New lawsuit names Hawaii Dept of Health in genocide-Horowitz
LEONARD GEORGE HOROWITZ
Plaintiff
vs.
CHIYOME L.. FUKINO, DIRECTOR
OF HEALTH, and SARAH Y.
PARK, CHIEF OF DISEASE
OUTBREAK CONTROL DIVISION,
STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH
Defendants
)
)
)
AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARD
GEORGE HOROWITZ ALLEGING
FRAUD, NEGLIGENT
HOMICIDE, DECEPTIVE
PRACTICES IN THE
COMMERCIAL OPERATION AND
MONOPOLIZATION OF DRUG
TRADING, AND COMPLICITY
IN THE CONDUCT OF
GENOCIDE
AFFIDAVIT OF LEONARD G. HOROWITZ
1. This Affidavit is based on my personal knowledge, except
where otherwise stated, and, if called upon to do so, I could and
would competently testify to the matters herein stated.
2. I am a Harvard University trained certified expert in the
fields of behavioral science, health education/health promotion,
media persuasion, medical sociology, public health, and emerging
diseases. I have additional expertise in natural healing methods
and materials, involving genetics and electrogenetics; and in
virology, and vaccine research and developments by reason of my
academic trainings, scientific publications, and internationally
recognized authority and celebrity in these fields.
3. I openly disclose my bias as a leading author,
personal care educator, consumer protector, alternative and
complementary health care specialist, and formulator of
natural remedies for public protection and remediation of
diseases; and I hold trademarks covering several products
that compete with the drug industry’s monopolization of
medicine and infectious disease prevention and remediation
in America.
4. I further disclose that I am a Levite priest by virtue
of my bloodline, spiritual direction, and ecclesiastical
commitments. I am the body corporate and Overseer of The
Royal Bloodline of David, an omni-denominational healing
ministry established in the State of Washington and
certified by the Secretary of State therein in 2000; and
was the pro se counsel in Horowitz vs. The State of Hawaii,
Department of Health, et al. (Civ. No. 06-1-0296).
5. Compelled by God and my responsibilities in these
positions, I have sought on several occasions, by whatever
lawful means, to protect the U.S. Constitutional right of
every American to exempt from risky vaccinations for
religious, philosophical, and medical reasons; and protect
Americans’ bodies as absolute personal properties for which
compensation must be paid if and when taken, according to
the 5th Amendment of the Constitution.
6. Vaccination policies for “public health” and
“immunization,” the later legally defined as a
“administrative process” not immune response, for
developing “herd immunity” in a population, are based on
psychosocial conditioning far more than science proving
vaccines’ “safety and efficacy.”
7. This little know, arguably unconscionable, fact was
established in Com. v. Pear, Com. v. Jacobson, 67 L.R.A.
935, 183 Mass. 242, 66 N.E. 719 (Mass. 1903) wherein the
Supreme Court ruled that it “would have been obliged to
consider the evidence in connection with facts of common
knowledge which the court will always regard . . .
[Emphasis added.] [I]f a statute purports to be enacted to
promote the general welfare of the people, and is not at
variance with any provision of the Constitution, the
question whether it will be for the good of the community
is a legislative, and not a judicial question....”
8. This Court ruled, “But if a statute invades personal
rights to liberty or property, and is not directed to the
promotion of the general welfare, but is an evasion of the
principles on which legislative action should be founded,
and by which it should be regulated, and is thus an abuse
of legislative power, it should be declared
unconstitutional.”
9. In this instant, chief health officials of the State
of Hawaii placed in writing certain fictitious, false, and
fraudulent claims to influence legislators of the Council
of Hawaii to oppose a Resolution (237-09) “to amend vaccine
laws to include medical, religious, and philosophical
exemptions from any vaccine program, . . .”
10. By issuing to the public, through the press; by way of
press releases and officials’ statements, similar
fictitious, false, and fraudulent claims regarding vaccine
safety testing, efficacy analyses, and rationale for
“immunization” policies, healthy officials have committed
certain actionable crimes damaging the government and
community.
11. Given the Court is “obliged to consider the evidence
in connection with facts of common knowledge” upon which
legislators rely to establish beneficial laws, the
intentional falsification of facts corrupting “common
knowledge,” including use of fraud and fiction to persuade
the press, legislators, and the public at large in matters
of life and death in “public health,” compels this
complaint and official inquiry.
