- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search


Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

From: "S"
To: Bellringer
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 6:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Question for Mr. Whistleblower from "S"

Dear Patrick:

In light of the disclosures of Mr. Whistleblower, which I find quite revelatory and fully consistent with the internal and external affairs of the “USA/US”, would you not agree that it is extremely critical to ferret out the true ‘identity’, character, nature, and ‘legal entity’ that he refers to throughout his answers to Mr. P?

In my opinion, if the USA/US is deemed a ‘bona fide’ ‘Legit’ Principal, Party of Interest, Holder in/of Due Course, Protector, “Member” of U.N., IMF, INTERPOL, WB, INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, and the trust Protector of the Combined Assets of the Global Debt Facility,  as well as party to the various non-classified and classified International Treaties etc. specified within his responses to Mr. P, it is absolutely imperative that the “real” “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” or the real ‘UNITED STATES’, please stand up and identify itself. 

My POINT:  The Nations and Peoples of the world have been dealing with entities appearing to be U.S.A./U.S., including the People of our Republic union, aka united States of America.  There is more than one “constitution” which has the same sounding word art within its title.  There exist known corporate charters, one in Delaware, to that effect, which I will get an archive certified copy of.  Can you request Mr. W to disclose his/her research as to the foundation documents in “law” which give rise to any real or presumed real status, standing, capacity of the government or national entities, [sovereigns]  referred to?  Who or what has been inside of all these Treaties and Agreements under those names?  This is where fraud on the People of America may turn really sour and result in disclosures that the U.S.A. or U.S. the Nations of the world thought or presumed, or were led to rely on as presented turns out to be ‘a horse of another color’.  That dark horse was/is controlled by certain power centers that one can but presume were fully intent on doing exactly what Mr. W is talking about in the first place.  The Debt Facility and its Assets were intended for great causes, and end up being the subject of long-term perpetrated frauds by the same people and institutions that constructively defrauded the American states and the People thereof. 

What is different, if anything?

Also, does Mr. W know about what has been reported on Fourwinds?   Is the Debt Facility dealing with the de facto chimera DUPLICATION, or the ORIGINAL?  As all of this came about well after the federal corporation went bankrupt in 1933, the events of 1945 and beyond were all built ontop of the constructive trust by ‘void’ or ‘result’ of the bankruptcy itself and the ‘reorganization’ going on.  Did the nations of the world just poo poo that and grant that kind of responsibility to the UST-IMF et al. under execution of Bretton Woods, wherein the United States and its Treasury ceased to be associated with the People and the uSA by every manner of fraud and deception?   What were the Nations dealing with? 

You can well imagine where I am going with this.  All you need to do is re-read the JFK document I sent to you in pdf and one can discern that JFK knew the distinction as well.  This fact, then, would be relevant to his being party to the Green Hilton Agreement, as well his E.O. 11110.

I don’t get it!!



----- Original Message -----
From: Whistleblower
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 7:32 AM
Subject: Response from Whistleblower to "S"
Dear S,

Thank you for your communication received via Mr Patrick Bellringer of

Reading your communication I come to the conclusion that you are a person of high intelligence, and able to route out various facts and documents that can assist in bringer this matter to the fullest attention of the public at large.

I will endeavour to assist and reveal information to you, but this will not be easy for which you will appreciate the reasons which are included in my response below.

The first and a very important point is that I, for one, was not aware and never have been aware, until revealed on and, that the United States of America was operating under Corporate mechanisms rather than the Constitution. The question therefore arises as to whether any Nation of the World realised this fact, or whether they, as would be considered relatively normal, just accepted that the United States was operating under Constitutional mechanisms.

This is also a matter that should be investigated by the United Nations on the basis that each member Nation submits and registers its Charter, whereby a Charter Control Number is issued by the United Nations and the published Charter is kept in the Archives of the United Nations for Reference and Record purposes.

It is usual that a Nations Charter is based upon its Constitution, so that the legal framework of any United Nations resolutions, treaties, conventions, etc entered into by the Nations of the World, take into account and are compliant with the numerous Charters, or, where any United Nations resolutions, treaties, conventions, etc, are contradictory in its content with a Charter, then the Nation would be required to amend its own laws, and subsequently its Charter, to allow its Charter and any United Nations resolutions, treaties, conventions, etc, to be compatible and compliant with each other.

