FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

FOLLOW THE THREAD: U.S. 'CITIZEN-PERSONS' ARE ALL COMMERCIAL 'VESSELS' ON THE SEA OF ADMIRALTY-MARITIME COMMERCE+ FEDERAL "EMPLOYEES" AND "OFFICERS" AREN'T THEY? - From "S"

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

AFTER READING THIS MYSELF, IS IT ANY WONDER THAT THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND FITZ ARE ACTING FOR THE EXECUTIVE THE WAY THEY ARE? 

If the Supreme Court has legal or commercial duty in some formal capacity and relatedness to the ‘Funding’, the capacity had better be reversed and undone if original intent of the parties is to fund ‘recipient’ People of the United States of America.  Otherwise, ‘recipient’ ‘persons’ and ‘citizen’ ‘vessels’ of the UNITED STATES-DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA will be the due receivers, but they are U.S. franchise corporate trusts in nature and their accounts, holdings, entitlements, benefits, etc. must pass through the ‘UNITED STATES’ corporation to get to where the funds are allegedly legally intended.  They are U.S. government operations. 

Without NESARA, most if not all funding is in the name of persons who have never done any ‘status change’ work to be ‘reinstated’ on the county [common law land] of their original jurisdiction ‘state’.  Hence, the corporate U.S. is acting as an impediment for any consideration of value coming or going into or out of its banking system via the SUPREME COURT and the EXECUTIVE.  That is what it is all about….. the “Unitary Executive” which Office embodies functions and operations of all three of the former ‘Branches’ of the lawful government.  The near Deceased united States of America is now being operated by/as the ‘new estate’, UNITED STATES, ‘ens legis’.

I am working on a series of ‘quick and dirty’ writings to show more of how the ‘duplication’ government worked on duplicating ‘citizens’ from ‘freemen’ ‘inhabitants’ by fraud, inducement, misrepresentation, obfuscation of material facts and issues of fact, etc.  We can now show in black/white letter ‘law’ that the judiciary of the UNITED STATES operates under Executive authority, as well the Legislature.  There is no ‘three branches’ ‘Separation of Powers Doctrine’ that means anything as it has in past American jurisprudence and “law”.  The federal ‘States’ are sub-jurisdictions or subsidiary corporate instrumentalities of the ‘federal’ UNITED STATES.  They are all of ‘federal character’, listed or commercially registered on DUN & BRADSTREET for ‘trading’ purposes, as well within the various EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES under control of the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INTERPOL, etc.  The below Supreme Court Rule 45, which was just passed along to me, as well as the 16 U.S.C. §2432 serve very well the intent to make a very immediate and effective point to the Peoples and Nations of the world, as well the People of America “without the UNITED STATES”, as well the ‘citizen-persons’ ‘within the UNITED STATES”-DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.”

If you are affixed in any  manner to U.S. Social Security, and/or ‘registered at birth’, you ARE diminished, decapitated to the maximum degree defined at law, and you are converted or transferred into commerce as ‘ens legis’, a legal-commerical entity, which has no rights, and only duties and obligations.  I will provide federal case law citation which has determined this to be a fact of ‘law’.  Not under Constitutional ‘law’, but under U.S. legislative municipal ‘territorial’ ‘statute-administrative’ commercial ‘law’.  In short, you, the real man, do not exist, and are already DEAD, survived only by your VESSEL and ESTATE name, number, and property.  The President of the United States ‘issues’ all process of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Follow the thread below:

Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, Rules, Adopted March 14, 2005, Effective May 2, 2005:

Rule 45. Process; Mandates

1. All process of this Court issues in the name of the President

of the United States.

2. In a case on review from a state court, the mandate

issues 25 days after entry of the judgment, unless the Court

or a Justice shortens or extends the time, or unless the parties

stipulate that it issue sooner. The filing of a petition for

rehearing stays the mandate until disposition of the petition,

unless the Court orders otherwise. If the petition is denied,

the mandate issues forthwith.

3. In a case on review from any court of the United States,

as defined by 28 U. S. C. § 451, a formal mandate does not

issue unless specially directed; instead, the Clerk of this

Court will send the clerk of the lower court a copy of the

opinion or order of this Court and a certified copy of the

judgment. The certified copy of the judgment, prepared

and signed by this Court’s Clerk, will provide for costs if

any are awarded. In all other respects, the provisions of

paragraph 2 of this Rule apply.

 

The above attached JFK ‘secured motion’ through his then counsel, Frederick Lee Bailey, is for “Guarantying Constitutional Rights and Civil Rights, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §3231………   “This motion expressed thereunto establishes constitutional jurisdiction by American jurisprudence also defined at 28 U.S.C. §451.

