Vulcanism in CA, ID and Northwest
By Dr. Boylan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Answer Is About Deep Earth Patterns
A little over 150 years ago, in 1851, twenty-one eruptive events from ash or lava eruption to steam bursts occurred in the western United States from Northern California to Oregon and the state of Washington. Volcanoes involved Mt. Baker (WA), Mt. Rainier (WA), Mt. St. Helens (WA), Mt. Hood (OR), Three Sisters (OR), Mt. Shasta (CA), Cinder Cone (CA), and Chaos Crags (CA). Are events quickly shaping up to a much larger repeat to recent history? New research data indicates a definite – yes.
Revolutionary technology today is observing an alarming deep subterranean process, which is bringing to life an underground system affecting the full state of California, the Pacific Northwest, and eastern Idaho (Yellowstone). Effects of this activity are providing small clues with regard to microquakes or swarms with moderate magnitudes up to 4’s, however the equivalent magnitude of ‘silent’ quake activity in the subterranean process are far greater. Why isn’t mainstream science aware of this? The answer is two reasons: the earth is being very ‘stealthy’ and second, mainstream science theories of crustal mechanics are faulty. (More on this later.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Earth is Giving Us Stealthy ‘Clues’
The Earth’s plates are comprised of a complex and dynamic number of systems spanning the globe that interact with each other in subtle ways and over long periods of time. However, the tools we use to observe the plates are at the very skin of earth’s crust. Seismographs do allow us to peek somewhat at physical structures and earthquakes also give us some glimpse of areas of activity. But the earth can move large amounts of deep magma silently, where current technology is blind. For what little we do see at the surface – as notable points below - how much is unseen in the deep subterranean?
A large bulge was recently discovered on South Sister Cascades Mountain in Oregon:
Nature News Service, Science Update, 22 May 2002
Sister develops tell-tale bulge
*“After 1500 years of quiet an Oregon volcano threatens to blow..”
*“An ominous bulge on a dormant volcano in Oregon, accompanied by the faint whiff of magma from deep within the Earth, suggests that the mountain is rousing itself from a 1,500-year slumber…”
*Eruptions from Steamboat Geyser – considered one of the tallest and most powerful geysers in Yellowstone can be from 4 days to 50 years apart. Recent years have seen an increase in the normally rare eruptions.
Yellowstone is known to have a massive magma chamber that has been bulging upward to near 3 ft from early survey work from 1923 to recent (1985)- although a net subsidence from 1985 to present.
Yellowstone National Park.com, 2003
‘Geology – Calderas’
*“Earthquake data also suggest that soft or molten rock is close to the surface of Yellowstone. Minor earthquakes jiggle Yellowstone hundreds of times each year, but above the caldera the foci of these quakes are extremely shallow, less than three miles below the surface. These clues suggest that the material underlying Yellowstone is still very hot and ductile, as would be expected if a magma chamber still exists.
*Swarms of earthquakes beneath Mount Hood (Oregon)
U.S. Geological Survey, JUanuary 14, 1999
Mt Hood – Information Statement
*“..All of the earthquakes in the Mount Hood swarms have characteristics similar to tectonic earthquakes rather than volcanic earthquakes (indicative of magma movement). The recent Mount Hood earthquakes most likely result from regional tectonic stresses, although they may also be caused by deep seated changes in the volcano's plumbing system. Additional and significantly different geological and geophysical indicators would be expected before any future eruptive activity. Scientists will continue to monitor the situation closely..”
*Swarms of earthquakes at Coso Volcanic Caldera (California) that has a known magma chamber, where it too has been moving upwards over geologic time.
*Swarms of earthquakes at Long Valley Caldera (California) which has a known magma chamber that has been bulging upwards over the last few decades.
*Recent discovery of strong ‘slow’ earthquakes moving across Pacific Northwest recurring every 14 months.
Geodesy Newsletter, 28 Mar 2002
NEW STUDY BY CWU SCIENTISTS REVEALS UNEXPECTED SLOW EARTHQUAKES IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST
In February 2002 a slow earthquake occurred in the Puget Sound region. Based on recurrence studies another is expected this Spring.
Make no mistake, these events are linked to much larger activity. They are directly related to what is “going on deep underneath”. Mainstream science is unaware of how dynamic the earth crustal mechanics actually turns out to demonstrate – it can change its elasticity of the crust where processes can accelerate at alarming rates.
