- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

RE: Bill Benson

Elson Warman

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eldon Warman" <>
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: Bill Benson

Greetings Patrick and Jeffery,


It appears that Bill Benson was either led off the track by a 'red herring', or he is part of the continuing deceit relative to the 16th Amendment being the origin of the income tax in the USA.

The recent refusal by the Federal Judge to proceed with the Berg case against Obama also suggests that Lysander Spooner was so very correct in his appraisal of the US Constitution, and the fact that it is inapplicable to the American people.

The income tax is the process of the slave owner collecting its (the corporate UNITED STATES) property from the owned slave, or the fruits of the labor of the owned slave. It has nothing to do with constitutional or statutory law. The courts litigate income tax issues as a tort against the unalienable rights, among which is that of property, granted to incorporated bodies around 1860 by the US Supreme Court. As such, due process of law need not be a part of the legal processes against the wayward slave, as there is no constitutional protections for a disobedient slave - the property of a slave owner.

The following is a blog I wrote a while back explaining this:

The NAME GAME Explained

Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax is imposed based upon  the 'property right', and that property right is the property right of the corporate  Crown in Canada, and corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.

The 'Crown' is the administrative corporation of the Pontiff of Rome owned City  of London, the financial, legal and professional standards capitol of/for the  Vatican, The City of London is a square mile area within Greater London, England,  and is an independent city-state.

In the USA, the administrative corporation for the Pontiff of Rome is the UNITED STATES, and that corporation administers the Vatican capitol for military purposes called  Columbia, or the District of Columbia. The UNITED STATES also administers the 50  sub-corporate States of the United States of America, identified with the 2 cap  letters - CA, OR, WA, etc.

All adult humans are deceived into using the fiction name, as imprinted on the copy  of the birth certificate you receive when ordering it from Provincial/State Vital  Statistics, or to whatever source you apply. Although the birth certificate is of  somewhat recent origin and used to formally offer 'citizens' as chattel in bankruptcy  to the Pope's Holy Roman Empire owned Rothschilds' Banking System, the false use of  the family name goes back into the Middle Ages in England. Thus, it is with the family  name made a primary, or surname,  (Mister Jones), and the given names of the child  (Peter) made a reference name to the primary name. This is the reverse or mirror  image to reality. A 'family name' is NOT a man's name - it is a name of a clan -  a blood relationship. [Replace the name, Peter Jones, with your given and family name.]

We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use that name in all commercial and Government  dealings and communications. So, when we do use it, as 99.99% of the human inhabitants  of North America do, we supposedly 'voluntarily' attach ourselves, the free will adult  human, to the Crown/State owned property, called the 'legal identity name' as an  accessory attached to property owned by Another party..

The Crown/State then invokes the legal maxim, accessio cedit principali, [an accessory  attached to a principal becomes the property of the owner of the principal], where  the principal is the legal identity name as 'intellectual property', the owner is  the corporation called the Crown/State or UNITED STATES, and the accessory is the  free will human who has supposedly volunteered himself to be 'property by attachment'  of the Crown/State. An adult human who is property is, and by any other name, a  'slave', be it citizen, subject or freeman.

I would point out here that all concepts that teach that the relationship between  free will man and Government/corporate bodies is contractual are incorrect. All  supposed remedies in contract law, American UCC or Canadian PPSA are 'red herring'  diversions - some intended, and some in ignorance by the teachers.

As a slave, one's property in possession, including body and labor, belongs to  the slave owner 100%. And, the property right is a bundle of rights - own, use,  sell, gift, bequeath and hypothecate property.

Thus, ALL 'income' resulting from the owned human slave's mental and/or physical  labor belongs to the slave owner. That which is left with or granted to the slave  for his own use and maintenance is called a 'benefit'. In Canada, the 'return of  income' [the phrase itself tells the story] is called a T1 'tax and benefits  package'. The T1 or 1040 is an accounting by the slave of his fruits of labor   that belongs to the slave owner, and the prescribed 'benefits' that he may keep  or have back from withholding.

Thus, all income tax cases', in reality, result from fraud, illegal concealment  and theft by the accused slave of the slave owner's 'property'.

Going back to an above paragraph, we find that the attachment of oneself to the Crown/State owned name is 'assumed to be voluntary', as the Crown/State has no

 valid right to impose slavery upon adult humans against their will. And,  constitutional prohibitions of slavery only encompasses ' involuntary servitude',  not 'voluntary servitude'. Anyone working as an employee is in a contract of  voluntary servitude - direction and time control by, and obedience and loyalty  to the employer. Until we 'assumed to be slaves' get our heads around this key  to the lock that holds our chains of slavery around our necks and ankles, we  will continue to attempt to swim with that 100 lb ball chained to our leg.

Reports of unsuccessful attempts at paying government imposed debts using the  Canadian Bills of Exchange Act or US UCC provisions of settling an account  proved that there was no contract issue between a Canadian or American adult  human and the Government as is commonly taught by some patriot gurus. Under  contract, a 'bill' is a method of equalizing a contract - like value exchanged

for like value. However, under the 'property right' of a slave owner in regard  to property in the possession of an owned slave, a 'demand' for the property by  the slave owner, or the slave owner's agent (such as the IRS, or county tax  collector, or for a court imposed fine), is all that is necessary, without regard  to due process of law. Remember, ALL that a slave possesses belongs to the slave  owner. I am NOT saying you ARE a slave. I just point out to you that Government,  and its employees, judges and officers SEE you as a SLAVE.


However, since we are 'forced to', or 'obliged to' use the Crown/State owned  legal identity name in all commercial and government dealings, services and  communications, we can make a 'claim of right' under the Rule of Private  Necessity - with the necessity being the means to sustain and maintain our  life, as all food, shelter, clothing, means of travel and that which answers  our need for happiness all has to be obtained or used in the realms of  commerce. Briefly, commerce is all communications, contracts, and other  interrelations and interactions with other parties, which includes government.

This should counter the claim that we 'voluntarily' attach ourselves to  Crown/State property. Repeating - The Private Necessity is that we cannot  do anything in relation to life, liberty, property or due process of law  without using the Crown/State owned name, and thus we cannot sustain or  maintain our lives without that fiction name.

Also, a Freedom Of Information Demand should be sent to the Minister,  or Representative requesting the authority, date, means and methods by  which you, a free will man (m or f) became a slave owned by the corporate  Crown or State.

A process that has worked recently in Texas is the 'surrender' of the copy  of the birth certificate one has in possession to a judge, or the judge  assigned to a case where you, in the legal identity name, are the defendant,  in an 'in chambers' hearing. Some call this 'surrender' of the defendant  (the legal identity name) as being on the 'private side' using the Biblical  method of settling disputes privately if possible.

This is preferred to 'surrendering it in court' as that is on the 'public  side', and as a human presence in the court  room, the assumption that you  are an attachment to the legal identity name has already been made. And  being attached as an accessory to it, you become surety, guarantor and do  'represent' the legal identity name defendant.  End of document

Eldon Warman