FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

JUDGE ANNA VON REITZ: WHO OR WHAT IS IN CONTROL OF THE 'FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'?

JUDGE ANA VON REITZ

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

Who or What is in Control of the "Federal Government"?

 

By Anna Von Reitz

June 27th 2018

 

 

 

I was having dinner with a very elite group of academics and high rent businessmen. Doctors, lawyers, and literally--Indian Chiefs, business moguls, heirs of great fortunes, clergymen of renown--- and suddenly, there was a brief silence.

 

Into that silence I heard my own voice tossing this innocent-sounding question: "Who or what do you think controls the Federal Government?"

 

Since the "Federal Government" has become a vast mish-mash of separate corporate interests and privatized agencies and foreign mostly British and French commercial conglomerates, this is a somewhat disingenuous question. I was asking it almost as a rhetorical query to see what they would all say.

 

The President, according to more than half of our experts, controls the Federal Government.

 

The Congress, according to about a quarter of the pundits.

 

Political Parties split the rest of the vote with "Private Business Interests".

 

Not one single person in that whole assembly came up with the actual correct answer, which is ---- the States.

 

Not the States of States. The States.

 

So while we are moaning and groaning and seeking answers, it seems that we need to do some remembering as well.

 

We, the People of this country, are in the process of reclaiming our birthright, We are assuming our proper political status and assembling our Counties and our States.

 

There are no "citizens" of our States, except those that serve our States in some public capacity or office, as I do. The Justices, Sheriffs, and other Public Officers are known as "State Citizens".

 

By definition, a "citizen" owes an obligation of service to the government, either voluntary or paid, but most people occupying our States are simply Minnesotans or Vermonters or Oregonians, New Yorkers, Floridians, Virginians and so on.

 

So far as the "United States" is concerned, we are known as United States Nationals, not United States Citizens, not citizens of the United States, and certainly not US CITIZENS.

 

This is not actually confusing. It's just different than what we have been taught and led to suppose.

 

To get to the truth about our government and how it is supposed to be organized -- and run --- and by whom -- requires us to delve far more deeply into our own history than US History 101.

 


UnknownJune 27, 2018 at 9:22 AM

The Free State Movement did a study and noted that all it took to "turn" a State to constitutional gov't was ONE county, and all it took for the country was one State. Trouble was, they couldn't get enough people to move to a State to turn even one county. They tried it in various States but TPTB was able to have these people branded by the news as neo-nazis, racists, etc. etc. and the bran dead sheeple attacked the very people trying to free them. So...we will be stuck with this shinola until it collapses as the sheeple love their slavery so!!!

 

C. JohnsonJune 27, 2018 at 9:30 AM

unknown well said. the sheep attack their own leaders, to support the wolves! it's the wolves that are killing the sheep, not the leaders of the sheep. Maybe in this time, instead of the last time, people are awake enough to know the difference and will start taking action.

 

Dan CarpenterJune 27, 2018 at 9:55 AM

Indeed C. Johnson, lets hope enough people are awake. Let the action begin!

 

GamesmedicJune 27, 2018 at 3:16 PM

Well said to unknown and others. However I beg to disagree on the subject of citizens entirely. Judge Anna here seems to forget another article she wrote whereby she states that we are no citizens at all! We are all sovereign, or those who actually do the work to reclaim it, amongst other sovereigns, and I will leave it at that. I believe in the true teachings of yeshua hamashia. I give no credibility with an alleged "holy book" that has been plagiarized, bastardized, canonized to the point to where it only fulfills a Khazarian mafia infiltrated Jesuitic religion for 2 millennia, other than possibly historical value. I do believe that there is only one true life giving creator, the energy has to come from somewhere, it cannot be created nor destroyed, only transformed. But if we were truly under His/Her/Its will alone and subject to Him/Her/It, then we would have no free will at all and we would never see this kind of evil in the world. On the other hand one cannot be an anarchist for long as eventually someone would turn to violence and do the very same thing we see now and that it trying to enslave everyone else through their craftily created fraud. So we create governments to serve as our employees to protect the other sovereign people as well as the other employees subject to terms of their employment contracts.

