in his pajamas to see what was happening. Both faced felony charges, for "eluding" police and "assisting someone to elude". Both boys were already bonded at Treasury, so complaints were immediately sent to Treasury for set-off.

Youngest son signed all papers "By....Authorized Representative", other son signed his regular signature. At court appearance for arraignment, older son was called first...when he answered that he was there "For that matter as the authorized representative" all hell broke loose in front of a packed courtroom, judge called him "looney". Then when judge handed him papers to sign for the matter to proceed to Superior Court, he signed "By...Authorize Representative". After this he was almost jumped by the two police bailiffs and then coerced into signing another form "the regular way", under the premise that he had previously been given the wrong form!

Immediately thereafter, the judge jumped out of his seat and said that he needed to go into chambers instead of calling the case. While he was in chambers we were told by bailiffs to leave. After asking about why youngest son had not been called, we were just told that the judge had said that we should leave.

Matter with youngest son has NOT proceeded out of Municipal Court, it is at a standstill, with the exception of a ticket that was issued AFTER the court appearance, for the headlight and a notice that he had failed to appear! With it, was a handwritten remark, stating that the judge wanted him to plea for the ticket by mail (sounds like he didn't want him back in his court). Everything was AFV'd, set-off at Treasury and this court was noticed with a letter rogatory similar to the last sample you shared from your library, without a promissory note but with a copy of the indemnity bond (basically bonding the whole township, all the complaints and the statutes) and an affidavit of negative averment. Judge issued a verdict of guilty, for $135 so that now this judgment can be AFV'd and set-off.

With older son needing to appear in Superior Court, full BIC process was used, with a BIC Bonded Promissory Note of 1 million, Indemnity Bond, Declaration of Political Status and surrender of the Birth Certificate, all by notary presentment. He was due to appear in court on April 5, but since full administrative process had already been served, we didn't feel it would be wise for him to appear in court, and possibly be harassed, coerced, or tricked into testifying...so we allowed the paper to take his place. We anticipated that the worst case scenario would be a bench warrant, and were prepared to deal with it.

Yesterday first notary dishonor was served to Superior Court, with a 3 day offer of immunity and rest of process. Today we received notice in the mail for this son from the local Municipal Court, saying that the matter is re-scheduled to be heard in Municipal Court on April 30th!

We have never heard of this before...a higher court sending a matter BACK to the lower court! It seems Superior Court is afraid of the liability and has thrown it back to the lower court that originated it Of course now Municipal Court will be served with full administrative process (they have already had the pleasure of seeing a copy of youngest son indemnity bond, so they might already imagine what this son is going to be serving them with). Your thoughts on this new development would be appreciated.

Since these matters came to light, police cars do not come down our block anymore (they were always present before), and none of us have been harassed. I think they are starting to know who we are around here, or maybe, it's because WE are starting to know who we are. So much so, that two weeks ago, I had the pleasure of being stopped by the local police, not once, but twice within one hour while going to the notary to complete the BIC process! In both instances the police didn't ask for my name, didn't try to contract, and when I asked "May I ask you to let us go?" They handed me back my documents without saying a word. I said thank you, and left. The "infractions" were tinted windows, expired inspection, no insurance etc. the tickets would have amounted to several hundred dollars. We have never had this happen before!

With much appreciation for all your work,

P......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sam K. WROTE:

My Friends,

If you're embroiled in a case where everything seems foreboding, please read the following email from two courageous parents who were attendees at the Rockland Mass. seminar last November. Since all "law" is commercial and all cases begin in admiralty, sometimes something as simple as a restricted signature is all that's needed to bring Goliath to his knees. And when that happens, it's a marvelous thing to behold. Suddenly the sense of gloom is replaced by amazement at the sight of everyone ELSE running for the hills.

These folks gave a crash course in commercial process to their sons, updated their process with the Beneficiaries-in-Common (BIC) payment methods, and never looked back including willingness to fearlessly provoke a bench warrant knowing they had the commercial remedies for this strictly commercial event.

I plan to analyze these events and other victory results this evening (Friday night) at 8 PM EST on "Take No Prisoners" at www.truthradio.com. We will explore the commercial remedies that reduced the standard array of felonies to the typical sea of squirming court officers searching for the emergency exit. Please tune in as there is much to be enjoyed. If you are

a serious student of commerce, I suggest you review the email line-by-line regarding process.

If you could benefit from learning the BIC process comprehensively and immediately, please contact Roberta at RobertaT@hush.com.

for more information. We will be juggling capacity right up until the starting date next Thursday.

And if you have no objection, would you kindly forward this email to the folks on your list if you think they would find it of interest?

God Bless,

Sam Kennedy