FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

Full-page USA Today Ad to Challenge Birth Certificate Authenticity

Paul Andrew Mitchell

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

Subject: Re: Full-page USA Today ad to challenge birth certificate authenticity

Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 8:44 AM

Thank you very much!

See also:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/supreme.court/mandamus.1.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/mandamus.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/intervention.prohibition.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/notice.of.intent.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/before.and.after.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/votingaz.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm

p.s. In point of fact, I continue to be very disappointed that

Mr. Schulz persistently fails to request documentary proof

that Judicial "Robes" -- like R. Barclay Surrick -- have all 4 credentials

required of them by the Constitution and pertinent federal statutes:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/foia.request.usdc.dpa.htm (PAST DUE)

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/letter.2008-08-05/letter.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/surrick/nad.affidavit.htm (PAST DUE)

Instead, he continues to refer to them as "judges" when

such a bad habit now assumes facts not in evidence!

The Oath of Office Clause is also an essential provision in the

Constitution for the United States of America:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3

... as are all Federal Statutes which implement that Clause:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/federal.judges.htm

... pursuant to the Supremacy Clause at 6:2:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:2

WHAT SAY YOU, MR. SCHULZ?

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)

http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 8:18 AM,  <JoanSharon@aol.com> wrote:

   

      Draft of WTP full-page ad

      to be published in

USA TODAY the week of November 10, 2008:

     

CLICK

      HERE to make your secure donation to the WTP

      Foundation.

      Click here

      to see how much money we have raised so far.

     

An Open Letter to Barack Obama:

     

Are you a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S.?

Are you

      legally qualified to hold the Office of President?

     

    

           

Dear Mr. Obama:

            On October 24, 2008, a

            federal judge granted your request to dismiss a lawsuit by Citizen

            Philip Berg, who challenged your qualifications under the "Natural

            Born Citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution to legally hold the

            office of President of the United States of America.

            Mr. Berg presented factual

            evidence to the Court in support of his claim that you are either

            a citizen of your father's native Kenya by birth, or that you became

            a citizen of Indonesia, relinquishing your prior citizenship

            when you moved there with your mother in 1967.

            In your response to the

            lawsuit, you neither denied Mr. Berg's claims nor

            submitted any evidence which would refute his assertions. Instead,

            you argued that the Court lacked the jurisdiction to determine the

            question of your legal eligibility because Mr. Berg lacked

            "standing."

            Astonishingly, the judge

            agreed, simply saying, "[Mr. Berg] would have us derail the

            democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of

            people voted and underwent excessive vetting during what was one of

            the most hotly contested presidential primary [sic] in living

            memory."

            Unfortunately, your response

            to the legal claim was clearly evasive and strikingly out of

            character, suggesting you may, in fact, lack a critical

            Constitutional qualification necessary to assume the Office of

            President: i.e., that you are not a "natural born" citizen of

            the United States or one who has relinquished his American

            citizenship.

            Before you can exercise any

            of the powers of the United States, you must prove that you have

            fully satisfied each and every eligibility requirement that the

            Constitution mandates for any individual's exercise of those powers.

           

            Regardless of the tactics

            chosen in defending yourself against the Berg lawsuit, significant

            questions regarding your legal capacity to hold this nation's

            highest office have been put forth publicly, and you have failed

            to directly refute them with documentary evidence that is routinely

            available to any bona fide, natural born U.S.

            Citizen.

As one who has ventured into the fray of public

            service of his own volition, seeking to possess the vast powers of

            the Office of President, it is not unreasonable to demand that you

            produce evidence of your citizenship to answer the questions and

            allay the concerns of the People. Indeed, as the one seeking the

            office, you are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer

            such evidence to establish your qualifications as explicitly

            mandated by Article II of the Constitution.

