'HELLO, CENTRAL!' 'SUBJECTS' OF THE QUEEN ? (Updated Oct. 22, 2009)
Patrick H. Bellringer
Message:
Casper is fooling you big time - have you not heard of backy-forthy?
The idea that the Queen would refer to Americans, who have been independent for 230+ years, as her "subjects" is so ludicrous as to be childish.
Does not his constant bashing of Obama ring alarm bells with you?
(Reply)
For those who have their heads where the sun does not shine:
Statutory Instrument 1997 No. 1778
This is where the Queen raised the Social Security taxes of her "subjects", U.S. citizens, in 1997.
Reading some of the crazy msgs you have to put up with here is a thought but you have likely heard it before.....
IGNORANCE IS CUREABLE
STUPIDITY IS PERMANENT !
Have a Great Day and Thanks again.........
R
I and my family will never and have never been a subject of the queen(lizard)or any other animal of her species. every time this comes up I have to respond I and every person (real human) are already royalty we don\'t need a monarch to pay taxes to or act as though we need to bow. we are victims of lies and deceit of 1913 and jeckyle island no taxes should have been paid by us as terifs paid the bills we as victims should be paid back. I and my family are royals of this country for our great 8 generations grandmother Nikita Hughes was powhattans sister in law so no matter what anyone thinks this country is still ours for We are pocahontas\' (REAL)COUSINS. the queen needs to take her ass-sets and go home. This is our country and always will be for the women of merica (real name) of america was owned by the women and we never sold any of our property so who ever said they paid for this country lied for women would never sell their birthright we were killed drunked given small pox and any genecided by england the dutch the portuguese and again I can't Stress this enough white people were cursed for doing what they did to us this is why this country will never become as great as it would have been. if it were left alone to become what it was supposed to be naturally this countrys spirit would have evolved into what god really wanted. We were hyjacked just as people of 1913 were hyjacked and the guides you put in place have to be monetered continuously instead of being left to their own volition to pretend to run a system without stealin the people blind such as the queen and he ilk for it is sickening to watch these ones bush bush clinton clinton obama do their best to steal fraud misprison us to death literally, and have a military that we pay to protect, have a doj that put its subjects in jail for the fun of it. As alex collier says "This is the only planet in the solar that has to pay to live on its\' surface.\" this is just so draconian no pun intended. I also knew that obama was nothing but a bush bot so I didn't vote because there was no one qualified to run our country except maybe ron paul less government I thought we were supposed to tell them what we needed THEM to do but bush paid all of them off with our money and look how long it has taken for something to happen. Yes we were terrorized by the very people put in charge. My brother is still waiting for his CMKX payment from stock bought 8-9 years ago. just think of the interest SEC is still draging its feet people have died waiting.does anyone care that 40 to 50 thousand people are involved they have the money and no payment. with this new Oct. 7th change maybe the settlements will come through I hope so my teeth and my eyes are both going bad. Sorry for the Irate attitude but I am 58 people have been waiting long enough my brother was 68 yesterday I think he deserves his money.
Seventy-five years ago your Butt-in-skies joke circulated among us kids as a Confucius-say joke. I am astonished and disenchanted that you attribute it to God Aton of Light. I\'ve been moved by reading the \"Truth\" again,since your re-posting and after having read it about a year ago. And I flat-out will NOT believe that God tells dirty jokes. And very seriously, I have never believed that God actually speaks to humans. For example, I believe that Moses himself wrote the Ten Commandments and then said they came from God, to give them weight. Can you affirm that God Aton does indeed talk to people? Thank you, V.V.V.
Thanks for the interesting reply. I totally agree with you and many others about the inequities of the FRB etc. And I agree that deep within the British monarchy there are some nasty geomasonic types no doubt in cahoots with the 13 families you refer to, but the Queen herself is a bulwark against the corruption and I am sure does not consider Americans her subjects...We are too aware in Britain that our country has been going backwards in influence on the last 50 years thanks to the incompetence of our political leaders, but the Queen has managed to maintain some of our standing in the world.