Furthermore, the document reads: 

“Subsequently, Title 28 U.S.C. §1869(f) defines courts of the United States by convening Grand-Juries; then effectively bridges the civil and criminal complaints together so far as lawful courts of the United States are concerned.”

”Accordingly 28 CFR, §0.96 b, the director of the Bureau of Prisons is authorized to transfer offenders to and from the United States of America at Public Law 95-144:  “Whomever is transferred from the United States of America to UNITED STATES custody must sign consent prior to transfer”; On all recent 20th Century (1900’s) government papers UNITED STATES is always captioned in all Capital Letters.”

Furthermore:

Under “Definitions” at 16 U.S.C. §2432 (8), “Personmeans

(8) Person

The term “person” means an individual, partnership, corporation, trust, association, and any other entity subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

Under “Definitions” at 5 U.S.C. §552a(a)(13), [Executive] “Administrative Procedures Act” 1934,  “Personnelmeans:

(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).

 

 

Under “Definitions” at 16 U.S.C. §2432(10), Vessel of the United States”  means:

The term “vessel of the United Statesmeans

(A) a vessel documented under chapter 121 of title 46 or a vessel numbered as provided in chapter 123 of that title;

(B) a vessel owned in whole or in part by—

(i) the United States or a territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States;

(ii) a State or political subdivision thereof;

(iii) a citizen or national of the United States; or

(iv) a corporation created under the laws of the United States or any State, the District of Columbia, or any territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States;

Now, back to “Form SS-5, Application for Social Security Account Number”, which is in the form of a contract for federal retirement benefits, which when ‘granted’ by the U.S., a federal corporation, 28 USC 3002, causes the Applicant to affix or attach to a Beneficiary-Recipient of ‘federal benefits’.   The Beneficiary-Recipient, NAME OF ACCOUNT AND RECORD is always spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, just like UNITED STATES is in the JFK ‘secured motion’ for constitutional jurisdiction.  The berth registration and the Social Security Account Number [license] is the same “person” of ‘berth’, ‘title’, ‘register’, ‘number’, and ‘flag’ of the UNITED STATES, a commercial VESSEL of the United States, which is the same as a ‘citizen’, ‘U.S. national’, ‘corporation’, ‘trust’, ‘territory’, ‘possession’ ‘owned’ in part or wholly, and ‘documented’ as and of the UNITED STATES.

NOTE:  If the ALL CAPS NAME is first created by ‘berth registration’ in admiralty jurisdiction-venue on some [federal] State of THE UNITED STATES  ‘Register’ [U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION], who gave the STATE authority to decapitate the new born and reduce the “live birth” [statutory-admiralty term] to the status of mere “Capitis Diminutio Maxima”?  

The STATE/UNITED STATES gave itself authority as it’s own presumed ‘sovereign’, because the registration gave appearance of voluntary parental succession or ‘ceding’ property, contractual rights to the product of their ‘union’, and gave by so registering a presumed unrecorded right of interest or claim on the name and property conveyed.  Because the UNITED STATES is a corporate commercial fiction, contracting by ‘registration’ or ‘application’ causes the matter to be commercial-contractual in nature, and is contiguous with an undisclosed binding agreement for the natural man so registered or having ‘applied for benefits’ to become affixed to the COMMERCIAL VESSEL owned by the UNITED STATES..  It is actually a means of ‘reification’, or ‘reif’ [theft or robbery, usually by taking possession without legal or lawful right or cause, usually by creation of fraudulent documents of title and record]; a form of taking possession by false title.  In the case of piracy, it would be the same as unlawful-illegal search/seizure/confiscation/arrest of a VESSEL, and claiming that which is seized/arrested under a new flag (Skull and Bones?) as newly acquired possession/territory, “citizen”, trust, corporation, franchise, “person” and/or VESSEL, whatever IT wants.

At the following website, this subject is addressed with clear and certain demeanor:   http://www.slaveshipamerica.com/

For purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system, it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS in legal and domestic income tax forms. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has deep significance. In 2003 the Idaho Observer conducted an inquiry into the meaning, or basis of capitalizing a natural person's name in official Government and legal documents. A proper answer was never found. However, Canadian Rights researcher Russell Porisky has conducted extensive studies into common law versus Admiralty law, and its attendant natural persons versus legal fictions. Porisky provides us with the answer. In book one of his five part study series on, Canadian Rights and Freedoms, Mr. Porisky, who describes himself as a natural person brings forth definitions from two credible sources…...