The need to be able to review and verify the United States Charter held within the United Nations seems to be paramount in this matter. Whether the United States of America is a Constitution, a Constitution actually governed by an over-riding Corporate mechanism, or just plainly, a Corporate mechanism, must now be established.

To access such details within the United Nations may be very difficult. To give you an actual example of this …. I, personally, along with two former United Nations Senior Officers, all holding Level 3 Security clearance, was refused access to our own files on the grounds of them being classified “Top Secret”. Amazing, but that would only leave a very select few persons, holding level 1, or level 2 clearance and holding the right to access such files, yet this should be, in the case of Sovereign Nations, public information as it should derive from each Nations own Constitution. In our case it would be slightly different as we are a “Sovereign Entity with no subjects” as defined under The Treaty of Paris 1886.

Can you request Mr. W to disclose his/her research as to the foundation documents in “law” which give rise to any real or presumed real status, standing, capacity of the government or national entities, [sovereigns]  referred to?  Who or what has been inside of all these Treaties and Agreements under those names? 

What is different, if anything?

In respect of our own situation, NOTHING is different. Whichever way one looks, whichever part of the equation (and I refer to the USA being a Constitution, or a Constitution with an over-riding Corporate mechanism of governance, or just a Corporate entity), it all amounts to massive perpetration of Fraud, Fraud, Criminal Deception, Theft, Plunder, by specific National entities (Sovereign or otherwise), relative to the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, which was visibly evident during the period 1945 – 1995 when the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility were under the full control of the Trillenium Tripartite Trilateral Gold Commission, which in itself derived from a Pact between the Kingdoms and Colonial Powers of the World, London 1921.

The purpose and intent of the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, was one initiated by the Royal Families of the World (1875), Colonial Nations, and later (after the WW 1 and II) Nations who were liberated by the Allied Powers. The general purpose was to allow utilisation without dissipation of their combined wealth, for the benefit of all Nations of the World to bring about, or achieve, a better World balance and universal economic development.

An attempt to effectively “Hijack” the whole operation, from a Royal Family and Nations initiative to a Banking Family initiative even though the latter implied its cooperation, agreement, and approval of the Royal Family / Nations initiative; was made in 1910 JEKYLL ISLAND TREATY:-

President Theodore Roosevelt had signed into law the bill creating the National Monetary Commission in 1908, after the tragic Panic of 1907 had resulted in a public outcry that the nation’s monetary system be stabilized. Senator Nelson Aldrich had led the members of the Commission on a two-year tour of Europe, reviewing and discussing monetary systems, their problems and advantages. He did not immediately make a report on the results of this trip, nor had he offered any plan for banking reform. Aldrich had compiled a number of questions and problems, together with one possible solution. In order to make a comprehensive and viable plan, he brought together the best financial minds he knew of in the United States at Jekyll Island to go through what he had learned, and there to devise a complete and workable financial system.

Accompanying Senator Aldrich were his private secretary, Shelton; A. Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and Special Assistant of the National Monetary Commission; Frank Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, Henry P. Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company, and generally regarded as Morgan’s personal emissary; and Charles D. Norton, president of the Morgan-dominated First National Bank of New York. Joining the group just before the train left the station were Benjamin Strong, also known as a lieutenant of J.P. Morgan; and Paul Warburg, a recent immigrant from Germany who had joined the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb Company, a master of deception and planning, who was to prove the real architect of the modern financial system.

Their objective was the devising of a plan to create fiat currencies to replace the Gold Standard as the support structure for currency issue throughout the world. The understanding of the need for this plan came from the precepts of international finance espoused by Cecil Rhodes in his treatise of 1872. The Jekyll Island Plan was designed as a device to manage economies so as to facilitate trade and growth through necessary money supply expansion and contraction based on trade and the good faith and credit of each nation. Kings and Emperors of the world would later see this as the only option to save the world from its own self destruction. The Gold Standard had to go if the world would be safe.

This meeting planned the creation of “the Aldrich Act”, which in turn led to the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, and eventually to the creation of a world wide system as would be agreed in London in 1921 by the Leaders and Kings and Emperors of the World.

In theory, the “Hijacking” factor appeared to have been resolved by the London Treaty 1921, otherwise known as the TRILATERAL TRIPARTITE TRILENNIUM PACT BETWEEN NATIONS (TTT Pact and Revisions 1921-29). It was Emperor Hirohito of Japan that had structured the system / operation that was acceptable to all participating Nations.