12. The examination and questioning of material “facts”
and “common knowledge” about vaccinations for H1N1 Swine
flu particularly, and “immunizations” in general, shall
expose fraudulent claims made by health officials operating
with intent to deceive and persuade legislators, the media,
and the general public, to advance a criminal conspiracy
resulting in mass murder in the second degree, or genocide.
13. To begin examining the “facts” in this case, including
the “common knowledge” upon which previous Courts have
ruled in favor of vaccination laws and administrative
rules, a review of historical facts is warranted. It is
“common knowledge,” as documented in history books, the
Rockefeller family has held a monopolistic influence over
American medicine and public health since the early 1900s.
This “fact” is material to this affidavit and related
complaint.
14. It is also a historic “fact” that the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR), chaired by David Rockefeller,
influences most powerfully foreign and domestic policies of
the US Federal Government, affecting State governments, and
in this case local public health policies and
administrative procedures, including vaccination policies.
15. For instance, on October 16, 2009 a “CFR Symposium on
Pandemic Influenza: Science, Economics, and Foreign Policy”
was held in New York City to consider a “Report to the
President on U.S. Preparations for 2009-H1N1 Influenza.”
The report was prepared by the President’s Council of
Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). At this
symposium it was discussed that contrived vaccine shortages
might be promoted by the press to counter negative
publicity and public concerns about unproven safety and
efficacy of the new H1N1 vaccines. A week later, led by the
Rupert Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, the media began
heavily promoting H1N1 vaccine shortages when supplies had
been previously predicted to be adequate, and even
superfluous for the need according to US Secretary of
Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius.
16. Although material provable “fact,” it is not “common
knowledge” that David Rockefeller, media mogul Rupert
Murdoch, and America’s leading investment banker, Lloyd
Blankfein, are the three co-chairmen of a little-known
“drug ring” called the Partnership for New York City
(PFNYC); and that these powerful business leaders maintain
gross conflicting interests in the vaccine industry,
genetic biotechnology, and companies advancing patients on
methods and materials used to produce the H1N1 vaccine.
17. The Court must be persuaded, like any reasonable
person, that material “facts” about vaccines, and “common
knowledge” about them, can be factitious and criminally
manipulated for profit without the knowledge of legislators
and health officials who are none-the-less responsible for
advancing beneficial policies in service to the general
community.
18. Further evidencing the Rockefeller family’s powerful
influence over American public health, David Rockefeller’s
brother Jay Rockefeller, currently in the Senate, leads
legislators in advancing national “health care reform”
largely enriching the aforementioned members of the PFNYC.
19. It is “common knowledge” and a “fact” that the United
Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO) directs nations
internationally, including the US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), in response to pandemics,
including the 2009 H1N1 declared “National Emergency.”
20. It is “common knowledge” and a “fact” that the United
Nations was established, along with the WHO, and
international disease surveillance and reporting networks,
with substantial funding by Rockefeller family-related
special interests, agencies, institutions, and
philanthropic organizations.
21. It may not be “common knowledge,” but it is a
certifiable “fact,” that a “top-down” administration policy
now operates directing “emergency pandemic response” and
immunization policies from the WHO affecting local
compliance of health officials in every State to WHO
directives.
22. Thus, a reasonably intelligent public health official
responsible for immunization activities would be expected
to examine potential conflicting interests, and the
allegations of safety and efficacy, claimed to be
scientifically determined, most critically, especially when
“common knowledge” and “facts” have led more than half of
all practicing medical doctors, nurses, and others to
reject appeals to administer new H1N1 vaccines.
23. Having done these kinds of investigations for nearly
two decades, and having thoroughly investigated the
scientific studies upon which false claims that H1N1
vaccines are “safe and effective” are commonly made, I
conclude that this matter of fraud demands the immediate
scrutiny of lawmakers and justice department officials, as
well as the public-at-large; as this urgency threatens the
economy, national security, and the health of potentially
billions of people worldwide.
24. My conclusion, as a reasonably intelligent and
responsible public health professional, investigating the
H1N1 vaccine produced by CSL/Merck, for example, is as
follows. This was submitted to The Lancet for publication:
“Regarding efficacy, and more importantly safety, this
CSL/Merck H1N1 vaccine was assumed to be both,
according to its package insert. 30 The new and old
vaccine had “no controlled clinical studies
demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after
vaccination with” the company’s seasonal flu vaccine,
“AFLURIA.”30 Likewise, vaccine safety was speciously
assumed following 21 assessment days comparing those
who received AFLURIA (with or without mercury
preservative, confounding everyone’s analysis) with
those who received some undisclosed “European-licensed
trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine as an active
control” [Emphasis added.] This “active control” was
preserved with mercury.