Research instrumentation which is able to ‘see’ deep within the crust is watching a real-time interaction of all of these volcanic areas, from nearly the full length of California (Salton Sea to Mt Shasta), parts of Nevada, Pacific Northwest, and Eastern Idaho. This process has been building and is has been observed to be driven by Southern California from Salton Sea Basin/Mexicali-Imperial Valley rift region moving northward. While Pacific Northwest activity has been simultaneously responding at key volcanic locations in the Cascades. Recorded data illustrates a complex plumbing system that is acting as one – or the equivalent of a volcanic version of a much bigger San Andreas Fault except with a ‘Y’ to it.
Northward movement of the strongest energy – or the ‘head’ – of activity is as far northward as Owens Valley CA latitudes. Strong Earthquakes – such as Hector Mine 7.1 – have been observed to be symbiotic with the progression. Over the months, the subterranean progression has maintained a strong presence deep under the Coso Volcanic complex latitude. In recent data, the process now has strengthened a unified response in the Pacific Northwest subterranean readings. With the continued influx of solar flaring, the deep process is continuing to gather strength.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a Catastrophic Process Gathers
Strength, We Debate – Pointlessly
The Holy Grail of those seeking to predict earthquakes and/or volcanic eruptions would be if it were to do so with such precision that these events could become as common as Doppler radar forecasts are to weather. The ability to predict earthquakes and eruptions with extremely high degree of accuracy is here today. That is, for those willing to show the courage needed to think outside their well-funded boxes of science.
Current geological theory states that prediction is impossible (or close to it) due to the nature of sudden fracture (brittle fracture theory). Other researchers who state that animals can sense pending quakes, that humans are sensitive to ‘ear tones’ or headaches prior to, that odd cloud formations precede quakes, that ‘glowing lights’ occur before/during quakes, that quakes follow sun/earth/moon alignment (ocean & earth tides) or ‘syzygy’, are all at odds with a common theory. The answer is – both are correct.
Huh? Yes, both are correct. What has been eluding science is that there is a process that converges with ‘brittle fracture’ theory, but diverges on larger scale magnitudes. Landslides, rock bursts (in caves), man-made detonations all are accurate on ‘brittle fracture/elastic rebound’ dynamics. But what changes from ‘brittle fracture’ to an undiscovered process is so new to science that it represents a facinating study all to itself. A complex process that can only be compared to Classical physics (Newtonian) verses Quantum Physics. Classical Physics using force, mass, acceleration works accurately in our everyday world, but when applied to the tiny atomic world it doesn’t work. A new model where energy ‘jumps’ up or down in unit numbers referred to as ‘Quanta’ needs ot be applied. Yet both are accepted as valid and legitimate.
The theory of ‘Self Organized Criticality’ which is the basis for ‘brittle fracture’ theory in layman’s terms is ‘the straw that broke the Camel’s back’. Forgive the humor, but the earth operates in a mode that has a ‘nuclear’ straw that ‘blows up the Camel’. In science’s model of ‘the straw that broke the Camel’s back’, all is silent teetering on the edge of instability - a pending earthquake. Given this model, there cannot be any of these phenomena (animals, ‘ear tones’, headaches, etc). Yet, the earth does emit energy, very powerful indeed, that has been observed with this technology to disrupt animals, cause body aches in people, cause several different cloud formations to suddenly form, and elevate the temperature of the earth, etc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What the Debate is About –
Who’s Theory Says What
A broken, outdated theory: Imagine a wine glass –representing a fault - in a vise. The pressure of the vise is from plate movement or plate tectonics. Given enough pressure the wine glass shatters. This is the analogy to ‘brittle fracture’ earthquake genesis.
What really happens: Now imagine a powerful opera singer who sings a note at the same resonant frequency of the wine glass. Reaching a peak resonant power that matches the wine glass ‘tone resonance’ will result in the wine glass shattering. The result is the same, a shattered wine glass or fault (note: pressure in the fault is necessary for this process too)
Prior to large earthquakes, the fault in the earth will resonate powerfully just like the wine glass. This building process continues until either the wine glass resonant energy is dampened or the final burst of resonance occurs.
What is this energy? How does it occur? Some scientists have measured low frequency electromagnetic waves – or like radio waves – prior to earthquakes. A notable example was Antony Fraser-Smith on the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. However, this technique is elusive. That is due to the nature of the energy. Special equipment & sensors are required to detect it where traditional electromagnetic equipment will give very poor results. The emanations are ‘scalar’ and the strength of the energy is very large.
