thinking can change the tide of decision and clean off the bloody debris from the shores of this great country. The bloody shores come from the men and women who ‘pretend’ to be something they are not. They have abandoned their posts and the trust of the people for generation after generation. They have aided and abetted the enemy of the people of the sovereign, organic states of America. They are those who claim to be what they are not and serve the interest of that which claims to be what it is not.

===========================================================

TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

PART VI > CHAPTER 176 > SUBCHAPTER A > § 3002

As used in this chapter: (emphasis added)

(1) “Counsel for the United States” means—

(A) a United States attorney, an assistant United States attorney designated to act on behalf of the United States attorney, or an attorney with the United States Department of Justice or with a Federal agency who has litigation authority; and

(B) any private attorney authorized by contract made in accordance with section 3718 of title 31 to conduct litigation for collection of debts on behalf of the United States.

(2) “Court” means any court created by the Congress of the United States, excluding the United States Tax Court.

(3) “Debt” means—

(A) an amount that is owing to the United States on account of a direct loan, or loan insured or guaranteed, by the United States; or

(B) an amount that is owing to the United States on account of a fee, duty, lease, rent, service, sale of real or personal property, overpayment, fine, assessment, penalty, restitution, damages, interest, tax, bail bond forfeiture, reimbursement, recovery of a cost incurred by the United States, or other source of indebtedness to the United States, but that is not owing under the terms of a contract originally entered into by only persons other than the United States;

and includes any amount owing to the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or individual Indian, but excludes any amount to which the United States is entitled under section 3011 (a).

(4) “Debtor” means a person who is liable for a debt or against whom there is a claim for a debt.

(5) “Disposable earnings” means that part of earnings remaining after all deductions required by law have been withheld.

(6) “Earnings” means compensation paid or payable for personal services, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement program.

(7) “Garnishee” means a person (other than the debtor) who has, or is reasonably thought to have, possession, custody, or control of any property in which the debtor has a substantial nonexempt interest, including any obligation due the debtor or to become due the debtor, and against whom a garnishment under section 3104 or 3205 is issued by a court.

(8) “Judgment” means a judgment, order, or decree entered in favor of the United States in a court and arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt.

(9) “Nonexempt disposable earnings” means 25 percent of disposable earnings, subject to section 303 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act.

(10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe.

(11) “Prejudgment remedy” means the remedy of attachment, receivership, garnishment, or sequestration authorized by this chapter to be granted before judgment on the merits of a claim for a debt.

(12) “Property” includes any present or future interest, whether legal or equitable, in real, personal (including choses in action), or mixed property, tangible or intangible, vested or contingent, wherever located and however held (including community property and property held in trust (including spendthrift and pension trusts)), but excludes—

(A) property held in trust by the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or individual Indian; and

(B) Indian lands subject to restrictions against alienation imposed by the United States.

(13) “Security agreement” means an agreement that creates or provides for a lien.

(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

(16) “United States marshal” means a United States marshal, a deputy marshal, or an official of the United States Marshals Service designated under section 564.

NOW: Go back and replace ‘United States’ with the correct definition or language of “Federal corporation”. Like this:

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the Federal corporation; or

(C) an instrumentality of the Federal corporation.

(16) “Federal corporation marshal” means a Federal corporation marshal, a deputy marshal, or an official of the Federal corporation of the Federal corporation Marsha/ Service designated under section 564.

SO WHO DOES RUMSFELD WORK FOR AND WHAT IMMUNITY DOES HE HAVE?

============================================================================

F.Y.I.

The United States Defined

Few Americans realize that there are three definitions for the “United States.” Most have been misled to believe that the term “United States” has a single meaning and is a generic term referring to the country as a whole. The Second definition states “United States” (D.C.) has its own citizens (see United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens. The yellow fringed flag signifying this jurisdiction as not for decorative purposes. It signifies the jurisdiction of the District, also known as CORPORATE U.S. FEDERAL that has been extended into the Union states by the 14th Amendment.

The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington D.C.,” in accordance with the 14th Amendment which the record indicates was never ratified (see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly, 484; Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of U.S. Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

The only Judicial Courts in America are those according to Article 3 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is such an assignment and a Judicial Article III Court sets in Hawaii, but without assigned judges, so it is an empty house. All other district courts are a creation of the congress and serve the commercial interest of the ‘corporation’ under administrative authority. It has severely limited jurisdiction but operates under a cloak of deception via contract in which the unknowing participant enters.

(Note: FYI text taken from a previous post, author unknown)

With Respect and Honor to our country, the united States of America,

An American Grandma,

Illenna Kay