 

Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as… "To take advantage of  - To use to ones own advantage."

Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …

Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications.

Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John Doe) - The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man's family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.

Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John DOE) - A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.

Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) - The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

DiminutioLat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away; loss or depravation.

Capite. - Lat. By the head.

As Black's Law Dictionary explains, the full capitalization of the letters of one's natural name, results in a diminishing or complete loss of legal or citizenship status, wherein one actually becomes a slave or an item of inventory. The method by which the State causes a natural person to "volunteer" himself into slavery, is through forming legal joinder, implied or stated, with the entity or legal fiction (name all CAPS). Of course, most natural persons wouldn't willingly form such an unlawful but legally reductionist joinder, so trickery and obfuscation are used. The initial joinder is formed when a legal Birth Certificate is issued by the State, name in all CAPS. In fact, both the Certificate of Birth AND Social Security number, are for "inventory" control purposes, similar to the Amistad Schooner's manifest or those numbers or records used by legal entities or Corporations to track, account for, use and dispose of inventory. It is under the Admiralty jurisdiction Terri Schiavo's fate was determined, and under this alien fictional jurisdiction many of today's legal or other fictional entities such as "gay marriages" are fabricated. Commensurate with color of law, they appear to "be," but they are not. Indeed, under common law and the American Constitution, "gay marriage" is unlawful and an oxymoron (contradiction). This, no legal maneuver can change.

Whereas one may have legal recourse in a Corporate or Admiralty Court, no lawful or moral remedy will be found. Administrative directives of the legal tribunal or Admiralty jurisdiction, while having the color or appearance of law, may be legal but are in fact unlawful due to the nature or status of the Court's origin, which is predicated upon fiction. Admiralty Courts are in effect vastly inferior to the intentions and authority of those who founded the American Constitutional Republic.

Ens Legis” means ‘legal entity’.  It is non-human, ‘civilly dead’. It may be the name of ‘human capital’.  Or, under Executive Order 6260, August 1933, “personmeans:  “a Decedent”, “a dead estate”, “a public vessel”.

 

 

In short, when the ‘UNITED STATES’ was created from the ashes of the post-Civil War, united States of America, the transformation assumed the use of an all capital letters NAME, which is corporate in nature, and is inferior to the upper/lower case name spelling and word art of the United States of America, which is the landed creation of the landed several states and landed, or grounded, People of the soil/soul.  Corporations are dead entities, soul-less. 

The use of commercial instruments and commercial processes were/are used to cause the American People to enter and be entered into commerce with a commercial, already ‘dead’ entity, which the Ashka-nazi Khazarian Jesuit bankers well understood as being an abomination and a ‘lesser’ entity to the United States of America.  The inducement to ‘register’ ‘live birth’ and to contract for U.S. [federal, corporate] benefits, was done without any disclosure, knowledge, understanding, or informed consent of the American People, and is in FRAUD by TREASON.  Americans of the several states are not ‘citizens’ of the “United States” by birth, so how did we all become such?  False or misleading ‘contracts’ or agreements, which cause the party to traverse into a commercial zone, jurisdiction, and an entirely diminished system of political-law-monetary ‘authority’ than provided for in the organic Constitution and Bill of Rights, 1791.

In closing I would say:  “REI TURPIS NULLUM MANDATUM EST”:  “The mandate of an immoral thing is VOID”.  “A contract of mandate requiring an illegal or immoral act to be done has no legal obligation.”  The same admonition and axiomatic principles are set forth in well-settled American jurisprudence, which I presented the other day in a message titled “Fraud Citations”.

If anyone has any misunderstanding about what it means to be registered by one’s parents at birth, or to be assigned or to apply for Social Security Account Number and retirement benefits, or to be attached to an ALL CAPS NAME, which is on every legal, commercial, political, monetary-financial account, license, etc. that one is typically associated with, have them read the above definitions.  Just the definitions alone, combined with the DUN & BRADSTREET registry information is sufficient to establish cause for claims against the UNITED STATES, in Article III original Constitutional jurisdiction and American jurisprudence.  So, let’s bring our claims, again, but not in their courts!!

All of these ones who suck the substance of the life essence of others are “Captator” by “Captation”.

Captator means:  “A person who obtains a gift or legacy through artifice”;  while “Captationmeans:  “The act of one who succeeds in controlling the will of another, so as to become master of it; used in an individual sense. Succession.”  Master-slave.  Slave names even during the time of Nebekenezzer were given and spelled in All CAPITAL LETTERS.

 

PLEASE READ:  JFK Motion for Constitutional Jurisdiction with Comments by "S"

www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php

"S"