Full-page USA Today Ad to Challenge Birth Certificate Authenticity
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 8:44 AM
Thank you very much!
See also:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/supreme.court/mandamus.1.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/mandamus.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/intervention.prohibition.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/notice.of.intent.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/before.and.after.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/votingaz.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm
p.s. In point of fact, I continue to be very disappointed that
Mr. Schulz persistently fails to request documentary proof
that Judicial "Robes" -- like R. Barclay Surrick -- have all 4 credentials
required of them by the Constitution and pertinent federal statutes:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/foia.request.usdc.dpa.htm (PAST DUE)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/letter.2008-08-05/letter.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/surrick/nad.affidavit.htm (PAST DUE)
Instead, he continues to refer to them as "judges" when
such a bad habit now assumes facts not in evidence!
The Oath of Office Clause is also an essential provision in the
Constitution for the United States of America:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3
... as are all Federal Statutes which implement that Clause:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/federal.judges.htm
... pursuant to the Supremacy Clause at 6:2:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:2
WHAT SAY YOU, MR. SCHULZ?
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 8:18 AM, <JoanSharon@aol.com> wrote:
Draft of WTP full-page ad
to be published in
USA TODAY the week of November 10, 2008:
CLICK
HERE to make your secure donation to the WTP
Foundation.
Click here
to see how much money we have raised so far.
An Open Letter to Barack Obama:
Are you a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S.?
Are you
legally qualified to hold the Office of President?
Dear Mr. Obama:
On October 24, 2008, a
federal judge granted your request to dismiss a lawsuit by Citizen
Philip Berg, who challenged your qualifications under the "Natural
Born Citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution to legally hold the
office of President of the United States of America.
Mr. Berg presented factual
evidence to the Court in support of his claim that you are either
a citizen of your father's native Kenya by birth, or that you became
a citizen of Indonesia, relinquishing your prior citizenship
when you moved there with your mother in 1967.
In your response to the
lawsuit, you neither denied Mr. Berg's claims nor
submitted any evidence which would refute his assertions. Instead,
you argued that the Court lacked the jurisdiction to determine the
question of your legal eligibility because Mr. Berg lacked
"standing."
Astonishingly, the judge
agreed, simply saying, "[Mr. Berg] would have us derail the
democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of
people voted and underwent excessive vetting during what was one of
the most hotly contested presidential primary [sic] in living
memory."
Unfortunately, your response
to the legal claim was clearly evasive and strikingly out of
character, suggesting you may, in fact, lack a critical
Constitutional qualification necessary to assume the Office of
President: i.e., that you are not a "natural born" citizen of
the United States or one who has relinquished his American
citizenship.
Before you can exercise any
of the powers of the United States, you must prove that you have
fully satisfied each and every eligibility requirement that the
Constitution mandates for any individual's exercise of those powers.
Regardless of the tactics
chosen in defending yourself against the Berg lawsuit, significant
questions regarding your legal capacity to hold this nation's
highest office have been put forth publicly, and you have failed
to directly refute them with documentary evidence that is routinely
available to any bona fide, natural born U.S.
Citizen.
As one who has ventured into the fray of public
service of his own volition, seeking to possess the vast powers of
the Office of President, it is not unreasonable to demand that you
produce evidence of your citizenship to answer the questions and
allay the concerns of the People. Indeed, as the one seeking the
office, you are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer
such evidence to establish your qualifications as explicitly
mandated by Article II of the Constitution.