In plainer language, an unidentified arguably
neurotoxic vaccine served as a “placebo control.”
Since no inactive placebo control such as saline was
used, the study design was obviously flawed,
confounding, biased, and arguably fraudulent. It may
have precluded observing statistically significant
differences between experimental and control groups
falsely evidencing safety from lacking adverse event
differentials. This intentional obfuscation
exclusively benefited those with conflicting
interests, and/or those inclined to rely on safety
assurances to the detriment of public health and
medical science.
25. Recently, I was asked to review the testimony of
CHIYOME LEINAALA FUKINO and SARAH Y. PARK opposing
legislation titled, “A RESOLUTION URGING HAWAI’I STATE AND
FEDERAL LEGISLATORS TO AMEND VACCINE LAWS TO INCLUDE THE
RIGHT OF MEDICAL, RELIGIOUS, AND PHILOSOPHICAL EXEMPTIONS
FROM MANDATED VACCINATION PROGRAMS.” This important
legislation was prepared following President Barack Obama’s
declaration of H1N1 “National Emergency,” and outcries from
the public concerning health department efforts to promote,
even mandate, H1N1 vaccines for many persons and groups.
26. In reviewing this legal record submitted to influence
local governing officials, I conclude certain statements
made by PARK and FUKINO are fraudulent; violations of Title
18, Part 1, Chapter 47, statutes including §1001—Fraud and
False Statements or entries generally; §1002—Possession of
false papers to defraud United States; §1035—False
statements relating to health care matters; §1038—False
information and hoaxes; and § 1040—Fraud in connection with
major disaster or emergency.
27. I contend the gravity of this fraud involves U.S. Code,
Title 18, Section 1091 that concerns GENOCIDE, wherein it
states: “Whoever, . . . with the specific intent to
destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national . . .
group as such - (1) kills members of that group; (2) causes
serious bodily injury to members of that group; (3) causes
the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members
of the group through drugs, . . . or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are
intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in
whole or in part; (5) imposes measures intended to prevent
births within the group; or (6) transfers by force children
of the group to another group; or attempts to do so, shall
be punished . . . by death or imprisonment for life and a
fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both . . .”
28. “INTENT” is legally defined as: “The determination or
resolve to do a certain thing, or the state of mind with
which something is done.”
29. “DESTROY” is legally defined as: “In general, to ruin
completely; may include a taking. To ruin the structure,
organic existence, or condition of a thing; to demolish; to
injure or mutilate beyond possibility of use; to nullify.
30. Now, PARK and FUKINO, by their written testimony,
intended to obscure certain “facts,” twist and abuse
“common knowledge” to their advantage, nullify serious
concerns and opposition to vaccinations from “unimmunized”
persons such as myself (especially religious objectors),
and worked to marginalized members of our “community” that
has grown to a majority of people who refuse vaccinations
for good reasons.
31. In their arguably psychotic view, rationalized by
pseudoscience published by the biased, Rockefellerinfluenced,
Journal of the American Medical Association,
PARK & FUKINO alleged the existence of two distinct
“communities”--their “community” composed of “immunized”
people, and the “dangerous” community of “unimmunized”
persons.
32. This perversion of “common knowledge” using arbitrary
and objectionable dogma to advance an immunization cult,
satisfies the elements and legal definitions of genocide.
33.. PARK and FUKINO relied on two quasi-scientific reports
published by the American Medical Association, discredited
as an organization over which the Rockefeller family took
control by paying Abraham Flexner to vilify nonpharmaceutical
methods of health care during his bogus
investigation and legislative persuasion campaign in 1910;
The Flexner Report, funded by Rockefeller Foundation’s
counterpart in global education/persuasion arena, the
Carnegie Foundation, fundamentally established the AMA as
the quintessential voice of legitimacy in American health
care.
34. It is “fact” and “common knowledge,” that thereafter,
the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations were instrumental
in advancing the “cult” of vaccination and “modern
medicine” through education/persuasion and pharmaceutical
promotions, along with eugenics (that is, racial hygiene)
in which persons of certain religious or ethnic backgrounds
were viewed as dangerous to others in the “community,” thus
targeted, much like PARK and FUKINO’s targeting of
Philippine immigrants and religious objectors to
vaccinations using pseudo-scientific and/or quasiscientific
rationale and fraudulent persuasion.