I get v.suspicious when commentators such as Casper attack the wrong targets.
Thanks for the book suggestion, I will check it out.
Good joke by the way!
Regards,
S.M.
#6 (Reply)
Finally! An American who understands the predaciment America is in as a Province
of the Pontiff of Rome's Holy Roman Empire, and what the American people mean
to the CEO of that fascist corporate body, the secular Holy Roman Empire:
Papal Bull UNAM SANCTAM 1302, a Papal Bull that was re-confirmed by Cardinal Ratzinger,
now Pope:
"Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary
for salvation that every human creature be SUBJECT TO the Roman Pontiff."
EW
Anyway, I went through systematically below and corrected the first 50% of his contentions for your review. I am convinced that nothing further in his discourse will have anymore accuracy and credibility than the first half, so I have no incentive to put further time into this(although I am open to correction) . If the findings are in error please have the source of the information provide legal precedent(Supreme Court), and/or reference from the Federal Reports or Register, etc.
Anyway for your consideration. . .see below.
http://www.ssa.gov/international/agreements_overview.html
http://www.ssa.gov/international/
http://www.ssa.gov/international/status.html
These are the site I used in referrance to the ss STATEMENTS ON YOUR SITE.. Not saying you are incorrect in the statements that the Queen has or has not controls of our country but these sites explained the Social Secutiry agreements between countries..
I like to see both sides of the stories.. Might come from being married for over 37 years everyone has their views and takes on everything..
#9 (Reply)
The #7 response to this article appears to be a 'damage control goon' for the Vatican.
The denial commentary is without proof or substantative commentary.
The King George III in the preamble to the Peace of Paris 1783 stating that he was 'prince elector and treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire' is totally significant to the conclusions made by Mr. Ames regarding Papal control over the former British colonies in America.
I have seen this same 'damage control' babble posted many times by a fellow who used to be with the State of Kentucky Education Dept., and who uses an Israeli computer program called Megaphone to be alerted to 'the Vatican's Veil' damaging commentary or information that is posted on the internet.
The 'judge' whom the posting party referred to also acted as a dis-information agent (ignorantly or with purpose) to divert attention away from the Vatican, and to the English Monarchy. The Treaty of 1213 between King John and Pope Innocent III, where king John pledged England FOREVER, as a vassal State of the Holy Roman Empire set the stage for the Pope of AD 1297 and King Edward I to incorporate a body politic to govern England, rather than a reliance on the Monarch directly. That was the 'Crown' of England, and later, Great Britain. It was a sub-corporation of the body politic of the City of London, which was/is also called 'The Crown'. Thus, the judge saying that 'he takes his orders from England' really means the City of London, an independent city/state within England that is wholly wned by the super corporation, the Holy Roman Empire, whose CEO is the Pontiff of Rome.
EW
#10 (Reply)
Re:
P.P.S. GUESSWORK FOLLOWS: Somehow the Queen, WE hear, is related to the Rothschild's (as is Barbara Bush) AND, going back to the early 30's, the "CHURCH" (and therefore the QUEEN??) was sympathetic to the NAZI'S, which also involved the MONARCHY. WE also hear the VATICAN had somehow obtained control of the MONARCHY hundreds of years prior. This stuff is above OUR heads and is mentioned here as a "tip" to those such as "S" and/or STORY and/or WHISTLEBLOWER who may or may not wish to comment and/or educate us ignorant "subjects".
May we in the first place thank you for your tremendous efforts to bring the world to a better understanding of the truth.
The sentence in Casper's last update "WE also hear the VATICAN had somehow obtained control of the MONARCHY hundreds of years prior" may be easily
explained by a short story of Dutch history, which you - nor Casper - may not know, but which we are glad to share with you.