This secret agreement lead to the Nations of the World centralizing assets into a common and secret system in order to compel all nations to abide by the rule for fiat currencies as per the Plan of the Experts of 1910 (Jekyll Island Plan). Under terms of this agreement, all gold and other wealth that was being used for backing currencies may not be personally owned and would become the property of a centralized system and be secreted, thus an even opportunity would exist between nations to establish fiat currencies. This was anticipated as one of the best means of reducing the risk of wars between nations through the creation of economic stability.

Though never taught in economic schools of today, the TTT Pact had the most profound effects in creating international financial and political stability. It was not fully implemented until after World War II, and then would have revisions to cope with unforeseen international trade repercussions that would occur forty years later. In the creation of the establishment of vision and understanding of the Kings and Emperors and other leaders who attended, the decisions that had to be made were forever sealed, secrecy being essential to the parliamentary code and context of “no personal sovereign responsibility”.

The decisions were made from pragmatic necessity, based on the growing technological capacity of human kind for self destruction, and an understanding of the changing nature of war. The economic issues that were the primary precursor of war had to be eliminated as a pretext of destruction, and the right of equality among the nations had to exist if nations were to live in peace. The TTT Pact was a political solution in nature, but it led to the greatest impact on the World’s financial systems of any Pact or Agreement in the history of human kind. 

This Pact led to the creation of the Bank for International Settlements on January 30, 1930.

This Treaty, together with the general principles of the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, was further enhanced by the -  THE SECOND PLAN OF THE EXPERTS, 1929 

Finalized, June 7, 1929, the Plan of the Experts became the key as to how the terms of the Tripartite Trilateral Trillenium Pact between nations could function under an international arrangement, setting into place the plan for a Central Bank to the World’s Central Banks. Based upon Article X, paragraph 2 of The Hague Agreement with Germany, this plan provided the base for the granting of operational immunities for the BIS and it’s assets. All signatories to the BIS convention are automatically bound by its provisions. All assets of the International Collateral Combined Accounts, today deemed under depository control of the Fed system/BIS, but placed, under the sole jurisdiction and dispositional control of the Sole Arbiter, Owner and Controller. Article X, paragraph 2 states “The Bank, its property and assets, and also the deposits of other funds entrusted to it, on the territory of, or dependent on the administration of, The Parties shall be immune from any disabilities and from any restrictive measures such as censorship, requisition, seizure or confiscation, in time of peace or war, reprisals, prohibition or restriction of export of gold or currency and other similar interferences, restrictions or prohibitions”. 


On January 20, 1930 the Bank for International Settlements was instituted by the Central Banks of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Belgium, Italy, France, Germany, Japan. These, on the one part, then forming the Convention Respecting the Bank for International Settlements with the Swiss Confederation on the other part, essentially making Switzerland the central depository country for the member governments of the BIS. United States Government and or the Federal Reserve did not participate, but an organization made up of the Banks and Institutions that owned the Federal Reserve System were involved as a part of the BIS formation. This is of particular interest, because the stated and claimed purpose for the establishment of the BIS was to manage war reparations payable by Germany. One might wonder why the United States Government did not participate and why Japan did. The answer lies in later actions and conventions.

Following Germany's defeat in World War I, the Allies and the US (which regarded itself as separate from the Allies) said that Germany had to pay for the war under a system of "reparations". The repayment system never functioned fully. In 1930, with yet another attempt to get the reparations system working, the BIS was created to handle what were supposed to be flows of money from Germany into the Allies and the US. When Hitler came to power in 1933 he stopped the system entirely. However, the central bankers liked the BIS idea and kept it going. The need for such banker's for banker's bank had become clear a century prior, with the increased expansion of national economies and the important role of stable banking for those economies. With the similar increase in international trading, there had to be a system for co-ordinating the role of banks across borders.

The BIS primary purpose soon became and still is, to promote cooperation among central banks and provide additional facilities for international financial operations. The BIS’s statutes provided for U.S. representation on the Board of Governors, but the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank did not choose to do that until 1994.

The United States was not a member of the BIS Board of Governors during World War II, Thomas McKittrick the Managing Director of the BIS through the war years was American, representing American interests. The United States gave some support to the liquidations of the BIS, partly because the Bretton Woods agreement of 1944 provided for new restitutions to deal with post-war monetary issues.