35. Since earlier communications and Resolution drafts
brought these matters to their attention, PARK and FUKINO,
Hawaii’s lords and masters over “public health,” cannot
claim ignorance of the “facts” and “common knowledge.”
Thus, they must be criminally investigated and prosecuted
for fraud, as well as genocide.
36. Indisputably, vaccinations are:
a. killing members of our community;
b. causing serious bodily injury to members of our
community;
c. causing the permanent impairment of the mental
faculties of members of our community by mercury and
other pharmaceutical intoxications;
d. subjecting members of our community to conditions of
life that are intended to cause the physical
destruction of religious ideologies and ethnic group
preferences by compelling compliance with
immunization practices;
e. threatening our community with extinction through
petrochemical-pharmaceutical intoxications causing
immune system hyper-stimulation;
f.. imposing intended prevention of births within our
community with the targeting of pregnant women for
vaccinations containing nerve destroying mercury
most dangerous to developing fetuses, and/or when
adjuvants are added containing the sterilizing and
abortive ingredient called nonoxynol-9; and
g. forcing children in our community with orthodox
religious prohibitions toward vaccinations
translocation, or isolation, compelling them to
leave schools, go from one social group to another
to become “home-schoolers,” or even leave the State.
37. This happened to my daughter, Alena N. Horowitz--an
honors student and varsity athlete forced to leave Hilo
High School, and her social network, due to FUKINO’s gross
criminal neglect of requested alternative testing and
examination methods supporting her neofascist genocidal
“mandatory” TB skin testing blood intoxicating program.
38. Evidence against FUKINO and this genocidal policy of
TB skin testing was never heard in Horowitz vs. The State
of Hawaii, Department of Health, et al. (Civ. No. 06-1-
0296). So this program continues to be administered in
violation of the US Constitution and even local vaccination
exemption laws.
39. To my knowledge, tolerance of this institutionalized
genocide based on fraudulent claims made by PARK and
FUKINO, medical cult inductees, also violates U.S. CODE,
TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4, MISPRISION OF
FELONY, and related local statute HRS §710-1013, that
regards “Compounding,” and criminalizes health officials’
silence on material matters for political and wage payoffs.
40. In this context, PARK and FUKINO’s fraudulent written
persuasion administered to the County of Hawaii Council,
evidences their conspiracy of silence, gross criminal
negligence, and downright fraud resulting in second degree
manslaughter, administered under the color of law by
intentional neglect of certain scientific determinations
that run contrary to their medical-pharmaceutical
assumptions. These infractions include:
a. Fraudulent abuse of the terms “immunization,”
“immunized,” and “unimmunized” in their written
report, corrupting the meaning and definition
of this term to advance obfuscation and
persuasion.
b. Suppressing the science proving transmission of
H1N1 viruses from many vaccinated persons to
those not vaccinated. (WHO/BS/07.2074.Expert Committee
on Biological Standardization. Proposed Guidelines: Regulatory
Preparedness for Human Pandemic Influenza Vaccines. WHO
Technical Report Series Geneva-8 to 12 Oct, 2007.)
c. Suppressing the science proving the H1N1
vaccine program is largely experimental.
d. Suppression of science proving increase risks
of new more deadly pandemics may result from
immunization programs delivering genetically
engineered viruses that mutate readily with
other circulating viruses.
e. False and misleading claims the US Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) engages in safety
testing of new vaccines.
f. Conspiracy to cover-up conflicting interests
among many of the most influential FDA and CDC
directors engaged in the vaccine industry, as
well as members of the American Academy of
Pediatrics responsible for childhood
vaccination schedules.
g. Conspiracy to cover-up media relations between
FUKINO’s press officers and agents for the
Honolulu Star that feeds and publishes
Associated Press (AP) propaganda advancing AP
director, Rupert Murdoch’s PFNYC partners’
agenda to advance profitable vaccine special
interests including GlaxoSmithKlein director,
James Murdoch’s favored H1N1 vaccine and
Tamiflu.
h. Suppression of knowledge that FUKINO’s
department purchased FluMist produced by
AstraZeneca/MedImmune whose leading share
holder is Rupert Murdoch’s co-chairman of
PFNYC, Lloyd Blankfein, and as per b. and d.
above, those vaccinated with FluMist “shed”
“live” “active” H1N1 mutagenic viruses for up
to three week risking transmission of
infections and worsening pandemics..
i. Willful deception in asserting, “Since 2001, no
new vaccine licensed by the FDA for use in
children has contained thimerosal . . . except
for multi-dose formulations of influenza
vaccines,” that they do not reveal can contain
up to 50 times the concentration of mercury of
single dose vials! INCREDIBLY, THE USE OF
MULTI-DOSE VIALS IS WHAT PARK & FUKINO
EXCLUSIVELY REPORTED WAS REQUIRED FOR HAWAII’s
“HERD IMMUNITY.”