At about 1685 - 1687 there was a certain balance between the powers of France (the catholic King Louis XIV), England (the catholic King James II from
the House of Stuart), and the Seven United Provinces, better known as The Dutch Republic. The Dutch Republic was ruled by The States General and the
army's and fleet's leader at that time was the prince William III of Orange, such with the title of Stadholder. Something of the same as the lord Denethor of Gondor,
such in the absence of a king. However, the real power of the prince of Orange was a little less, as the Dutch people did not like to have an usurper.
Prince William III, far from catholic, was an ambitious man, who had married the princess Mary, daughter of King James II of England.
In 1688 the political balance was changed, and war was about to begin, and in autumn a large fleet of 500 vessels sailed to the South coast of England.
Aboard was a fully equipped invasion army of at about 21.000 seasoned troops. After the landing, the absolute power of James II was easily broken and
he fled to France. In February 1689 the Stadholder William became joint sovereign of England together with his wife. William ruled England till 1702.
Now, the point was that the enormous costs of this operation were not paid by the Dutch States General, nor by the rich Dutch regents and merchants,
but... in the deepest of deepest secrecy by the Pope of Rome, Innocentius Xl. This fact was even by Dutch historians not largely known till some years ago.
This loan (partly a gift) was paid by the powerful Odescalchi Family to which this Pope belonged. It is not without reasoning to think that the Pope will have had
"his price" to the English monarchy.
With best regards,
In love & light,
A&S
The Netherlands
Our meditations and prayers are with you both.
Keep up the good work!
Elizabeth Windsor's oaths of allegiance; a glimpse into the retarding frictions of lite criminality
Alcuin Bramerton
Casper is accurate in his view that historical oaths are presenting a retarding friction in getting Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) to unblock her opposition to the delivery of the prosperity fund trigger packs.
The Queen regards herself as a sworn guardian of the historical treasure of the Knights Templar. The Knights Templar are now better known as the Jesuits. The treasure of the Templars is not a particular stash of gold or sequestered riches. The treasure of the Knights Templar is the total financial control of the planet.
In the 1950s, as a young women, and recently enthroned as Queen, Elizabeth Windsor, was compelled by her mother, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, to take the Jesuit Blood Oath. This is sometimes referred to as the Jesuit Extreme Oath and Induction. The text of this Satanic rite was placed on the US Congressional record on the 15th February 1913. The page was torn out by a vandal at a later date. The full text of the Jesuit Blood Oath can be read here:
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/jesuit_extreme_oath_of_induction.htm
When the Queen, as quoted by Casper, talks about burning \"them\" she was probably talking (or thinking) about burning her own entrails with sulphur should she betray the Jesuit Blood Oath and allow financial control of the planet to slip away to an uncontrollable Other.
Elizabeth Windsor took the Jesuit Blood Oath in secret, one August, at Balmoral Castle in Scotland. A related curio, perhaps relevant to that remote location in Aberdeenshire, is that the Jesuits wrote the first 25 degrees of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry in 1754. More background about this can be found here:
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/jesuit_world_control.htm
And Benjamin Fulford has commented on the Satanic goings-on which are conducted under the radar at Balmoral here:
Elizabeth Windsor, as the English Monarch, is officially the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. This is a sensational blind. The English Reformation Church is an heretical construct in the Roman Catholic and Jesuit worldview. To have a sworn Jesuit in charge of the Church of England for the purposes of covert subversion is very Illuminati and very Jesuit. The Illuminati modus operandi has always been to say one thing in public and to prosecute the exact opposite in private. And Ignatius Loyola, the founder and first Superior General of the Jesuits, in the Thirteenth Rule (365) in his Spiritual Exercises says: \"To be right in everything, we ought always to hold that the white which I see, is black, if the Hierarchical Church so decides it ...."
In the early 1990s, for genuine spiritual reasons connected with the influence of one of her (Anglican) chaplains, Elizabeth Windsor began to get jumpy about her Jesuit connection. Foolishly, she confided her worries to her mother. Shortly afterwards, on the orders of the then Superior General of the Jesuits, Peter Hans Kolvenbach, she was terminated and cloned. The details of this unremarked regicide may shortly emerge.
