Response to: Anyone interested in the Supreme Court judges missing credentials..all acts are VOID
Paul Andrew Mitchell
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@
Subject: Re: Response to: Anyone interested in the Supreme Court judges missing credentials.
To: "Eileen Dannemann" <ncowmail@gmail.
Cc: stevemeyer@crosspat
Date: Friday, October 3, 2008, 12:52 PM
8 on the Supreme Court + Alex Kozinski on the Ninth Circuit were formally charged with multiple Federal FELONIES here, in connection with the failed ratification of the so-called Fourteenth
Amendment -and- sustaining same on the law books when the historical evidence clearly proves it was never ratified:
http://www.supremel
Read to the very end of this utterly shocking decision by the Utah Supreme Court:
http://www.supremel
My office DEMANDED that the Supreme Court remedy
http://www.supremel
(see first document: NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST)
After delivery of the latter DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST, my office confirmed that the Supreme Court continued to issue decisions which cited the Fourteenth Amendment as Law.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremel
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Registered U.S. Mail #R 756 488 761
Return Receipt Requested
c/o
general delivery
San
Rafael
California
state
zip
code exempt (DMM 122.32)
December
29, 1993
Hon. William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice
Hon. Harry A. Blackmun, Associate Justice
Hon. John Paul Stevens, Associate Justice
Hon. Sandra Day O'Connor, Associate Justice
Hon. Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice
Hon. Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice
Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice
Hon. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice
Hon. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street, Northeast
Washington, District of Columbia
Subject: NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST
Dear Honorable Justices:
Notice is hereby formally served upon you, both individually and severally, that conclusive evidence now available to me proves that the so-called 14th amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America was never properly approved and adopted. I am under a legal and moral obligation to intervene on behalf of the many millions of Americans whose status has been unlawfully subsumed under federal jurisdiction, because this was done without either their knowledge or their informed consent.
As required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 453 (Oaths of justices and judges), you have solemnly sworn (or affirmed) that you would administer justice without respect to persons, and faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all duties incumbent upon you as Justices of the U. S. Supreme Court under the Constitution and laws of the United States, so help you God (see revision
at 104 Stat. 5124).
Please take formal notice that it is quite simply impossible for you, or for any other public officials anywhere in America, to perform your solemn duties under this oath (or affirmation)
Pursuant to the Guarantee Clause (4:4) and to the opinion of the California Court of Appeal in Steiner v. Darby et al., 88 Cal.App.2d 481, 199 P.2d 429 (1948: the year of my birth as a Sovereign natural born Free Citizen of one of the United States), it is not only my Right, but also my Duty, to inform you that the weight of material and historical evidence proves thatthe so‑called 14th amendment is not now, nor has it ever been, a lawful provision in the Constitution for the United States of America. This proposed amendment failed to be ratified in accordance with the requirements of Article 5 of the Constitution. At the very least, the evidence which I now lay before you consists of the following public records and other documents:
State v.
Phillips, 540 P.2d. 936, 941 (1975)
Dyett v.
Turner, 439 P.2d 266, 270 (1968)
28 Tulane
Law Review 22
11 South
Carolina Law Quarterly 484
House
Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, p. 15641 et seq.
Because the available evidence indicates to me that all Federal and State judicial officers, without exception, have taken solemn oaths (or affirmations) which disagree with the Constitution for the United States of America as lawfully amended, I am now left entirely without any unbiased judicial forum in which to seek review and declaratory relief in the matter of the following federal questions
(1) The constitutional qualifications for election to the offices of President, Senator, and Representative retain the meaning they had when the Constitution was first drafted (see Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393-633 (1856)).
(2) There is still no constitutional authority for the status of a "citizen of the United States", unlike the proper status of a "Citizen of one Guerra, 40 Cal. 311 (1870): the term "United States" here means "States united"; see also Hooven& Allison v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)).
(3) There is still no constitutional provision prohibiting anyone from questioning the validity of the public debt, and freedom of speech is still guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.
(4) All provisions in Federal law are necessarily null and void, to the extent that they make reference, either implicitly or explicitly, to any section(s) of the failed 14th amendment.
(5) All provisions in State constitutions and statutes are likewise null and void, to the extent that they make reference to any section(s) of the failed 14th amendment (e.g. see the attached letter to the California State Lands Commission, to which all recipients fell silent).
DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST
Therefore, by virtue of the superior authority which is vested in me by my Creator, as a direct consequence of my natural birth as a qualified member of the Sovereign
People, "by whom and for whom all government exists and acts" (see Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)), and on behalf of each and every member of the Sovereignty known and lawfully identified as "We, the People of the United States" of America (see Preamble), I hereby demand and do hereby order you to Cease and Desist from any and all of the following official acts on your part:
(1) any and all official oaths or affirmations which are predicated in any way on the lawful ratification of the so‑called 14th amendment;
(2) any and all judicial decisions or determinations which are predicated in any way on the lawful ratification of the so‑called 14th amendment, including but not limited to:
(a) decisions or determinations which construe in any way the rights, responsibilities, States" as that term is used in any and all Acts of Congress and administrative rules and regulations promulgated by any employees of the Executive Branch of the Federal government (e.g. 26 C.F.R. 1.1-1(c));
(b) decisions or determinations which attempt in any way to enforce the administration of the individual income tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code upon the People of the 50 Union States, or upon their private property (see Treasury Decision 2313 and Brushaber's pleadings);
(c) decisions or determinations which uphold in any way the validity of the public debt of the Federal and State governments, acting in whatever capacity and through whatever agency, lawfully delegated or not (see 1:6:2);
(d) decisions or determinations which recognize in any way the lawful existence of a "State within a state", with particular reference to the political body defined by the population of "citizens of the Unite States" who may inhabit the 50 Union States at any given moment, howeverthose terms may be defined (see 4:3:1 and the case law interpreting the Buck
Act, 4 U.S.C. 105-113).
Until such time as you demonstrate officially that each and every one of you has executed a solemn oath which agrees with the Constitution for the United Statesof America as lawfully amended, I will take the absence of such an oath to mean that you are individually and severally biased in your understanding of the Constitution and that you are, therefore, unqualified to rule on these matters and hereby recused from doing so.
The burden of proof is now upon you to authenticate the Constitution which you agree to uphold, now and at all times in the future, using established principles of Law and the published rules of evidence.
I realize that this NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST may constitute an historically unprecedented act on my part, as an individual California Citizen who enjoys neither elected nor appointed authority of any kind at this moment in time. Nevertheless, this act is necessitated by the fact that there is presently not one single judge, magistrate, or commissioner anywhere in America whose oath of office is not colored by faulty (non-existent) provisions in the federal Constitution which they are sworn to uphold.
I realize also that this Notice and Demand must be general in nature and in substance, because of the far-reaching consequences which issue from the facts and Law which impugn federal "adoption" of the so-called 14th amendment. It is not my purpose here to anticipate, nor to delineate, each and every such consequence. Better minds than I should hesitate to assume such a weighty task by themselves.
Therefore, for the time being, I will leave it to you, and to the capable expertise on your respective staffs, to find and recommend the course of action which will best execute this Demand with maximum justice, liberty, and domestic tranquility. These are, after all, the stated goals of our chosen form of government in the united States of America (see Preamble).
Furthermore, I do explicitly reserve my unalienable Right to take whatever steps I deem necessary and proper to correct, at any time, a government which has now drifted so far off course, it hardly resembles the constitutional Republic it was designed to be (see also Declaration of Independence (1776)).
Thank you very much for your attention, and for your consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
California Citizen, on behalf of the
People of the united States of America
All Rights Reserved AT LAW
NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO
AGENTS.
NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO
PRINCIPALS.
copies: Marin
County Grand Jury, San Rafael
Bill
Clinton, President
Pete
Wilson, Governor of California
Barbara
Boxer, U.S. Senator
Dianne
Feinstein, U.S. Senator
Lynn
Woolsey, U.S. Representative
Janet
Reno, Attorney General
Drew
S. Days, III, Solicitor General
William
K. Suter, Supreme Court Clerk
Frank
D. Wagner, Reporter of Decisions
Alfred
Wong, Marshal
Shelley
L. Dowling, Librarian
attachment: letter
to California State Lands Commission
enclosures (under
separate cover to Librarian supra):
The
Federal Zone, hard-copy second edition
The
Federal Zone, electronic fourth edition
Chapter
11, from upcoming fifth edition
California All-Purpose Acknowledgement
CALIFORNIA
STATE/REPUBLIC )
)
COUNTY OF
MARIN )
On this
twenty-ninth (29th) day of December, 1993,
Anno Domini, before me personally appeared Paul Andrew Mitchell, personally
known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
Person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that he executed the same in His authorized capacity, and that by His signature
on this instrument the Person, or the entity upon behalf of which the Person
acted, executed the instrument. Purpose
of Notary Public is for identification only, and not for entrance into
any foreign jurisdiction.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
____________
Notary Public
C E R T I F I C A T E O F
S E R V I C E B Y M A I L
It is hereby
certified that service of this LETTER has
been made on interested parties by mailing one copy thereof, on this
twenty-ninth (29th) day of December, 1993, in a sealed envelope with postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:
Registered U.S. Mail #R 756 488 761
Return Receipt Requested of:
Hon. William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street, Northeast
Washington, District of Columbia
Copies via first class U.S. mail to:
Hon. Harry A. Blackmun, Associate Justice
Hon. John Paul Stevens, Associate Justice
Hon. Sandra Day O'Connor, Associate Justice
Hon. Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice
Hon. Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice
Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice
Hon. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice
Hon. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street, Northeast
Washington, District of Columbia
Dated: December
29, 1993
____________
Paul Andrew
Mitchell, Citizen/Principal, by Special
Appearance, in Propria Persona,
proceeding Sui Juris, with
Assistance, Special, "Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable
Rights.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Eileen Dannemann <ncowmail@gmail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Steve Meyer <stevemeyer@crosspat
Date: Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone interested in the Supreme Court judges missing credentials.
