FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

Flashback: McConnell And DeMint Praised Harriet Miers’ ‘Wealth’ Of ‘Great Experience’

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

Soon after President Obama announced that he had nominated Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell (KY) and Jim DeMint (SC) attacked his choice because Kagan has never served as a judge:

MCCONNELL: “She’s the least qualified in terms of judicial experience in 38 years. Now some would argue that maybe we need to have people who don’t have judicial experience. I saw a survey indicating that about 70 percent of the American people think that judicial experience is a good idea for somebody who is going to be on the Supreme Court.”

DEMINT: “I’m concerned that she has no judicial experience to give Americans confidence that she will be impartial in her decisions.”

Yet back in 2005, both DeMint and McConnell praised Harriet Miers’ nomination to the Supreme Court before she withdrew. Like Kagan, Miers had no previous judicial experience, yet both GOP senators expressed admiration for Miers, specifically citing her “experience”:

MCCONNELL: “Ms. Miers has an exemplary record of service to our country. She will bring to the Court a lifetime of experience in various levels of government, and at the highest levels of the legal profession. She is a woman of tremendous ability and very sound judgment. … Ms. Miers has great experience in government as well, at the local, state, and federal levels. …She is well qualified to join the nation’s highest court. … She will make a fine addition to the Supreme Court, and I look forward to her confirmation.”

DEMINT: “Ms. Miers would bring a wealth of personal experience to the Supreme Court. I expect she will show that she has the intelligence, fairness, and open-mindedness needed to serve on the Court.”

Some of McConnell’s and DeMint’s GOP colleagues recognize the importance of having other professional experiences beyond serving as a judge. “It can be very valuable to have an individual who has a background other than that of being a judge,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said of Kagan, adding, “So I do not see that as being a problem at all.” Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) expressed similar sentiments. “I think that having some judges without judicial experience is not bad thing,” he said yesterday. And today on ABC’s Top Line, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said, “Some said, ‘Well she’s not a sitting judge.’ Well I don’t think that’s a disqualification. Some of the greatest justices in history never sat in a court room.”

Indeed, out of the 111 justices who have served on the Supreme Court, 41 had no prior judicial experience before Senate confirmation — including former Chief Justices Earl Warren and conservative William Rehnquist. And as the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein noted, Rehnquist “would be considered something of a novice by the standards some are applying to Kagan.”