Which was then followed by:- ESTABLISHEMENT OF FAR EAST COMBINED DEPOSITORIES FOR HARD ASSETS (South East Asia 1932-1945).

Contrary to folklore, most assets now known to be deposited in Indonesia and Philippine Islands, Thailand, Cambodia etc., (so called Soekarno Gold, Yamashita Treasure and or Marcos Gold) were deposited in those countries through the period of 1932-45. At this time the work was carried out by Japanese laborers, later by Japanese troops under agreements forged at the TTT Pact, 1921. The secreting of these assets was for the benefit of the International Community as per those agreements and was largely executed through Japan’s interest in the BIS through the war years, an institution primarily made up of Axis Power countries, Great Britain and a group of American Banks.

The whole system then continued with: -THE BRETTON WOODS AGREEMENT (New Hampshire, USA, 1944.)

A plan devised primarily by John Maynard Keynes with considerable input of Harry Dexter White to resolve the issue of financing the reconstruction of the world from the ashes of World War II. This plan required a deviation from the TTT Pact in order to expand the democratization of trade and wealth and to redistribute or recycle currency from strong trade surplus countries back into countries with weak or negative trade surpluses. Part of the plan was to have the US Dollar replace the Pound Sterling as the medium of International trade, with the US Dollar tied to the good faith and credit of the Government of the United States.

This Convention produced the Tripartite Gold Commission, the Marshall Plan, The Bank for Reconstruction and Development (now known as the World Bank), and the re-invention of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) with the theories of Keynes today known as the Keynesian Theory.

What needs to be noted is that this agreement made by Allied powers in 1944 required assets held under the control of Axis powers to make it work. This was only possible due to the collusion between Axis and Allied powers through the intermediary role of the BIS. This is essentially a good thing as it is a mechanism by which the world can financially function, regardless of war or other undesirable human behaviour.

Followed by: - THE BIS AGREEMENT WITH THE ALLIES (Bern 1948) 

This agreement allowed for the continuation of the activities of the BIS and the continued secreting of the wealth reserves of the world, this to be held in a common system to the better benefit of the world. Not critical for what it did, but critical for what it sanctioned and did not do.

Then followed by: - THE GREEN HILTON AGREEMENT (Geneva 1963).

 By 1961, Keynes predictions of a world monetary crisis began to become a reality. This problem was brought about by the lack of sufficient currency (especially US Dollars) in world circulation to support the rapidly expanding international commerce. The World needed US Dollars beyond the capacity of the good faith and credit of the United States Taxpayer in order to facilitate trade. It was not possible to break the Bretton Woods treaty due to the possible damage of the stable core of the world’s economy as this had the potential of leading to another major war. To compound the problem, the majority of dollars in circulation were in private banks, multinational corporations, private businesses and individual bank accounts.
In 1963 the gold that had been entrusted to the care of President Soekarno was recalled by the Nations to underpin the issuance of further US Dollars in order to further facilitate international trade. Under this Agreement, Soekarno (as the International Trustee Holder of the Gold) began the process of repositioning the gold that had earlier been entrusted to the care of the Indonesian People, back into the banking system to create a fractional backing for the US Dollar. Initially this was managed under the arbitration of the Tripartite Gold Commission in The Hague as per the decisions of the International Community through their Government representatives at the Innsbruck/Schweitzer Conference and its later revisions. Under the agreement signed between President Soekarno and President John Kennedy, was that control of these assets would cede automatically to US upon the fall from power of President Soekarno. This occurred in 1967. The potential of this agreement led to Executive Order 11110 issued July 1963, which would have provided the Department of the Treasury the power to issue United States Dollars. Within two weeks after signing the Green Hilton Agreement which would have then enabled consolidation of EO 11110. Kennedy was assassinated a few days after his signing of the Green Hilton Agreement. With the death of Kennedy, the authority granted to the Treasury was never taken up.

Soekarno was awarded a 2.5% interest in the assets by the International Community in return for his services. He willed all the documents of guarantee and obligation to his Teacher ***** ***** ******** and his heir, ** **** *** ********. To this day, these agreements stand to be honoured (which was accommodated in full under the “RESPECTING THE RIGHTS TREATY (BANGKOK) 2003). The assets were placed into the International Collateral Combined Accounts that form the Global Debt Facility.