Faults resonate naturally in scalar. Power is built within faults from collapse of this resonance leading to even stronger resonant conditions. Strong resonating faults can be detected at distances over thousands of kilometers. Un-impeded, the process continues until the climax burst with earthquake following.
Biological entities such as humans, animals, and insects are affected by scalar emanations. Strong scalar emanation causes indirect ‘ear tones’ in auditory complex in the ears, cause magnetic sensitive biologicals to be affected, results in changes in magnetic fields (sliding refrigerator magnets) – thus insect disruption & bird sensitivities, cause sudden ionization in upper atmospherics leading to ‘bubble chamber’ like condensations, causes luminous phenomena such as glowing lights, the list goes on and on.
What is interesting is that the earthquake starts much earlier than the traditional mechanical movement. Recent discovery of ‘Silent’ or ‘Slow’ earthquakes – which violate ‘brittle fracture’ theory – are just the beginning phase of a traditional quake. However, this occurs more on a molecular basis in that crustal rigidity or modulus of elasticity changes (i.e. becomes rubbery). This is why P-waves are observed to travel slower before large earthquakes.
How did all of this knowledge come to be? From years of measurements of hundreds of earthquakes in California, Washington, and Oregon using very radical technology unknown to mainstream science. It has taken a number of generations of sensory equipment to perfect while also unravelling the mysteries of the complex processes leading to the genesis of the earthquake.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History of ‘Breakthrough’ Technology
Terra Research has conducted nearly 10 years of research and has developed technology that is able to observe the complete seismic genesis process. It is based on very sensitive scalar detection technology employing ‘mass resonant sensory devices’ (MRSD). It may be said that these devices are similar in nature to our human ability to react to scalar except the sensors react to primary signals. A book has been published that goes into detail of the research.
Documented in the book are recorded scalar climax burst events prior to earthquakes for M6.8 Satsop WA earthquake, M5.0 Olympia WA earthquake, and M7.9 Denali AK earthquake. Book extensively documents research data & technology, which has provided the astounding list of findings on earth dynamics.
New Discoveries unknown to current science –
1. The earth has specific gyroscalar resonant frequencies specific to latitude (i.e. San Francisco 1.4hz, Coso Volcanic region 1.13-1.15hz, Mt Hood 2.78hz, Mt St Helens 3.1hz) increases northward and is symmetrical to the poles (highest, 14.998hz at N/S poles).
2. Sudden scalar impulses emanate from faults & feed gyroscalar resonance to faults up to thousands of kilometers away
3. Resonating faults can ‘quiesce’ or ‘quiet’ other faults as one frequency becomes dominant. This action tends to disperse quakes equally in time and location (primary events, secondary aftershocks dominate and are inverse to quiesce as region of primary is saturated from primary event).
4. Solar activity generates waves of scalar that feed fault resonance and lead to earthquakes. A delay process of three to 10 days from initial solar impact is typical to burst climax.
5. Gyroscalar resonance stimulates the mesosphere/ionosphere to potential ‘air glow’ condiitons. Can change thermodynamics (accelerate) in re-entry vehicles or create charge accumulation conditions within the metallic body traversing scalar fields.
6. Scalar impulses from the earth can disrupt aircraft directly above (scalar penetrates faraday cage skin of aircraft). May cause ‘flameout’ in sensitive designs if impulse is endothermic.
7. Animal, insect, & human disruption reliably occurs from earth scalar emissions. However, the genesis process can take weeks, disturbing biologicals without a good match to the resulting quakes. This is due to the final process or climax that leads to the quake verses the ‘competition’ of differing frequencies quelling other fault activity.
8. Syzygy has been observed to create the strongest resonant building cycles – however, the final process involves the interaction of differing frequencies competing for climax burst. This interaction can alter the ‘window’ timing, as events tend to quell others and space more in time/location.
9. Slow or Silent earthquakes are part of the genesis process (climax burst) but of a different amplitude to frequency ratio (of scalar energy burst).
10. Traditional Earthquakes have large amplitude to frequency ratio with a scalar burst of 10 to 15 seconds (many hours prior) corresponding to M5.0, 40-50 second scalar burst to subsequent M6.5 to 7.0, 8 to 10 minute scalar burst for subsequent M7.8 to 8.3.