41. In seeking legislative opposition to Resolution 237-
09, PARK and FUKINO submitted in writing several
fraudulent, knowingly false and misleading, claims to State
and County officials in direct violation of HRS 661-
21a(1)(2)(c)(d) and 46-171, respectively. Some of these
were described in my rebuttal letter to legislators. (See:
EXHIBIT C.)
42. For instance, the statement “School immunization
requirements serve to ensure that thresholds for
maintaining community-wide protection . . .” is patently
fraudulent as: no thresholds whatsoever have been
established, not in science or elsewhere. None have been
published. In fact, there is not even a definition of
“threshold” in the Administrative Rules of the Department
of Health.
43. Thus, to claim a “threshold” exists, or imply that it
has been reliably established, and is the foundational
criteria upon which “school immunization requirements serve
to ensure . . . protection” is a gross criminal fraud as
people are being fooled, injured and killed as a result.
44. The use of this word, in this official record, and
urgent context in which it was delivered, demonstrates
outrageous criminal malfeasance and use of fictitious
assertions (i.e., non-existent science), jargon, and
psychobabble, to justify officials’ overstepped authority
to sustain negligent homicide and genocide.
45. The word “psychobabble” is justifiable in this context
of administering a health science fraud. Psychobabble is
defined as “a form of prose using jargon, buzzwords and
highly esoteric language to give an impression of
plausibility through mystification, misdirection, and
obfuscation. Therefore, PARK and FUKINO used psychobabble
and pseudoscientific language to persuade impressionable
readers, County and State legislators, into rejecting the
subject Resolution. They routinely do this, likewise
abusing and persuading the media and general public into
thinking officials are reliable and speak with legitimate
science-based authority.
46. The use of this word, threshold, and many other mind
manipulating abuses of language that I shall evidence
further in Court, demonstrates criminal action as per HRS
661-21a(1)(2)(c)(d) and HRS 46-171, in which abuses refer
to persons or a person who: “Has actual knowledge of the
information; (2) Acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth
or falsity of the information; or (3) Acts in reckless
disregard of the truth or falsity of the information; and
no proof of specific intent to defraud is required.”
47. I could go on for pages providing far more evidencebased
indictments of PARK-FUKINO fraudulent testimony
provided in EXHIBIT B, (far beyond that provided in EXHIBIT
C); and I am expecting to do so following service of this
AFFIDAVIT to the attorneys representing the County of
Hawaii, and State of Hawaii.
48. I expect to receive, according to statutes compelling
official action, a required SUMMONS to provide expert
testimony in support of criminal charges against PARK and
FUKINO, anticipating the issuance of criminal indictments
against these mass murderers, as per HRS §661-22 Civil
actions for false claims and other State and Federal code
violations.
49. Herein local rules state:
The attorney general shall investigate any violation
under section 661-21.
If the attorney general finds that a person has violated
or is violating section 661-21, the attorney general may
bring a civil action under this section.
§661-23 Evidentiary determination; burden of proof.
A determination that a person has violated the
provisions of this chapter shall be based on a
preponderance of the evidence.
50. Compelling State of Hawaii Attorneys General to respond
to the certifiable charges advanced in this affidavit is
local statute HRS §710-1013, that again regards
“Compounding.” It states:
“Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of
a felony cognizable by a court of the United States,
conceals and does not as soon as possible make known
the same to some Judge or other person in civil or
military authority under the United States, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
three years, or both,” and
“A person commits the offense of compounding if the
person intentionally accepts or agrees to accept any
pecuniary benefit as consideration for:(a)
Refraining from seeking prosecution of an offense; or
(b) Refraining from reporting to law-enforcement
authorities the commission or suspected commission of
any offense or information relating to the offense.
51. PARK and FUKINO have also criminally neglected other
highly effective, less expensive, lower risk, natural
options and products, other than vaccines, available to
prevent infectious diseases. This additionally demonstrates
negligence and possibly criminal actions in violation of
Federal RICO statutes: Antitrust Section 1 of the Sherman
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, that provides criminal sanctions
against any person "who shall make any contract or engage
in any conspiracy" in restraint of commerce.