 While an apparently innocuous document to read, in it’s proper and full interpretation, The Green Hilton Agreement is one of the most profound agreements made between Presidents of any two countries within the twentieth century, and most probably, in the history of the world, particularly so as this agreement was made between a President of the United States and the Trustee of the hidden, but combined wealth of the world. These assets are not the property of the United States, but centralized assets under the authority of a centralized system, to be used as independently deemed to be for the better benefit of the World.
Then further followed by: - THE SCHWEITZER CONVENTION (Innsbruck, Austria, 1968 and Revisions to present date)

Under this convention, the system for utilization of combined and secreted assets was determined by the Nations of the World. This allowed for the US Dollar to be backed fractionally by the assets of the world. It also rationalized the rights of call on previous issued bonds by various Governments in order to maintain the financial system of the Bretton Woods Convention.

I could go on and on, but the above are the main Treaties as I have referred to before.

I should also clearly point out to you that these documents, or official copies thereof, have been viewed by myself, our Legal Counsel, and other officers of our institution. Our Legal Counsel is the only person who has reviewed ALL documents and their FULL content, having previously agreed, in writing, to TOTAL SECRECY AND NON-DISCLOSURE of same. However we, as Officers, were not allowed to take copies or retain copies of any description for security reasons. It is for this reason that I personally cannot provide copies of such documents, but even if I held copies, I would be reluctant because of the Security Laws and Official Secrets Acts that we are constrained by.

Having said that I suspect that our Legal Counsel did actually retain copies of all documents and secreted them away for future reference. Unfortunately, our Legal Counsel was assassinated in Switzerland (Jan 2006) following his, and his team’s legal work in bringing the Swiss Bank, UBS who are the primary Custodians of Assets held within the International Banking System, into legal order under the Treaties, which has still not been achieved, or resolved.

The details above are a legal summary of all factors undertaken by our Legal Counsel and some of our officers, prior to his untimely and questionable death.

You will appreciate that throughout all of the above, it only refers to Nations of the World it does not add a definition to the word “Nations”. However, as the LEAGUE OF NATIONS, subsequently the UNITED NATIONS were the main body of Nations as a collective body, of which the Axis and Allied Powers, plus the Colonial Nations, and subsequently (following WW I and II) all liberated Nations were all part and parcel of, plus the fact that the majority of Treaties / Conventions were instigated, initiated by the League of Nations (United Nations), plus the fact that the implementations, structures, appointments, etc were undertaken through the United Nations Security Council, it is a general consensus that the United Nations was the primary party behind the organisation of Nations, and the party that acted to bring all Nations together for the purpose of the various Treaties, on the grounds that no one Nation or Group of Nations had authority to compel other Nations of the World, other than through the United Nations as a collective body.

I will now refer to the issue of the United States of America. I personally, and I am reasonably certain in stating that no one of our organisation has ever investigated the status of the United States of America, as a Sovereign Nation and being part and parcel of the Treaties. We do not know therefore whether the USA executed same as a Sovereign Nation under a Constitution, or, a Sovereign Nation under Corporate mechanisms, or simply a Corporate mechanism. I feel comfortable in stating that it is the United Nations as a Collective Body, to ensure that each member Nation is legally entitled to execute such Treaties based upon their Charter, registered and held within the United Nations archives.

In our / my professional opinion the USA was, for the purpose of the Treaties, considered a Sovereign Nation, otherwise it would not have been allowed to execute such documents as the United Nations is a Collective of Sovereign Nations as defined within each and every Charter of such Nations. The United Nations is not, under their own Charter, a collective of Corporate Entities, or, a Collective of part Sovereign Nations and part Corporate Entities. I have personally sought opinions on this matter from the two (2) former Senior Officials of the United Nations, whom I have referred to herein. Their opinion, based upon their past positions within the United Nations, is that the United Nations is a Collective of “Sovereign Nations” based upon each Sovereign Nations Constitution and Charter held within the United Nations.