To: Eileen Dannemann <ncowmail@gmail.
This is unacceptable and eye opening news. Considering the vetting done by our congressional leaders, this is outright indigenous of the problem at hand.
Thanks for the info, it hit home with me. Please feel free to offer the following website to the author: www.howtobeinvisibl
Regards,
Steve Meyer
Eileen Dannemann wrote:
5 of the 9 on the Supreme Court are missing credentials now,
so there is no legal quorum there either:
http://www.supremel
The law /re:/ consequences of missing Federal credentials
is summarized here:
http://www.supremel
("all their acts are VOID")
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Paul Andrew Mitchell* <supremelawfirm@
Date: Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Berg v. Obama: United States ex rel. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
To: ncowmail@gmail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Paul Andrew Mitchell* <supremelawfirm@
Date: Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: Berg v. Obama: United States ex rel. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
To: BAFFauthor@aol.
Cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegr
Many thanks, Jon.
/*
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!*/
By the way, you could help a LOT by phoning
the Clerk of Court to make a routine inquiry
concerning the status of the United States'
APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION
http://www.supremel
/e.g./ has the Judge ruled on it and, if so,
what was the ruling, please?
My incoming U.S. Mail is routed thru a Forwarding Agent
in San Diego, so there is a necessary delay before reaching me.
I don't use telephones, for national security reasons,
so it's not easy for me to telephone the Clerk of that Court.
FYI: Berg and I already had one go-around here, in _Mariani v. Bush_:
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
(unexplained withdrawal after I annotated Berg's INITIAL COMPLAINT with a yellow highlighter,
to show where Berg was avoiding the Mossad Connection /like the plague/)
The larger problem now for the United States /ex rel. /is that
_almost all U.S. Courts of Appeal and U.S. Supreme Court
are *infiltrated with impostors*_,
so there is evidently _no remedy on appeal_:
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
5 of the 9 on the Supreme Court are missing credentials now,
so there is no legal quorum there either:
http://www.supremel
The law /re:/ consequences of missing Federal credentials
is summarized here:
http://www.supremel
("all their acts are VOID")
O'Connor, Kennedy and Breyer were also members of the State Bar of
California, and each turned up withOUT the license to practice law
that is required by sections 6067 and 6068 of the California Business
and Professions Code. All 200,000+ State Bar members have been
charged criminally here:
http://www.supremel
I am standing by, to answer any questions you may have.
Thank you again and Godspeed!
p.s. There is much additional (and free) reading
at the links below my name here ...
http://www.supremel
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremel
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
*DISCLAIMER: Forwarding email from someone else
does not mean that I endorse any of its contents.*
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:19 AM, <BAFFauthor@aol.
In a message dated 10/3/2008 10:11:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
supremelawfirm@
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
You are sure making this race interesting. I would like nothing
better than to see McCain and Obama dumped and make this a race
between Biden and Palen.
*
Jon Christian Ryter*
http://www.jonchris
*AUTHOR OF:
*Whatever Happened To America?
The Baffled Christian's Handbook
Prince Albert: Prophet of Utopia
------------
Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges?
Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and
calculators
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
http://www.supremel
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
--
--
Regards,
Eileen Dannemann
Standing director, National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW)
www.ProgressiveConv
917 804-0786
"It requires courage to utter truth; for the higher Truth lifts her voice, the louder will error scream, until its inarticulate sound is forever silenced in oblivion"…Mary Baker Eddy, Christian Science
To be removed from list, please hit reply and say "remove".
--
Regards,
Eileen Dannemann
Standing director, National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW)
www.ProgressiveConv