But Casper is also right to stress the Nazi nature of the oaths which Elizabeth Windsor feels she is constrained by. The House of Windsor has impeccable Nazi roots, as does the US Bush family.
It is said that one of the Pandora\'s suitcase documents involving the Queen has to do with the manner in which her family was actively in touch with leading Nazis throughout the Second World War.
The Duke of Windsor, for example, had been in close collaboration with the Nazis in Spain and Portugal to foment a revolution in wartime Britain, which would topple the Churchill government, depose his brother King George VI, and allow him to regain the throne, with Queen Wallis (Simpson, the American divorcée, for whom he abdicated the throne) at his side. Explicit correspondence germane to this plot was lodged at Kronberg Castle.
In June 1945, King George VI, dispatched the former MI5 officer turned "Surveyor of the King's Pictures", Anthony Blunt, to gather up the incriminating correspondence. These papers are now thought to be held at Stonyhurst College in Lancashire, the Jesuit\'s English HQ.
Later on in 1978 and 1979, when the UK Thatcher government was fitting up Anthony Blunt as the \"fourth man\" in the Cambridge spy ring, Queen Elizabeth II insisted that there should be no interrogation of Blunt about his secret trip to Kronberg Castle.
More here:
http://theuniversalseduction.com/featuring/the-nazi-roots-of-the-house-of-windsor
The "Holy Roman Empire" to which EW refers is alternately known as the "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation": it's not actually Roman! (Nor is it "Holy".)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire
King George III, against whose forces the American revolutionaries fought in the late-1700s, held a title of "Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire". "British" royalty has for several centuries been essentially German (Saxe-Coburg and Gotha; rebranded "Windsor" in 1917 to sound more English). Queen Anne was the last monarch of the (Scottish) House of Stuart; when she died in 1714, the throne she had occupied in London passed to George I of the House of Hanover (HolyRoman Empire/modern-day Germany).
Germany, you will note, is also the birthplace of the Rothschild dynasty -- more specifically Frankfurt, Germany whose coat of arms is here (notice the red shield):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen-frankfurt.png
And what nationality is the current pope again?
"British Freemasonry's Control of the Roman Catholic Church":
http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/new_world_order/news.php?q=1240852983
In the recent post of "Casper" issues were discussed that may be paramount to the future of us all.
There are many of "us" that can exercise Real Authority over insurgent situations. It is True, all corporations are under British Law and Rule. The Living Man, however, is NOT.
Treaties are the Supreme Law of the Land; however, non-treaty Category 4 American Natives that are still under the white "truce" flag, not a flag of surrender or "their" flag called "Old Glory" and we are the ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE RIGHT OF SOIL - PERIOD.
We are the only True Judges of the land. The corporate \"judges\" have no jurisdiction over non-corporate entities. We are available.
Copied below is from 1968 Encyclopedia Britannica:
Cherokee Nation is of the Iroquoian lineage, originally located in eastern Tennessee and western North and South Carolina [and Georgia]; had approximately 200 towns, or villages, and in 1650, their population was about 22,000. Cherokee had a confederacy of red and white towns, otherwise known as war and peace towns; peace towns were comparable to "sanctuary" of Biblical standards. The chiefs were appropriately named supreme chief of war or supreme chief of peace.
The Cherokee first came to notice in 1730 when Sir Alexander Cuming, an emissary of King George II, conferred the title of emperor on Chief Moytoy at Tellico, Tenn. [Does "first in time, first in line" ring a bell? And, does not "emperor" have plenary power?]
With that in mind, only the Cherokee obtained "title of office" over "British" lands in North America. The "office" is still manned and maintained through the Cherokee Nation. And, with that in mind, has not the Cherokee readily acknowledged our Creator, the Eternal Heavenly Father, as "King" forever? Does that not transfer the title of Emperor to our Father, Yahweh? Is not this the "portal/door" (along with proper Sabbatical (Passover) obedience) to the Kingdom of Heaven?" I could say MUCH more, but...