52. As the co-developer of a silver hydrosol product
(i.e., OxySilver) I can present substantial evidence of
RICO statute violations and criminal actions in restraint
of commerce and alternative health education information
damaging every citizen of Hawaii and America; exclusively
benefiting members of the pharmaceutical-medical community.
53. In this instance, a civil plaintiff . . .
“must establish that: (1) two or more entities formed
a combination or conspiracy; (2) the combination or
conspiracy produces, or potentially produces, an
unreasonable restraint of trade or commerce; and (3)
the restrained trade or commerce is interstate in
nature. In a criminal antitrust prosecution, the
government must also prove that the defendants
intended to restrain commerce and acted with knowledge
of the probable consequences of their actions.
54. It should be noted that Federal statute, 18 U.S.C. §
203, criminalizes the use of a public office for private
gain, whether it be by the office holder/employee or by an
outside individual attempting to influence the governmental
official. The "matters" covered include a "contract,
claim, controversy . . . [or] charge.”
55. Regarding health care fraud, The Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, P.L. 104-191,
created five new health care fraud crimes. These new crimes
mirror existing white-collar offenses such as mail and wire
fraud, false statements, obstruction of justice, and
provide for jail terms of up to 10 years.
56. 18 U.S.C. §1347 states:
"Whoever knowingly and willfully executes, or attempts
to execute, a scheme or artifice (1) to defraud any
health care benefit program; or (2) to obtain, by means
of false or fraudulent pretenses .. . . any of the money
of . . . any health care benefit program" shall be
sentenced up to 10 years in prison and fined up to
$250,000.
57.. 18 U.S.C. §1518 states:
“Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care
offenses is punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a
fine of as much as $250,000.”
58. 18 U.S.C. §1956 criminalizes "laundering" of funds
derived from the proceeds from health care offenses,
allowing for prison sentences of up to 20 years and fines
up to $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved.
59. 18 U.S.C. § 2332a criminalizes “USE OF WEAPONS OF MASS
DESTRUCTION,” and although this statute regards terrorism,
effectively identical to the grossly criminal affect of
H1N1 “bioterrorism” causing psychological stress, anxiety,
depression, and behavioral disorders in the general
population; “public health” officials, and their complicit
media, appear to be exempted from responsibility for
related morbidity and mortality, as these persons with
“lawful authority” disseminate propaganda, along with
biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction. Their
“biochemical weapons” causing mass population reduction
over the long term now include H1N1 recombinant “live”
“active” viruses combined with toxic immune destructive
chemical additives in FluMist, and other FDA licensed,
officially recommended, vaccines lacking placebo-controlled
long-term studies for safety and efficacy.
60. As evidence will prove to a jury of reasonable people in
Court, PARK and FUKINO are operating the 2009-10 H1N1 Swine
Flu vaccine program under false pretenses as stated above
and additionally evidenced in EXHIBIT C. Far more findingsof-
fact shall be entered into the record at the time of
trial.
61. In summary, suppression of science, obfuscation of
“facts,” persuasion using illicit media influence,
manipulation of “common knowledge” including the alteration
of established definitions and terms to advance
misinformation, criminal neglect of vaccination risks,
abolition of myriad side effects, willful deception
regarding vaccine ingredients and their risks, aversion to
legitimate “adverse event” data collection; opposition to
liability admissions regarding vaccine-induced morbidity
and mortality, fraudulently claimed safety and efficacy of
vaccinations and pharmaceutical concoctions such as
Tamiflu, and condemnation of natural, low cost, highly
effective, zero risk alternatives to vaccinations for
prevention and remediation of infectious diseases, reflects
these officials’ cult mentality, social malignancy, and
criminal complicity in advancing genocide under the guise
of public health in breach of legislators’ trust and
intention to serve healthcare providers and consumers
faithfully and beneficially.
61. As an expert in the field of public health and vaccine
science, investigating government sponsored health frauds
for two decades, I conclude PARK and FUKINO have far
overstepped their authority and perpetrated a murderous
fraud under the guise of H1N1 immunization—effectively a
genocidal operation indictable under 18 U.S.C. § 2332a and
other statutes cited.
62. I declare under penalty of law that the foregoing is
true and accurate.
DATED: November 17, 2009
_______________________
Leonard George Horowitz
State of California
County of Orange
Subscribed and sworn to before me, this _________________
[day of month] day of _________________ [month],
20____.
[Notary Seal:]
__________________________________
[signature of Notary]
__________________________________
[typed name of Notary]
NOTARY PUBLIC