However, there is another conflicting argument to this, and that is where Corporate Entities, such as the BIS, and various International Bankers, were part and parcel of structuring and designing the system from 1910 onwards. The question is, did they execute Agreements, Treaties, or otherwise, or, were they just part and parcel of the designing and structuring team whereby their ideas were placed before the Nations of the World for approval. I believe the latter of these, but until documents, treaties, or otherwise are further reviewed and investigated, one will never know the answer to this question. I can state that I never considered the Corporate angle in this matter and therefore never questioned the status of the Signatories to these documents, as to whether they were in fact Authorised Signatories on each and every Sovereign Nation, or, as may be the case, Signatories of both Sovereign Nations and Corporate Entities. I further state that it is not our position to question the authenticity of Sovereign Nations. That is the prerogative of the United Nations and indeed, the people of each and every Sovereign Nation. It is therefore for the people of the United States of America who should be questioning the Sovereign and Corporate entity factors and correcting same, and at the same time, ensuring that all / any corrections are legally registered within the United Nations. However, I will refer the “Sovereign Nation” status of the USA and its bearings on the execution of documents and Treaties to our Cabinet, for them to investigate further.

The outcome of this may have a bearing on many factors surrounding the Treaties etc, however, it does depend upon whether the USA Government and successive Governments, deliberately deceived the whole world, for whatever reason, by implying it was a Sovereign Nation within its Charter and under its Constitution, when in reality it was a Corporate Entity controlling a Sovereign Nation.

Also, does Mr. W know about what has been reported on Fourwinds?   Is the Debt Facility dealing with the de facto chimera DUPLICATION, or the ORIGINAL?  As all of this came about well after the federal corporation went bankrupt in 1933, the events of 1945 and beyond were all built ontop of the constructive trust by ‘void’ or ‘result’ of the bankruptcy itself and the ‘reorganization’ going on.  Did the nations of the world just poo poo that and grant that kind of responsibility to the UST-IMF et al. under execution of Bretton Woods, wherein the United States and its Treasury ceased to be associated with the People and the uSA by every manner of fraud and deception?   What were the Nations dealing with? 

I am aware of reports posted with, but I must admit, I do not deep read all of them. I am aware that some reports clearly indicate a Corporate Entity or Entities are controlling the USA, not the Government under the Constitution, but our only interest is in the fact of whether it affects, or deliberately affects, any of the Treaties executed by the USA, whether related to the Combined International Collateral Accounts or otherwise.

The US Constitution and its possible control under, or by, Corporate entities, is really a question / matter / issue, to be resolved by the people of the USA, as neither we, or any other Nation can become involved with the Internal operation, status, structure, or otherwise of any individual Nation, and we certainly do not become involved in Politics.

In respect of Chimera Duplication or Original. I assume you are referring to the mythical creature with a Lions Head, Goat’s Body and Serpent’s Tail, as I know of no other reference to Chimera.  So in answer to this matter, if you are referring to same, then the answer, as far as I am aware, and I am not party to all matters, the answer is no.

Referring to your question, “Did the nations of the world just poo poo that and grant that kind of responsibility to the UST-IMF et al. under execution of Bretton Woods, wherein the United States and its Treasury ceased to be associated with the People and the USA by every manner of fraud and deception?   What were the Nations dealing with?”

Unfortunately, until we all know the answers as to whether the USA executed, and was allowed to execute as a Corporate Entity rather than as a Sovereign Nation, I really cannot answer the question. However, I do appreciate the question and its importance and relevance, not only to the USA as a Constitution, and its people, but also to every other Nation of this World and their people.

If there was massive Fraud and Deception, the question arises as to whether the other Sovereign Nations of the Axis and Allied Powers, the Colonial Nations and the Nations liberated after the two World Wars, or part thereof, were party to such Deception and Fraud against the rest of the World and its People, or were they just as naïve as every other Sovereign Nation. Is this the very reason why the USA, the U.K, France, Switzerland, Japan, and other Allied Powers have just continued plundering and illegally using the assets of Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility for their own purpose, knowing that in reality that the US having possibly executed as a Corporate Entity, would possibly void and invalidate the obligations, liabilities, responsibility, under the Treaties, or, is it just a simple question of knowing that they are legally bound under the Treaties, but prefer to ignore it, so that they can continue with their Fraud and Deception.

The latter of these would appear to be more feasible and plausible, based upon the fact of their continuous denials of our existence, the total lack of cooperation from the “Protectors”, the controlling factor of the IMF, World Bank, United Nations, International Financial Corporation, the continuous stream of propaganda put out by various parties including the USA Government, the deliberate obstructions, barriers etc, placed before us preventing proper and maximum use of the Combined International Collateral Accounts for the benefit of ALL Nations of the World.