11. ‘Earthquake Boom’ - Upper frequency version of the earthquake family has a high frequency content in burst genesis vs latitudinal frequency.
12. Faults are not necessary for earthquake genesis (just a scalar burst climax).
13. Lighting strikes pulsing at latitudinal frequency (match) will result in a surface quake (within seconds).
14. A ‘lurch’ version earthquake can occur – notable by pipeline breaks.
15. Earthquakes generate powerful waves that transfer thousands of kilometers away.
16. Modulus of Elasticity changes as energy builds prior to earthquake.
17. Scalar emissions can elevate crustal temperature a number of degrees C prior to earthquake.
18. Powerful low frequency resonant quakes can occur (1 to 2 hz) at low vibrational levels in a wide region lasting many hours, with a prior scalar resonance up to 24 hrs previous. .
19. Volcanic activity generates harmonic scalar resonance precursors.
20. Strong gyroscalar resonance disrupts some traditional seismic sensors causing mysterious ‘sinewaves’ to be recorded. This from thermic & magnetic disruption.
21. Powerful scalar transients from earth can destroy microelectronics.
22. Faults emanate peculiar frequency components unique to themselves.
23. ‘Slow’ earthquakes are also ‘movers’ of magmatic bodies (i.e. the same genesis process & subsequent mechanical movement occurs at depth).
observing what the earth does with instruments that can ‘see’ the full dynamics of the earth. It is time to move away from debate of theoreticals to real data, away from statistics, chance, probability to real waveforms, real energy, real processes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Should Science do?
The most important step science needs to take is to open up the paradigm model rather than continue to detract sources of insight. Geologist Jim Berkland is very correct on the path of syzygy and animals, ‘ear tone’ sensitives are accurate in detection of earth generated waves, unusual cloud formations are real and earth generated. Perhaps with the ‘rest of the story’ coming to light, the studies which tried to find a correlation with a few puzzle pieces missing becomes understandable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is the Technology Ready?
Yes. The most useful instrument in observing the earth is employing a form of a very large radio telescope that stretches from border to border – the electrical power grid. With proper filters and a scalar resonant receiver, the earth signals & activity opens up the crust as an MRI machine opens up the view of the body. Locating activity is done by frequency (tones on a piano – in Fast Fourier Transform) and signal characteristics.
Mass Resonant Sensory Devices allow accurate validation of local emanations just as Doppler Radar allows accurate weather monitoring. Special MRSD coils allow fault mapping when faults are resonating, thus allowing mapping of buried faults or faults which have not revealed themselves from prior recorded earthquakes. Of note – a mapped fault which is not on the books measures strong scalar which follows just east of Nev/CA borderline in South Lake Tahoe. This mapped fault aligns with angle edge of fault that is on the ‘books’.
A private form of consumer device is close to market. Sensor TR8500S in current testing with complementary filter amplifier.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there timing to any Volcanics?
Perhaps the best answer is that close monitoring will be important. Yes there is an unprecedented level of activity going on, but it currently is deep. However, science should be aware that the earth dynamics allows events to occur far faster that mechanical models would suggest. This is due to the changes in crustal mechanics from so much energy saturating the crust. The subterranean activity is real. Another double-edged sword to this energy is that it tends to ‘quell’ other seismic events – thus the seeming lack of large quakes recently in California. But at the same time, this powerful resonant energy can quickly stimulate a region with a fault and accelerate the genesis process. These dynamics are the very reason science has been puzzled about the change in ‘time prediction model’ regarding Parkfield. Deep activity started to occur before the optimal window of Parkfield CA anticipated earthquake. So it has the ability to quell but the flip side is what is ‘alive’ that is causing the change.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Move Forward –or- Intensify the Debate?
We have the opportunity to resolve one of the most complex and yet fascinating forms of God’s nature, the earthquake; Or we have the opportunity to engage in a harmful debate (such as threatening fines) which likely will prevent any advance information to be disseminated or used in a positive respect for our society. We now are rushed into an arena where we never expected or prepared for – having information such as a prior large earthquake which forces a position of making decisions, who should know and who shouldn’t. I do not wish this horrible dilemma on anyone. Facing this reality in foreknowledge of other seismic events has brought only one conclusion, we must work to get information to all as best and accurate as technology permits, with society working together to adapt to consequences just as reports of pending hurricane technology is today.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------