Subject: RE: [SLL] [WTP] SCOTUS Says "NO" -- What Must A Free People Do?

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1.html

"The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist  of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum."

There is presently no legal quorum at the U.S. Supreme Court,because of all the missing credentials, now confirmedby DOJ's written answers to our FOIA Requests, and by the habitual, protracted silence of the suspects, as follows:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm

(take it from the top!)

All of the following are now PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT -- in point of fact:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/roberts.john/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/thomas.clarence/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/ginsburg/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/breyer/nad.missing.credentials.htm (see "breyer" below also)

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/alito.samuel/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/breyer/nad.certificate.htm (see "breyer" above also)

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/kennedy/nad.certificate.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/oconnor/nad.certificate.htm (retired)

Bob Schulz is suffering from "not invented here syndrome":

Because he didn't bother to investigate the credentials required of the above personnel, his behavior suggests that he doesn't think they're important.

Are we upholding the Constitution or not, Bob??

Nevertheless, an OATH OF OFFICE is an explicit requirement that has been in the U.S. Constitution since DAY ONE -- at Article VI, Clause 3:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3

It is a FELONY to impersonate any officer of the federal government: 18 USC 912:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/912.html

"All their acts as such are VOID":

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm e.g.:

Without taking the oath prescribed by law, one cannot become a judge either de jure or de facto, and such an individual is without authority to act and his acts as such are void until he has taken the prescribed oath.

[French v. State, 572 S.W.2d 934]

[Brown v. State, 238 S.W.2d 787]

Schulz needs to read the New Testament books of Jude and 2 Peter,where the punishments are rather severe for false teachers, and teachers of falsehood.

.

p.s. There is much additional (and free) readingat the links below my name here ...

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)

http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm

On 2/27/08, Chet E. Davis <Chet@easypower.com> wrote:

Did he expect anything else?

Chet

From: Bob Schulz (DO NOT REPLY - Unmonitored Mailbox) [mailto:LMM-1P20RAP@givemeliberty.org]

Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 4:19 PM

To: Chet E. Davis

Subject: [WTP] SCOTUS Says "NO" -- What Must A Free People Do?

February 26, 2008

SCOTUS Says "NO" What Must A Free People Do?

This Saturday: Schulz Speaks in Tampa

Next: Schulz to Speak in TX, NM, AZ

On February 25, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States, without comment, voted again not to hear We The People v. United States. Thus, SCOTUS ducked its Constitutional duty, yet again, to declare the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment.

The Court elected not to be put into the position of having to declare the unalienable Right of the People to hold the Government accountable to the Constitution's essential principles, enumerated powers and explicit prohibitions.

Instead, the Court has chosen to conspire with the political branches in a collective decision to protect, preserve and enhance the treasonous notion that constitutional violations are mere issues of current public policy, subject only to the will of the majority of People voting in precincts and the halls of Congress.

Beginning this Saturday, March 1st, Bob Schulz will be speaking at various venues to discuss the matter at hand. Everyone is encouraged to attend one of these most serious meetings. There is no charge to attend. WTP will not be providing any food or beverage. The meeting will be all "business."

Saturday March 1st, 1 - 3 PM

Radisson Clearwater Central

20967 US Highway 19 N,

Clearwater, FL

(727) 799-1181 Click here for an event flyer (.pdf).

Saturday/Sunday, March 8/9: Austin, TX: (details later)

Saturday afternoon, March 15th Houston, TX (details later)

Sunday afternoon, March 16th Dallas, TX (details later)

Tuesday evening, March 18th Albuquerque, NM (details later)

Wednesday evening, March 19th Phoenix, AZ (details later)

Thursday evening, March 20th Tucson, AZ (details later)

Friday evening, March 21nd El Paso, TX (details later)

Monday evening, March 24th Austin, TX (details later)