This is further supported by our proposals to the G8 in 2005, relative to AFRICA , which were discarded and ignored by the G8, but which would have resolved the African problem, taken it away from the International Political Arena, and given those Nations and their people a far better future. However, Africa holds vast mineral resources, that in my personal opinion, the Allied Powers etc, will not allow the African Nations to benefit from, thus keeping them in Poverty and Starvation.

Why, it should be asked, should anyone, whether a Nation, Government, Government Authority, a Collective of Governments, or similar, go to the extreme, and I do mean extreme,  lengths that they have done, or implemented, to prevent us from operating correctly in the interest of the Nations of the World and their People, and in accordance with the terms of the various treaties, when, if they know  the legal standing and validity of such Treaties may be highly questionable, or, doesn’t exist, based upon the fact that the USA executed same as a Corporate Entity not as a Sovereign Nation; such extreme measures are totally, or would be totally unnecessary.  

For part of the answer to this we come back to the Internationally illegal, possibly Nationally illegal, Presidential Decrees executed by Reagan, the non-recognition of the BIS by the USA until 1994, The Decrees and Treaties executed by President J.F. Kennedy and his subsequent assassination, the attempted “Hijack” of the system in 1910 by the Bankers involved, plus the theft of QE II’s Gold from the UK, which is also part of the Collateral Accounts, plus, why did the USA admit to one theft / illegal use in 1998 / 9 and pay to the Collateral Accounts a sum in value of fractionally just under $3 trillion USD in the form of Gold Backed Freddie Macs, Fannie Maes etc. The fact that up until 1995 it was those very Allied Powers that actually controlled the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, whereby they did not disclose same then to other countries because they took full advantage for themselves during that 50 year period. They have not disclosed it following 1995 either.

As a person with a Law Degree, when people or parties do not disclose something that is, or was important, or relevant, then that person or party is hiding something which they do not want to reveal as it would possibly be self incrimination of an act contrary to law, whether civil or criminal law. At the same time, devious / criminally minded persons do sometimes run two similar operations side by side, unknown to anyone, whereby one operation is legitimate but carries all the obligations and liabilities, whereby the other operation benefiting from the assets, profits, limited liability status, etc. There have been many examples of this type of situation disclosed publicly over the years, relative to Corporate Entities, but I have never seen it applied to Government (Sovereign Nation) and Corporate Entity situations until the latter was disclosed within postings on and, but it is possible, practical and feasible in law provided its intent is legal..

I must state that personally, and I do reiterate the word personally, my belief is that this is an elite group of people (call it the organisers of the One World Order, if necessary) of which both the US Government, the UK Government, or specific parts thereof, together with others, are major parts of this deception and fraud, whereby they are deliberately not disclosing reality to their own people, not disclosing our existence, not complying with International Treaties, and placing all sorts of barriers in our way, because  they desire to exercise their Colonial Powers, contrary to the provision of the Treaties, and quietly maintain a strong power base over all and any other Nation in the World, in which they will utilise the IMF, World Bank, United Nations and any other organisation they control, or have majority control over, to do this.

Unfortunately, there are many more questions in this matter, than there are answers at the moment, but you can be assured, we are doing all that we can, but Sixty (60) years of abuse, cannot be resolved in 10 years. If the abuse extends to Deception and Fraud by specific Nations of the World, including the USA, then our task of introducing the necessary corrections, and that of other Nations of the World will be enormous and certainly longer in term than 10 years.

To give another example to you that certainly has a relevance to this situation. We are supposed to receive our salaries directly from the United Nations Budget. However, the conditions they wanted to apply were that we only received salaries if we did exactly what we were told and when we were told. In other words, they wanted total control over us, which we would not accept and certainly do not condone. Instead we draw salaries as and when possible from various transactions, or, alternatively finance the institution, our expenses, etc from our own pockets / resources. That is how corrupt these people are and that is how they will remain until the other Nations of the World and the People of the World realise what is, and what has been going on since at least 1945.

Mr S. I hope I have answered your questions in a manner that is acceptable, and apologise for extending the answers, or deviating slightly from the main issues, which I believe to be all relevant to you and others like you who are very concerned. If there is anything that is not clear, please advise and I will do my best to give you the answers, but please understand that a lot of information is even held away from us, as “Top Secret” issues, which in itself is pathetic and not in the interests of the Public at large.

I thank you kindly for your communication and the time and effort you have spent on this matter.

In the meantime, I remain,
Kindest regards