Comment on Whistleblowers Questions to Story
Lynn Schmaltz
|
I'd like to comment on Whistleblower's questions to the following from STORY'S article:
"However, there is one very prominent factor within your article, that being "PAID IN US TREASURIES", which on the basis of the simplest assessment and not being privy to any written agreements on all of this, amounts to the fact that such payments are a liability of the US Government, not illegally taken from the Collateral Accounts. The BIG QUESTION now is, HOW WILL THE US GOVERNMENT SUPPORT ALL THOSE US TREASURIES? $300 trillion is a bit more than Pocket Money and far too much to cover up in the books Will this be, or is it already, another "Under the Radar" operation with illegal use of assets of the Collateral Accounts that will eventually collateralise those US Treasuries, or will they remain, forever and amore, a full liability of the US Government? This is followed by another valid point based upon the latter statement, "Watch out US Taxpayers, as it looks as if your Government has just committed you to 100 plus years of Hard Labour, because you have to pay for this, whether you like it or not."
Recently I was researching the federal court rules website and 'stumbled' across the following information. Remember, this is directly from their federal court rules.:
I'd like to comment on Whistleblower's questions to the following from STORY'S article:
"However, there is one very prominent factor within your article, that being "PAID IN US TREASURIES", which on the basis of the simplest assessment and not being privy to any written agreements on all of this, amounts to the fact that such payments are a liability of the US Government, not illegally taken from the Collateral Accounts. The BIG QUESTION now is, HOW WILL THE US GOVERNMENT SUPPORT ALL THOSE US TREASURIES? $300 trillion is a bit more than Pocket Money and far too much to cover up in the books Will this be, or is it already, another "Under the Radar" operation with illegal use of assets of the Collateral Accounts that will eventually collateralise those US Treasuries, or will they remain, forever and amore, a full liability of the US Government? This is followed by another valid point based upon the latter statement, "Watch out US Taxpayers, as it looks as if your Government has just committed you to 100 plus years of Hard Labour, because you have to pay for this, whether you like it or not."
Recently I was researching the federal court rules website and 'stumbled' across the following information. Remember, this is directly from their federal court rules.: "ARTICLE VIII. PROVISIONAL AND FINAL REMEDIES D.C.COLO.LR 67.1 BONDS AND OTHER SURETIES A. An attorney in any case, or a party or spouse of a party in a civil case, shall not be accepted as a personal surety on any bond filed in that case. B. No person, corporation, partnership, or other association or entity may act as his, her, or its own surety in a civil case. C. Where the surety on a bond is a surety company approved by the United States Department of the Treasury, a power of attorney showing the authority of the agent signing the bond shall be on file with the clerk. D.C.COLO.LR 67.2 DEPOSITS A. Deposits in interest-bearing accounts are subject to a registry fee of ten percent of their income. Further information on the required fee is available in the clerk's office. B. No deposit into an interest-bearing account shall be permitted without court order. All orders shall be approved initially by the clerk or a designated deputy before submission to the assigned judge. C. Funds may be deposited only in banking institutions approved by the court. 18 D.C.COLO.LR 67.3 WITHDRAWAL OF A DEPOSIT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 67 No cash or other funds on deposit with the court shall be refunded or returned to anyone other than the person or entity named on the receipt. When appropriate, the clerk may require a certified copy of valid letters of administration, or a notarized power of attorney, from the person or association named in the receipt unless exempted by order of a judicial officer. Refunds or returns may be obtained only by court order." Okay, now let's see what this says from another source:
D.D.COLO.L.CivR 67.3 COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM (CRIS) The Following shall govern deposits into the registry of the court in all civil actions: A. Receipt of Funds 1. Unless a statute requires the deposit of funds without leave of court, no money shall be sent to the court or its officers for deposit into the court’s registry without a written court order. All proposed orders shall be reviewed initially by the clerk before submission to the assigned judicial officer. 2. The party making the deposit or transferring funds to the court’s registry shall serve the written order permitting the deposit or transfer personally on the Clerk of the Court, or on a deputy clerk specifically designated. It shall be incumbent on the moving party to confirm that the appropriate action has been accomplished by the clerk in accordance with the provisions of the order. Failure of any party to comply with this rule will release the Clerk of the Court from any liabiloity for the loss of earned interest on the funds. B. Investment of Registry Funds 1. Al funds (except funds obtained through garnishments) deposited into the registry of the court will be placed in a form of interest bearing account. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) shall be the authorized investment mechanism. 2. Under CRIS, monies deposited in each case under section A.1. of this rule will be pooled together with those on deposit with the United States Department of the treasury to the credit of other courts in the CRIS and used to purchase treasury securities. The securities will be held as the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas in a safekeeping account in the name and to the credit of the Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, hereby designated custodian for the CRIS. 3. An account for each case will be established in the CRIS titled in the name of the case giving rise to the investment in the system. Income received from fund investments will be distributed to each case based on the ratio each account’s principal and income has to the aggregate principal and income total in the fund. Weekly reports showing the income earned and the principal amounts contributed in each case will be prepared and distributed to each court participating in the CRIS and made available, upon request, to parties and/or their counsel. C. Registry Fee 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the miscellaneous fee schedule established by the Judicial Conference of the United States and as set for in 28 U.S. C. ¶ 1914, the clerk will assess and deduct registry fees according to the formula promulgated by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. 2. No additional fee shall be assessed with respect to investments for which a fee has already been deducted prior to the establishment of the CRIS in this district. D.C,COLO.LCivR67.3 Contents DISBURSEMENTS OF DEPOSITS A court order to disburse funds must include the payee’s full name, complete address, and amount to be disbursed to that payee. If at least $10.00 of interest is to be disbursed to the payee, the counsel of pro se party must provide to the Clerk, Attention: Financial Deputy, a separate memorandum stating the payee’s social security or taxpayer identification number. The movant shall serve a copy of the order personally on the Clerk of the Court, or on a deputy clerk specifically designated. Failure of any party to comply with this rule will release the Clerk from any liability for loss.
Now, what funds could they possibly be talking about? The $350 filing fee? Here are the 2 cases recently filed by Paul and Lynn in federal district court here in Denver . Paul’s case is 07-cv-2458 and Lynn ’s is 08-cv-134
Here’s Lynn ’s
And here’s Paul’s
You can look up more cases for Colorado and some other midwestern states by doing the following (and it can be civil, criminal, misdemeanor, juvenile, you name it): 1. go wo www.dogpile.com 2. enter www.activequote.fidelity.com 3. Now select the heading called symbol lookup 4. On this site first select "mutual fund" and then select "fund" where you have the selection arrows. 5. Then put in the case numbers: here are some of ours: 03CR40, 03CR41, 06M150, 6. You can look up CUSIP online; it's a number assigned to any monetary instrument that is traded world wide. You'll see that the fund number 3, 6, etc. corresponds to the year.
Now, go back to the beginning of the email where whistleblower asks where all these treasuries are coming from. This is why they US has more people incarcerated than all other countries on the planet combined. it's a giant money racket. Lynn
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||