 

The people are sovereign, that is a fact, subject to only the golden rule. Do what you may so long as you do not intentionally harm another with malicious intent, and do not infringe upon the rights of others. Simple as that.

 

It is when the employees start treating their employers as if they are not, is when the trouble starts.

 

Keep in mind, the employees can always quit their jobs and go back to being sovereign by nullifying their employment contracts and stop accepting the benefits. But how many really want to?

 

I am not trying to change the world for everyone. I am trying to change the world for me. I am intelligent enough to make it on my own. I can provide for myself. I can wield tools of all kinds. I can and do choose to be and remain sovereign. But the employees, acting like unhampered children have found the keys to the house, locked us up/in, and taken the car out for a mayhem joyride.

 

The Rothchilds, Morgans, Jesuits and the like have abused their sovereignty as well. However they as fellow sovereigns cannot nor will ever be subject to their hired servants and thus will never be held accountable by them. The only way we are ever going to see justice done to them is by common law courts, by common law juries comprised of other equal sovereigns, and common law Sheriffs to enforce the verdicts.

 

This is why I support Judge Annas' work and the http://national-assembly.net

Because quite simply, it is up to us.

 

not an FBI plantJune 27, 2018 at 9:35 AM

Truth unites. Falsehood divides. A penny saved will be taxed.

Spent cents can't be seized. Buy now!

 

SteveJune 27, 2018 at 11:27 AM

"United States National" vs "National of the United States"...

 

Are you talking about [8 USC 1101(22)(B)]?

 

(22) The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.

 

Personally I don't think I should owe any allegiance to the outta control "United States" so I think I would be:

 

(21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.

 

Notice: "state" vs "State"...

 

(36) The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

 

"state" is undefined here so it is the common definition

Websters #7:

a : one of the constituent units of a nation having a federal government the fifty states

b States plural : The United States of America

 

This is complicated stuff please be very specific...

 

Steven MatthewJune 27, 2018 at 12:39 PM

This comment has been removed by the author.

 

Steven MatthewJune 27, 2018 at 12:41 PM

Don’t complicate it then. Nowhere has she ever confused the terms “United States National” or “national of the United States”. It’s a good point to bring up though, as it could be used against someone that didn’t recognize the difference.

 

penny4yerthoughtsJune 27, 2018 at 12:46 PM

I am a Dutch/American national or Californian...remember not only did they de-natonalize into a US citizen but they also created a new corporate political status by misrepresenting your "race" as in white or black for example. You are neither.

 

AbbyJune 27, 2018 at 1:36 PM

Whose running the federal government? Oh thats an easy question. IDIOTS. Of course 99% of the People believer d.c. is the federal government, and they have no idea the States have any say in much of anything. I don't think the States have much say in anything, because we have a bunch of d.c. butt kissers with no spine. They too are mostly IDIOTS, as well.

 

D.C. gets a stupid idea, they notify the States Governors Conference and they convene and tell all the governors to do stupid stuff like increase or decrease their interstate speed limits; or ban smoking in public places; raise all your State Tax on cigs so people can't afford them and will be FORCED to stop smoking.

 

Oh they are all so caring for The People, that they don't want them to die of smoking, LOL. Never mind that they were the ones all along that put all the chemicals in cigs, which are harmful. Good example of their 'create the problem, then blame the people'.

 

The States are just as bad as D.c. is. Time to dig into the CAFR secret stash of money they have bilked their ''citizens' out of. And while you're at it, how about exposing just how much the retired State employees are getting in their State Pension payments each month. Then compare that with SS checks.

 

D.C. is an enemy of the People and SO ARE all the States.

 

bluecollarmovementJune 27, 2018 at 1:53 PM

It is the masses vs the classes. George Carlin said it best, "it is a big club and you ain't in it " . Those that know will never tell. https://scannedretina.com/2018/02/21/for-not-one-man-in-a-million-could-ever-figure/ Mercedes is for the classes, the rest is for the masses. I heard it said and it is true.

 

bluecollarmovementJune 27, 2018 at 1:56 PM

Here is what you are looking for if you want the correct answer.

https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/for-not-one-man-in-a-million-could-ever-figure1.pdf