           

            Should you proceed to assume

            the office of the President of the United States as anything but a

            bona fide natural born citizen of the United States that has

            not relinquished that citizenship, you would be inviting a national

            disaster, placing our Republic at great risk from untold

            consequences. For example:

            ·

            Neither the Electoral College

            on December 15, nor the House of Representatives on January 6 would

            be able to elect you, except as a poseur - a usurper;

           

            ·

            As

            a usurper, you would be unable to take the required "Oath or

            Affirmation" of office on January 20 without committing the crime

            of perjury or false swearing, for being ineligible for the

            Office of the President you cannot faithfully execute the Office of

            the President of the United States;

            ·

            Your every act in the

            usurped Office of the President would be a criminal

            offense as an act under color of law that would subject the

            People to the deprivation of their constitutional rights, and

            entitling you to no obedience whatsoever from the People;

           

            ·

            as

            a usurper acting in the guise of the President you could not

            function as the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy and of the

            militia of the several states, as such forces would be under no

            legal obligation to remain obedient to you;

            ·

            No

            one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch would be required

            to obey any of your proclamations, executive orders or directives,

            as such orders would be legally VOID;

            ·

            Your appointment of

            Ambassadors and Judges to the Supreme Court would be VOID

            ab initio (i.e., from the beginning), no matter what

            subsequent actions the Senate might take as well as rendering any

            such acts by such appointed officials void as well;

            ·

            Congress would not be able to

            pass any new laws because they would not be able to acquire the

            signature of a bona fide President, rendering all such

            legislation legally VOID;

            ·

            As

            a usurper, Congress would be unable to remove you from

            the Office of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain

            political chaos including a potential for armed conflicts within the

            General Government or among the States and the People to effect the

            removal of such a usurper.

            As an attorney and sitting

            U.S. Senator, I'm sure you agree that our Constitution is the

            cornerstone of our system of governance. It is the very

            foundation of our system of Law and Order – indeed, it is the

            supreme law of the land. I'm sure you also agree that its

            precise language was no accident and cannot be ignored if

            Individual, unalienable, natural Rights, Freedoms and Liberties are

            to be protected and preserved.

            As our next potential

            President, you have a high-order obligation to the Constitution (and

            to those who have fought and died for our Freedom) that extends far

            beyond that of securing a majority of the votes of the Electoral

            College. No matter your promises of change and prosperity,

            your heartfelt intent or the widespread support you have garnered in

            seeking the highest Office of the Land, the integrity of the

            Republic and Rule of Law cannot, -- must not -- be put

            at risk, by allowing a constitutionally unqualified

            person to sit, as a usurper, in the Office of the

            President.

            No matter the level of

            practical difficulty, embarrassment or disruption of the nation's

            business, we must -- above all -- honor and protect the

            Constitution and the divine, unalienable, Individual Rights it

            guarantees, including the Right to a President who is a natural born

            citizen of the United States of America that has not relinquished

            his American citizenship. Our nation has endured similar disruptions

            in the past, and will weather this crisis as well. Indeed, it is

            both yours and the People's mutual respect for, and commitment to,

            the Constitution and Rule of Law that insures the perpetuation of

            Liberty.

            As a long time defender of my

            state and federal Constitutions, and in consideration of the lack of

            sufficient evidence needed to establish your credentials as

            President, I am compelled to lodge this Petition for Redress of

            Grievances and public challenge to you.

Make no mistake:

            This issue IS a Constitutional crisis. Although it

            will not be easy for you, your family or our Republic, you have it

            within your ability to halt this escalating crisis by either

            producing the certified documents establishing beyond question your

            qualifications to hold the Office of President, or by immediately

            withdrawing yourself from the Electoral College process.

            With due respect, I hereby

            request that you deliver the following documents to Mr. Berg and

            myself at the National Press Club in Washington, DC at noon on

            Monday, November 17, 2008:

(a) a certified copy of your

            "vault" (original long version) birth certificate;

(b) certified

            copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names

           

            Barack Hussein Obama, Barry

            Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack

            Dunham

           

and Barry

            Dunham;

(c)

            a certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship;

(d) a

            certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

            maturity;

(e) certified copies of your admission forms for

            Occidental College, Columbia

University

            and Harvard Law School; and

(f) certified copies of any court

            orders or legal documents changing your name

           

from Barry Soetoro.

            In the

            alternative,

            in defense of the Constitution, and in honor of the Republic and

            that for which it stands, please announce before such time your

            withdrawal from the 2008 Presidential election

            process.

            "In a

            government of laws, the existence of the government will be

            imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our

            government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good

            or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime

            is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds

            contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself;

            it invites anarchy."

Olmstead v. United

            States, 277 U.S.

            438, 469-471.

            Thank you for your

            understanding and cooperation in this matter.

            Sincerely,

           

            Robert L. Schulz,

Founder

            and Chairman, We The People Foundation for Constitutional Education,

            Inc.

           

            CLICK HERE

            to make your secure donation to the WTP Foundation.

            Click

            here

            to see how much money we have raised so far.