Should you proceed to assume
the office of the President of the United States as anything but a
bona fide natural born citizen of the United States that has
not relinquished that citizenship, you would be inviting a national
disaster, placing our Republic at great risk from untold
consequences. For example:
·
Neither the Electoral College
on December 15, nor the House of Representatives on January 6 would
be able to elect you, except as a poseur - a usurper;
·
As
a usurper, you would be unable to take the required "Oath or
Affirmation" of office on January 20 without committing the crime
of perjury or false swearing, for being ineligible for the
Office of the President you cannot faithfully execute the Office of
the President of the United States;
·
Your every act in the
usurped Office of the President would be a criminal
offense as an act under color of law that would subject the
People to the deprivation of their constitutional rights, and
entitling you to no obedience whatsoever from the People;
·
as
a usurper acting in the guise of the President you could not
function as the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy and of the
militia of the several states, as such forces would be under no
legal obligation to remain obedient to you;
·
No
one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch would be required
to obey any of your proclamations, executive orders or directives,
as such orders would be legally VOID;
·
Your appointment of
Ambassadors and Judges to the Supreme Court would be VOID
ab initio (i.e., from the beginning), no matter what
subsequent actions the Senate might take as well as rendering any
such acts by such appointed officials void as well;
·
Congress would not be able to
pass any new laws because they would not be able to acquire the
signature of a bona fide President, rendering all such
legislation legally VOID;
·
As
a usurper, Congress would be unable to remove you from
the Office of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain
political chaos including a potential for armed conflicts within the
General Government or among the States and the People to effect the
removal of such a usurper.
As an attorney and sitting
U.S. Senator, I'm sure you agree that our Constitution is the
cornerstone of our system of governance. It is the very
foundation of our system of Law and Order – indeed, it is the
supreme law of the land. I'm sure you also agree that its
precise language was no accident and cannot be ignored if
Individual, unalienable, natural Rights, Freedoms and Liberties are
to be protected and preserved.
As our next potential
President, you have a high-order obligation to the Constitution (and
to those who have fought and died for our Freedom) that extends far
beyond that of securing a majority of the votes of the Electoral
College. No matter your promises of change and prosperity,
your heartfelt intent or the widespread support you have garnered in
seeking the highest Office of the Land, the integrity of the
Republic and Rule of Law cannot, -- must not -- be put
at risk, by allowing a constitutionally unqualified
person to sit, as a usurper, in the Office of the
President.
No matter the level of
practical difficulty, embarrassment or disruption of the nation's
business, we must -- above all -- honor and protect the
Constitution and the divine, unalienable, Individual Rights it
guarantees, including the Right to a President who is a natural born
citizen of the United States of America that has not relinquished
his American citizenship. Our nation has endured similar disruptions
in the past, and will weather this crisis as well. Indeed, it is
both yours and the People's mutual respect for, and commitment to,
the Constitution and Rule of Law that insures the perpetuation of
Liberty.
As a long time defender of my
state and federal Constitutions, and in consideration of the lack of
sufficient evidence needed to establish your credentials as
President, I am compelled to lodge this Petition for Redress of
Grievances and public challenge to you.
Make no mistake:
This issue IS a Constitutional crisis. Although it
will not be easy for you, your family or our Republic, you have it
within your ability to halt this escalating crisis by either
producing the certified documents establishing beyond question your
qualifications to hold the Office of President, or by immediately
withdrawing yourself from the Electoral College process.
With due respect, I hereby
request that you deliver the following documents to Mr. Berg and
myself at the National Press Club in Washington, DC at noon on
Monday, November 17, 2008:
(a) a certified copy of your
"vault" (original long version) birth certificate;
(b) certified
copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names
Barack Hussein Obama, Barry
Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack
Dunham
and Barry
Dunham;
(c)
a certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship;
(d) a
certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of
maturity;
(e) certified copies of your admission forms for
Occidental College, Columbia
University
and Harvard Law School; and
(f) certified copies of any court
orders or legal documents changing your name
from Barry Soetoro.
In the
alternative,
in defense of the Constitution, and in honor of the Republic and
that for which it stands, please announce before such time your
withdrawal from the 2008 Presidential election
process.
"In a
government of laws, the existence of the government will be
imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our
government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good
or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime
is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds
contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself;
it invites anarchy."
Olmstead v. United
States, 277 U.S.
438, 469-471.
Thank you for your
understanding and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Schulz,
Founder
and Chairman, We The People Foundation for Constitutional Education,
Inc.
CLICK HERE
to make your secure donation to the WTP Foundation.
Click
here
to see how much money we have raised so far.